of effort to engage the appropriate experts.
I assume the maintainers who read this email have the best and broadest
perspective about whether this approach makes sense. I look forward to
your response.
Thanks again!
Sincerely,
Jim Schueler - TQISJIM
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Jim Schueler wrote
worked out.
Otherwise, I've been struggling for some time trying to think of an
alternative. The one I dislike the least is DBIx.Storable.NoSQL because I
think of this module as an RDB equivalent of the Storable module.
In summary... help!
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Jim Schueler - TQISJIM
rename the module and
meditate on my design a little longer.
Thanks,
-Jim
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, _brian_d_foy wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Schueler
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have two modules I wish to contribute:
> >
> >
Per your recent email...
-Jim
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:35:00 +0100
From: Paul Marquess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: BerkeleyDB::Tie module
Hi Jim,
sorry for the delay it getting back to you. I was
I would like to contribute to CPAN. I am following the instructions
listed on page http://www.cpan.org/modules/04pause.html#registering.
Name: Jim Schueler
Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage (currently unavailable): http://www.tqis.com/
Preferred user-ID: TQISJIM
I have two modules I