Original Message-
From: brian d foy [mailto:brian.d@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 October 2011 16:48
To: GARLAND DUNCAN
Subject: Re: Maintaining Modules
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In articl
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article
,
GARLAND DUNCAN wrote:
> Thanks, but is there a list of modules which are acknowledged as needing
> maintenance on a priority basis? That might be better than me just picking a
Thanks, but is there a list of modules which are acknowledged as needing
maintenance on a priority basis? That might be better than me just picking a
few at random.
On 12 October 2011 19:45, brian d foy wrote:
> [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
> the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups"
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <004b01cc8671$f7c60d00$e7522700$@ntlworld.com>, "Duncan
Garland" wrote:
> I've come across several modules recently which appear to be unmaintained.
> Is one reason for this a
Hi,
I've come across several modules recently which appear to be unmaintained.
By that I mean modules with bugs which have been open for several years and
for which patches/solutions have been submitted but not applied.
Locale::Gettext, Locale::PO and Mail::Outlook are all in this category.
