Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

[Paul J. Lucas]

On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:

> I wrote:
> >So essentially I'm being asked to pay for his mistake of
> >misnaming his module/distribution ...

> If that is how you prefer to see it, then yes.  Though I don't see it as
> being a price to pay.  I see it as action to take, but the action is not
> negative or punitive in any way that I can tell.

        It's negative in that I have to take previous time to update
        all my source code, documentation, and web site.

> If Sean does not agree, then that is his business.  Since his was there
> first, it is incumbent on you to deal with that by changing the name of
> yours, in my opinion.

        And as I've already /clearly/ stated /many/ times, I am /not/
        taking my precious time to contrive a new name.  Why you
        haven't picked up on that simple fact already is beyond me.  If
        somebody /else/ wants to sit around for hours, days, or months
        trying to come up with a better name, /then/ he's free to
        suggest it to me.

        OK, I'll try to make it painfully clear: any further discussion
        on this is a mutual waste of time.  The only things I /might/
        consider and /good/ name suggestions.

        - Paul