On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:30:28PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> If so, can you submit another request on POD::Component::Daemon::Win32
> on PAUSE? :-)
Err, I meant POE::Component::Daemon::Win32, of course... :)
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:12:05AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
> > modid: POE::Component::Win32::Daemon
>
> (Oops, really cc'ing the POE people at [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> I was under the impression that POE::Com
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 02:22:43PM -0800, Peter Guzis wrote:
> I don't have a preference one way or another. My original thought was
> to keep it consistent with the naming of the base module
> (Win32::Daemon) and Win32::* modules in general. I'm open to
> suggestions.
If so, can you submit anot
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Module submission POE::Component::Win32::Daemon
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
> modid: POE::Component::Win32::Daemon
(Cc'ing the POE people a
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
> modid: POE::Component::Win32::Daemon
(Oops, really cc'ing the POE people at [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I was under the impression that POE::Component::* modules are categorized
by functionality, not by platform; so, ma
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
> modid: POE::Component::Win32::Daemon
(Cc'ing the POE people at [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I was under the impression that POE::Component::* modules are categorized
by functionality, not by platform; so, maybe
POE:
