On Mar 3, 2011, at 23:27, brian d foy wrote:
> In article <87ipw3jnxl@franz.ak.mind.de>, (Andreas J. Koenig)
> wrote:
>>
>> Objection! Bundle:: and Task:: both have their merits. A Bundle can
>> determine the order in which the objects get installed. ...
>
> Point taken. Have you found use
In article <87ipw3jnxl@franz.ak.mind.de>, (Andreas J. Koenig)
wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:37:50 -0600, brian d foy
> > said:
>
> > bundles are
> > ancient technology. Task::* is the way to go now. :)
>
> Objection! Bundle:: and Task:: both have their merits. A Bundle can
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:37:50 -0600, brian d foy
> said:
> bundles are
> ancient technology. Task::* is the way to go now. :)
Objection! Bundle:: and Task:: both have their merits. A Bundle can
determine the order in which the objects get installed. It may name
distributions direct
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <201102281846.p1sikmxs015...@pause.fiz-chemie.de>, Perl
Authors Upload Server wrote:
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: Bu
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: Bundle::CommonModules
DSLIP: adpOl
description: common Perl modules not in core Perl
userid: KEVINRICE (Kevin J. Rice)
chapterid: 25 (Bundles)
communities:
classrooms at major university,
