Re: String::Diff - Co-Maintainership? (resend)

2024-11-25 Thread Neil Bowers
Hi Steffen, I have given you co-maint on String-Diff. Cheers, Neil

String::Diff - Co-Maintainership? (resend)

2024-11-21 Thread Steffen Schwigon via modules
(resend - first had messed up quoted email and I forgot to address Neil directly) Hello Neil, hello PAUSE admins, I am SCHWIGON on PAUSE. I am quite certain to not get an answer from the author YAPPO about the module "String::Diff" in attached email, as he is inactive since 2015, hi

Re: String::Diff - Co-Maintainership? (resend)

2024-11-20 Thread Neil Bowers
hear back from YAPPO, I'll give you co-maint. Cheers, Neil On 19 Nov 2024 at 23:21 +, Steffen Schwigon , wrote: > (resend - first had messed up quoted email and I forgot to address Neil > directly) > > Hello Neil, hello PAUSE admins, > > I am SCHWIGON on PAUSE. > >

Re: PAUSE ID request (ELIONORA; Eleonora Goldmann), 1. resend

2021-01-12 Thread eleonor...@gmx.net
Hi, I still did not get a password. Are there any problems with user id's? Thanks in advance.. 2020-12-31 20:37 keltezéssel, Perl Authors Upload Server írta: Request to register new user fullname: Eleonora Goldmann userid: ELIONORA mail: CENSORED homepage: why: I'd like to

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-05 Thread Joel Berger
While maintaining that I am essentially an outsider in this discussion, I was CC-ed so I will reply. I read both of the indicated comment differently than you do I think. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:57 PM Peter Rabbitson wrote: > On 10/04/2016 11:36 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: > > > > Had I not got exp

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-05 Thread Graham Knop
On 10/3/16 4:46 PM, David Golden wrote: > *Everyone, please direct all further conversation on this matter to the > DBIC mailing list* Forgive me if I don't. While I've been watching the conversation, nobody yet seems to have approached the most important part of this conversation as I see it, wh

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Matt S Trout
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:56:50PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > [1] > https://web.archive.org/web/20161004214347/http://blogs.perl.org/users/peter_rabbitson/2013/07/crowdsourcing-self-confidence.html#comment-1129854 "So far as I'm concerned you've been the DBIC chainsaw delegate for years" De

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/05/2016 12:17 AM, Joel Berger wrote: While yes I think it would have been helpful if the intention made at the time of the transfer of first-come to you were in a more public forum than IRC logs, I also think that comments halfway down a BPO posting isn't a great place to assert BDFL-ness

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread David Golden
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Graham Knop wrote: > Forgive me if I don't. > That's fine. Your comments address the meta-issue. > PAUSE has no governance model. Nor, really, does "Perl" in the broadest sense. PAUSE admins have discussed this in coming up with a response. What people thin

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/04/2016 11:36 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: Had I not got explicit agreement before transferring anything that all I was doing was easing co-maint addition, I would absolutely not have gone down this route. Since we are digging in the past: had I not gotten an unambiguous legitimization of my

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Matt S Trout
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:10PM -0400, Graham Knop wrote: > On 10/3/16 4:46 PM, David Golden wrote: > > *Everyone, please direct all further conversation on this matter to the > > DBIC mailing list* > > Forgive me if I don't. While I've been watching the conversation, > nobody yet seems to hav

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-03 Thread David Golden
> The only wide-reaching forum that I myself am aware of is the mailing > list, mentioned at the expected spot in the metadata: > https://metacpan.org/source/RIBASUSHI/DBIx-Class-0.082840/META.yml#L66 Great! I've joined the DBIC mailing list and have sent a post explaining the situation

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-03 Thread Matt S Trout
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:34:25PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Ditto. I realise that fostering community involvement requires that the > people who are intimately familiar with the codebase spend more time > giving constructive review feedback on contributions and mentoring new > cont

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-03 Thread Jess Robinson
Hi folks, Hmm, my @cpan.org emails land in a "mostly pile of spam" folder, oops. On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 12:33:54 +0100, David Golden wrote: We, too, encourage other maintainers and/or community members to join the conversation. David Golden Twitter/IRC/GitHub: @xdg Having read the last few

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-03 Thread Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
"Jess Robinson" writes: > Admittedly I haven't been following the DBIC ML / commits lately, for at > least a year.. This is mostly because its felt like > > a) Nothing is allowed to be added/tweaked until specifically approved by > Riba, or until some other piece of work is finished which can onl

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-03 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/02/2016 03:01 PM, David Golden wrote: > The selected person will not be announced until after the fact, in order to > insulate him from having to deal with mst, Let's put aside the identity of the person for the moment. Earlier you said: >#4 is not an ideal, but a viable chance for the

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread Christian Walde
On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 15:01:48 +0200, David Golden wrote: The selected person will not be announced until after the fact, in order to insulate him from having to deal with mst, Let's put aside the identity of the person for the moment. Earlier you said: #4 is not an ideal, but a viable

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread Aaron Crane
My general inclination is to avoid getting involved in discussions of this sort, but in this case, I do think that the views of at least one third party might be helpful. David Golden writes: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > > I again must stress that there has been a h

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread fREW Schmidt
Well, I'd rather stay out of it for reasons riba basically already made clear, but my thoughts are at the end of https://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com/posts/open-source-infrastructure-and-dbix-class-diagnostics-improvements/ , written quite a while ago. I am content with Riba's plan, though am skepti

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread Matt S Trout
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:34:06PM -0700, fREW Schmidt wrote: > I am content with Riba's plan, though am skeptical he could find a person > living who can replace him. Not to offend the various people who could, > but the combination of intelligence, caution, and knowledge of the project > itself,

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread David Golden
> The selected person will not be announced until after the fact, in order to > insulate him from having to deal with mst, Let's put aside the identity of the person for the moment. Earlier you said: > #4 is not an ideal, but a viable chance for the user community to come > together and take res

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/02/2016 01:33 PM, David Golden wrote: On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Peter Rabbitson > wrote: > The administrative transfer *combined* with the amount of work put > in by myself, and the utter disinterest of all other maintainers, places > me practically, procedu

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread David Golden
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > The administrative transfer *combined* with the amount of work put > in by myself, and the utter disinterest of all other maintainers, places > me practically, procedurally and morally in the position to unilaterally > decide what to do with

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-02 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/01/2016 11:07 PM, David Golden wrote: Hi, Peter. Thank you for taking the time to organize and share your thoughts. > It took me a considerable amount of time to put this together, I hope > you will respect this effort by crafting a similarly thought out response. Please don't confuse

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-01 Thread Matt S Trout
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 05:09:17PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Matt, > > Per my last email, I would appreciate if you could repeat publicly your > statements to PAUSE admins about the transfer of first-come permissions for > DBIC. Thank you. > > David For simplicity's sake, I hereby repeat the

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-01 Thread David Golden
Matt, Per my last email, I would appreciate if you could repeat publicly your statements to PAUSE admins about the transfer of first-come permissions for DBIC. Thank you. David

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-01 Thread David Golden
Hi, Peter. Thank you for taking the time to organize and share your thoughts. > It took me a considerable amount of time to put this together, I hope > you will respect this effort by crafting a similarly thought out response. Please don't confuse the speed and brevity of my response with a lack

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-01 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 09/22/2016 01:51 AM, David Golden wrote: *Our position:* (1) Given the importance of DBIC to the broader Perl community (i.e. way "upriver "), we’d like to see a more open discussion between existing maintainers about what happens next in ter

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-09-22 Thread Matt S Trout
I'd like to second David's comment that an ideal outcome here would be consensus. DBIx::Class has historically run on consensus among the team, wherein my position as founder and then riba's as chainsaw delegate were only ever used to tiebreak rather than to enforce, and I believe that's a valuable

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-09-22 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 09/22/2016 01:53 AM, David Golden wrote: [Followup with a copy of Peter's private reply and my public response.] Thank you for not burying this thread. I am shortly scheduled to speak at a conference, so likely won't be able to write a thorough reply today. Stay tuned.

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-09-21 Thread David Golden
[Followup with a copy of Peter's private reply and my public response.] On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > ( adding more people on BCC, as usual ) > > David, > > I must remind you that it was me who reached out publicly[1] to the PAUSE > admins as a sole CPAN author, seeki

Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-09-21 Thread David Golden
[In response to a request by Peter Rabbitson to keep discussions in the public record, I am resending this email verbatim and adding modules@perl.org to the recipient list. I will follow up with a copy of his reply and my response to that.] [bcc: PAUSE administrators] Hello, everyone. I'm writi

resend

2003-06-11 Thread David Muir Sharnoff
I didn't get any response from this, so I'm resending... ORIGINALLY From muir (ARCHIVE) Date: Fri May 23 16:53:51 2003 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: updates for my module listings I've taken a look at how my modules are listed... * *** Operating System Interfaces, Hardware Drivers * * BSD::

New Registration (resend)

2002-08-15 Thread David Dick
G'day all, Details for new registration follow; Name: David Dick Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: N/A User-ID: DDICK or DAVIDDICK Initial Planned Contribution: Finance::Bank::Commonwealth, a front-end to an Australian Banking website. Uru -dave

PAUSE registration (ESM, resend)

2002-02-19 Thread Ed Santiago
name: Eduardo Santiago Munoz email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page URL: http://www.pobox.com/~esm/ preferred userID: ESM, SANTIAGO planning to contribute: Have coordinated with Rik Harris to take over maintenance of Net::NIS

Re: resend: MRML new top level namespace?

2001-11-12 Thread Andrea Holstein
Tim Bunce wrote: > > > I don't know MRML :-(( > > But as you describe, that MRLM is an XML DTD ... > > I first would imagine to create the namespace > > XML::MRML. > > That approach is tempting but doesn't scale well as everything in > the world gets its own DTD eventually... > > We have a simi

Re: resend: MRML new top level namespace?

2001-11-12 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:35:55AM +0100, Andrea Holstein wrote: > Wolfgang Mller wrote: > > > > MRML is an XML DTD for shipping queries for multimedia servers. The goal is > > here to encapsulate queries in XML to improve interoperability in this > > quickly moving field of research. > > > > ..

Re: resend: MRML new top level namespace?

2001-11-09 Thread Andrea Holstein
Wolfgang Müller wrote: > > MRML is an XML DTD for shipping queries for multimedia servers. The goal is > here to encapsulate queries in XML to improve interoperability in this > quickly moving field of research. > > ... > > We think it would be useful for users of MRML to have MRML-specific mod

resend: MRML new top level namespace?

2001-11-08 Thread Wolfgang Müller
Hi, MRML is an XML DTD for shipping queries for multimedia servers. The goal is here to encapsulate queries in XML to improve interoperability in this quickly moving field of research. MRML is going to be used as communication protocol in the Benchathlon initiative. The Benchathlon's goal is

Re: Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-17 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On 17 Nov 2000 17:03:00 +0100, Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > All in all, this is very good news. Thanks! > But, the Tk modules are now covering quite a range of applications: > specialised widget (RO::Text, TreeGraph ,...) , "real estate" manager > (NoteBook,

Re: Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) writes: > >> lists the new location as: > >> > >> http://www.Lehigh.EDU/~sol0/ddumont/ptk_module_list.html > > > This is correct thanks to Steve Lidie who lends me some place out of > > HP firewalls. > > So Dominique, there are two things to say: PAUSE

Re: Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-16 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
(CCs trimmed) > On 16 Nov 2000 16:47:26 +0100, Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > Achim Bohnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I didn't anwser? I'm getting old :( >> Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cc'ed) >> is for about half a year the new maintainer of the tk module li

Re: Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-16 Thread Dominique Dumont
Achim Bohnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't anwser? I'm getting old :( > Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cc'ed) > is for about half a year the new maintainer of the tk module list. My address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] A more permanent alias is [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > lists the new loca

Re: Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-16 Thread Achim Bohnet
On Thursday 16 November 2000 10:59, Graham Barr wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:10:21AM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > Achim and Jonathan, > > > > please give me your OK to that plan, I do not want to interfere with > > your plans. Apache is done, I'd like to work on XML and Tk soonish. >

Re: Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-16 Thread Graham Barr
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:10:21AM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > Achim and Jonathan, > > please give me your OK to that plan, I do not want to interfere with > your plans. Apache is done, I'd like to work on XML and Tk soonish. > Are these URLs for the two module lists up to date? > > CPAN/a

Resend: CPAN::Admin and Module Lists Integration

2000-11-16 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
Achim and Jonathan, please give me your OK to that plan, I do not want to interfere with your plans. Apache is done, I'd like to work on XML and Tk soonish. Are these URLs for the two module lists up to date? CPAN/authors/id/E/EI/EISEN/perl-xml-modules.html http://mysite.directlink.net/gbarr/Per