Cool I will hold off then, thanks.
Mmmm... this is fun :-)
Scott
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 11:17 Australia/Melbourne, _brian_d_foy
wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott
Penrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, I will pop them through the system today. I will also be adding
VFS::Per
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Penrose
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, I will pop them through the system today. I will also be adding
> VFS::Perl, which is the pure perl implementation.
i think we're still debating that namespace.
--
brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://p
Please submit new requests for VFS and VFS::Gnome and I will accept
them in a couple of days barring any latecomer has some really good
comments.
Arthur
Hey Guys
Sure, I will pop them through the system today. I will also be adding
VFS::Perl, which is the pure perl implementation.
Piers and
On onsdag, nov 6, 2002, at 18:32 Europe/Stockholm, _brian_d_foy wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur
Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On onsdag, nov 6, 2002, at 13:36 Europe/Stockholm, Piers Harding
wrote:
Please submit new requests for VFS and VFS::Gnome and I will accept
them i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur Bergman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On onsdag, nov 6, 2002, at 13:36 Europe/Stockholm, Piers Harding wrote:
> Please submit new requests for VFS and VFS::Gnome and I will accept
> them in a couple of days barring any latecomer has some really good
> comm
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur Bergman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just because the library is named GnomeVFS doesn't mean it have to have
> that name on CPAN does it? Doesn't VFS::Gnome give enough credit to the
> underlying library?
if the module is a Perl interface to a s
On onsdag, nov 6, 2002, at 13:36 Europe/Stockholm, Piers Harding wrote:
OK -if that's the vote then I will live with it. As I said the
GnomeVFS
case is slightly different in that that is the name of the library
( http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/gnome-vfs/index.html ) - but in
the
interest
OK -if that's the vote then I will live with it. As I said the GnomeVFS
case is slightly different in that that is the name of the library
( http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/gnome-vfs/index.html ) - but in the
interests of peace :-) It is far more important to get the general
scheme of VF
Hi,
Just because the library is named GnomeVFS doesn't mean it have to have
that name on CPAN does it? Doesn't VFS::Gnome give enough credit to the
underlying library? Why do we need to to say the obscure acronym ;)
twice in 15 characters, taking up 6!
I don't really mind between VFS:: and Fil
