> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:52:38 -0800, Glenn Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> I'm working on it . . . bundling these modules makes more sense
> anyway, so perhaps that's the way I'll go (or do I have to own a
> namespace to do that? hmm . . .)
On CPAN, as it was accidentally designed,
Randal -
A-ha! I understand now. CPAN.pm grabs the latest version of every module,
rather than those from my latest release (I can see how that caused you
some problems). Since that difficulty I had with WinCVS last summer, it
started the version numbers over on some of my modules.
I knew I sh
>>>>> "brian" == brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> between 2.23 and 2.26 of Scraper, WWW::Search::Scraper::NorthernLight
>> went retrograde. Either release a new version of Scraper that has
>> an updated version of NorthernLight, o
> "Glenn" == Glenn Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Glenn> Randal -
Glenn> Good idea. Scraper is so dependant on search engines' formats that
Glenn> older versions are practically worthless anyhow. I've deleted most of
Glenn> them.
Glenn> I have significantly improved Scraper::NorthernLight (
00, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
between 2.23 and 2.26 of Scraper, WWW::Search::Scraper::NorthernLight
went retrograde. Either release a new version of Scraper that has
an updated version of NorthernLight, or remove all versions of Scraper
prior to 2.26. Thanks.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randal L. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> between 2.23 and 2.26 of Scraper, WWW::Search::Scraper::NorthernLight
> went retrograde. Either release a new version of Scraper that has
> an updated version of NorthernLight, or remove al
between 2.23 and 2.26 of Scraper, WWW::Search::Scraper::NorthernLight
went retrograde. Either release a new version of Scraper that has
an updated version of NorthernLight, or remove all versions of Scraper
prior to 2.26. Thanks.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc
