>>>>> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:37:50 -0600, brian d foy <brian.d....@gmail.com> >>>>> said:
> bundles are > ancient technology. Task::* is the way to go now. :) Objection! Bundle:: and Task:: both have their merits. A Bundle can determine the order in which the objects get installed. It may name distributions directly, so can extend into unindexed territory. And a Bundle:: updates its collected modules to highest available version number. While you may be right that Task:: is appropriate in this case time is not yet ripe for Bundle:: bashing:) -- andreas
