I don't have a preference one way or another. My original thought was to keep it consistent with the naming of the base module (Win32::Daemon) and Win32::* modules in general. I'm open to suggestions.
Peter -----Original Message----- From: Autrijus Tang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Module submission POE::Component::Win32::Daemon On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote: > modid: POE::Component::Win32::Daemon (Cc'ing the POE people at [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I was under the impression that POE::Component::* modules are categorized by functionality, not by platform; so, maybe POE::Component::Daemon::Win32 is a better choice here, so there can be POE::Component::Daemon::Unix in the future. What do you think? Thanks, /Autrijus/
