In perl.modules, you wrote:
>
>I expected the extra work would come when somebody answers them after
>the submission that the name is inappropriate. Currently answering is
>the only way to veto a namespace. Any admin can approve by clicking,
>nobody can disapprove without voicing an opinion. That
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:22:15 -0700, "Kurt D. Starsinic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:45:54PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> I think we should not let people submit new top-level module names
>> without extra work/steps/justifications etc.
>>
>> And along with
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:22:15PM -0700, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:45:54PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > I think we should not let people submit new top-level module names
> > without extra work/steps/justifications etc.
> >
> > And along with that add a mechanism to re
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:45:54PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> I think we should not let people submit new top-level module names
> without extra work/steps/justifications etc.
>
> And along with that add a mechanism to request a new top-level category::*
I agree that those are good ideas.
That name's way too generic. And isn't there a category::* that the module could
live under?
Tim.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:38:13AM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
>
> The next version of the Module List will list the following module:
>
> modid: Tasks
> DSLIP: bdpOg
I think we should not let people submit new top-level module names
without extra work/steps/justifications etc.
And along with that add a mechanism to request a new top-level category::*
Tim.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:38:13AM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
>
> The next version of th
The next version of the Module List will list the following module:
modid: Tasks
DSLIP: bdpOg
description: Module for tasks/projects and time tracking
userid: SERGEY (Sergey Gribov)
chapterid: 23 (Miscellaneous_Modules)
enteredby: ANDK (Andreas J. König)
entere
