On 06/01/01 Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > Anyway, if Kenneth doesn't speak up for himself, I think he is not
> > against me handling the Gtk-Perl namespace for the time being:
> > for what I know I hasn't worked on the Gtk module since 1999.
> > And yes, 0.7006 is so much better than 0.7000
> On Mon, 28 May 2001 15:26:50 +0200, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Well, the story goes like this: from about January 2000 I started
> making the releases for Gtk-Perl and Kenneth kindly uploaded the files
> to CPAN. After a while I didn't get any feedback from Kenneth and
On 05/28/01 Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > got a cpan problem for you. there are now two gtkperl distributions with
> > two different maintainers. K/KJ/KJALB/Gtk-Perl-0.7000.tar.gz and
> > L/LU/LUPUS/Gtk-Perl-0.7006.tar.gz. - 0.7006 claims to deprecate all other
> > versions. the problem is
> On Sun, 27 May 2001 15:26:49 -0400 (EDT), Matt Cashner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> got a cpan problem for you. there are now two gtkperl distributions with
> two different maintainers. K/KJ/KJALB/Gtk-Perl-0.7000.tar.gz and
> L/LU/LUPUS/Gtk-Perl-0.7006.tar.gz. - 0.7006 claims to depre
