Re: Ownership change

2002-11-11 Thread Chris Nandor
tion an announce list. Does that still exist ? Yes, there is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Ownership change

2002-11-11 Thread Chris Nandor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please fix that. Thanks, -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: [MacPerl-Modules] DBD-pg 1.13 on Mac OS X 10.2

2002-09-20 Thread Chris Nandor
This list is for MacPerl, the port of perl for Mac OS (versions 7 through 9), which is not the same as perl on Mac OS X. Please see the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for discussion of perl on Mac OS X. http://lists.perl.org/ -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [MacPerl-Modules] Can't "use Mac::OSA::Simple"

2002-07-17 Thread Chris Nandor
leased a new version of MacPerl. I too am surprised no one else has noticed it, or at least, not mentioned it. >Simply adding "$REVISION" on line 5 of the module, in the "use vars" >statement, fixes it, but *this sucks*. The good thing it is that it is an easy fix f

Re: Namespace problem... suggestions?

2002-03-01 Thread Chris Nandor
n't quite a useful module for most people regardless, as modules seem to work best when they aren't a hodgepodge like this is. Perhaps name it DocG::Toolbox ? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Parse::Perl? PSP::? erm... help with namespace for perlparser required

2002-02-12 Thread Chris Nandor
ntirely descriptive. Perl::Source? I'd tend to think it should go under Perl::, in any event. But then again, maybe that's too presumptuous (maybe something that "tied" to Perl should be approved by a pumpking)? If so, maybe Source::Perl? Parse::Source::Perl? -- Chris Nan

Re: Need some namespace

2002-01-31 Thread Chris Nandor
I'd also recommend something for Windows XP go under Win32::. Anyone else with thoughts? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Need some namespace

2002-01-31 Thread Chris Nandor
r OSX would be OK. I would prefer Mac::Cocoa::. There is already a plan for a Mac::Carbon. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: New module Net::Libnet

2002-01-22 Thread Chris Nandor
ly, I don't have any alternate suggestions for you, but Net::Libnet is just bad. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Namespace [Was: Re: MacOSX::File]

2002-01-14 Thread Chris Nandor
tc. This would be Mac::Carbon::Something in that case ... -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Namespace [Was: Re: MacOSX::File]

2002-01-14 Thread Chris Nandor
At 11:44 -0500 2002.01.14, John Gruber wrote: >Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 1/14/02 at 9:27a: > >> Yes, I agree it is confusing. I am not crazy about MacOSX, but can think >> of nothing better, so I am not objecting. > >I have a feeling that "Mac

Re: Namespace [Was: Re: MacOSX::File]

2002-01-14 Thread Chris Nandor
the module, and I am not saying the module as it exists is wrong in any way. But the issue of duplicated functionality and compatability (as well as the issues of what File::Copy etc. should do) need to be addressed, so that we all know what direction things are headed, and so that interested parties have a chance to weigh in. Thanks, -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Re: Module submission Time::SZTime

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Nandor
nd my position. Sure. Please make a note of how it is different from Time::HiRes in your docs, though, because surely others will want to know. :-) Thanks, -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Module submission Time::SZTime

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Nandor
han unixtime which >was not precise enough for my development. So it might helps others >too. Some of the Modules i am gonna to publish soon will require >this Module also. What is SZTime? Why not Time::HiRes, which is going to be included with perl 5.8? -- Chris Nandor

Re: Tie::File module

2001-12-12 Thread Chris Nandor
? >P.S. I'd still suggest that some general policy is probably worth having, >regardless of how this particular module name is resolved... Yeah, probably. :) -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Reclaiming abandoned Perl module names?

2001-11-28 Thread Chris Nandor
At 18:29 -0500 2001.11.28, Deven T. Corzine wrote: >Is there a procedure in place for reclaiming abandoned Perl modules names >that are listed in the modules list, but were never uploaded to CPAN? What module(s) are you thinking of? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PRO

Re: Module submission SENDMAIL

2001-11-27 Thread Chris Nandor
ng to do with sendmail the MTA. But the module has existed for quite some time, it wouldn't do to change it now. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Module submission SENDMAIL

2001-11-27 Thread Chris Nandor
Mail::SMI", since SMI is now an acronym (cf: Net::SMTP, etc.). Thanks, -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Module submission SENDMAIL

2001-11-27 Thread Chris Nandor
:26 2001 GMT > >The resulting entry would be: > >SENDMAIL SdpOg Simple Personal Mail Module DFROZ There's already a module called Mail::Sendmail. This module should not be in all caps, it should be under Mail::, and it shouldn't have the same n

Re: Slash namespace

2001-10-04 Thread Chris Nandor
At 21:56 +0200 2001.10.04, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:29:09 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > At 15:30 +0200 2001.09.27, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >> I'm asking because there are pending registrations

Re: Slash namespace

2001-09-27 Thread Chris Nandor
ing if there's anything that should be done with Slash to get those modules "registered". I don't have much experience with distributions like this on CPAN; I normally just deal with plain old module distributions. Any thoughts? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PR

Re: Slash namespace

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Nandor
the Slash distribution, which is not really designed at this point to be put on CPAN in the modules section. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: [MacPerl-Modules] Thread Manager?

2001-09-16 Thread Chris Nandor
:) Then any ol' MacPerl with the right Gestalt could >potentially use threads. Sorry for my late reply. I don't know a lot about threads, so I am not the one to ask about this. You might get a better answer on macperl-porters (or not :), but that is the place to discuss it regar

Re: PAUSE updates

2001-08-27 Thread Chris Nandor
the "module update" stuff, that >too. Or if /dev/null is too strong a measure, perhaps a separate >[EMAIL PROTECTED] list for those who actually care? I definitely still want the module update notices, although new module notices are more important to me. -- Chris Nandor

Re: I'm here.

2001-08-26 Thread Chris Nandor
At 16:25 -0400 2001.08.26, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote: >On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:17:16PM -0400, Chris Nandor wrote: >| >| While I agree with the first sentence, I don't agree with the second, >| necessarily. First, there is no MacOS::, it is Mac::. ;-) Secondly

Re: I'm here.

2001-08-26 Thread Chris Nandor
ails that come through here (I think). I think the general rationale is that given enough list members, each of the important mails will get read by *someone*. *grin* I only read what I can, when I can, if I have something to contribute. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Module submission Template::TPL

2001-08-08 Thread Chris Nandor
already a lot of modules under the Template:: namespace, all belonging to Template Toolkit, and there's a lot of room here for confusion and conflict. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: [MacPerl-Modules] (fwd) Re: Trouble Finding Parse::RecDescentfor Perl 5.004

2001-08-08 Thread Chris Nandor
At 12:52 +0200 2001.08.08, Bart Lateur wrote: >There have been questions here before, about finding a version of >Parse::RecDescent that is MacPerl compatible. BTW, Parse::RecDescent works fine on MacPerl 5.6.1a4. At least, it should. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PRO

Re: Module submission Speech::Recognition::ViaVoice

2001-07-14 Thread Chris Nandor
han aesthetically/semantically ideal... I personally feel that neither is necessarily better (David's points were all good) and therefore I would prefer to defer to the preexisting namespace. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Develop

Re: Change owners of modules

2001-05-03 Thread Chris Nandor
At 15:32 +0200 2001.05.03, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >Not as it is programmed now. PAUSE would answer: > >ERROR: The submission didn't succeed due to the following reason: > > Dist C/CN/CNANDOR/AudioCD-0.20.tar.gz, current version 0.20 has > been uploaded by CNANDOR. Please contact CN

Change owners of modules

2001-05-02 Thread Chris Nandor
guess they can be registered by others in this manner by someone(s) else? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Naming of the NEXT module

2001-04-11 Thread Chris Nandor
At 08:03 +1000 2001.04.12, Damian Conway wrote: >Since there's been no reply in the last two days, I'm going to >take silence as indicting consent, and release the NEXT as NEXT.pm Fine, YOU DO THAT! Really. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http:/

Re: CDDB_get.pm

2001-03-28 Thread Chris Nandor
CD. Seems Audio::CD::CDDB might best, though I know that's kinda annoying. Cc: to Rocco Caputo, author of CDDB. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: [MacPerl-Modules] CPAN Error

2001-03-27 Thread Chris Nandor
t install Bundle::CPAN. Did you install cpan-mac? If not, you need to. You need Compress::Zlib and more from that (well, you could install everything individually). Also, note in the cpan-mac README about not installing Bundles. Maybe I should patch CPAN.pm to not print that message on MacOS. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: request for namespace for modules that provide layers for thenew perlio system

2001-02-22 Thread Chris Nandor
entifying modules as PerlIO::. That is, I don't really know much about what modules in PerlIO:: would be. Would all of them be regarding data transformations using the PerlIO functionality? If so, then that seems fine to me. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://

Re: Perl SSH Client

2001-01-29 Thread Chris Nandor
ntation. I think people have come to expect Net::${PRTOTOCOL} modules to be Perl/XS/etc. implementations of that protocol. This is quite unfortunate, IMO. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Potential module - Module::Interface??

2000-11-29 Thread Chris Nandor
since it is in the perl core. But you might want to ping Jarkko about it first, or just see if anyone here thinks it is a bad idea, before proceeding. Sometimes discussing ideas like that in p5p can be ... counterproductive. :) -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pud

Re: Potential module - Module::Interface??

2000-11-29 Thread Chris Nandor
At 9:23 -0800 2000.11.29, Nathan Wiger wrote: >Chris Nandor wrote: >> >> Well, h2xs already creates a reasonable module framework, which I think is >> just fine. If people used it, we would not have a lot of the problems we >> have, and I don't see people usin

Re: Potential module - Module::Interface??

2000-11-28 Thread Chris Nandor
opposed to the idea, I just don't know if it will accomplish the goal you want to accomplish. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: MP3::TAG and MP3::ID3v1Tag

2000-11-18 Thread Chris Nandor
have one at SourceForge that could be used, http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/mp3-info-discuss) and we can discuss what our technical requirements are, what interfaces we want, and how we can merge the existing codebases together to achieve it all. -- Chris Nandor [

Re: Emotion

2000-11-16 Thread Chris Nandor
>Uh, well, it's a little hard to describe. I'm not sure which category >is most appropriate. > >See http://why-compete.org for details. There is nothing on the main page, that I see, that relates to an Emotion module. Can you be more specific? -- Chris Nandor

Re: HTML::Tree, my suggestion

2000-11-10 Thread Chris Nandor
At 3:48 +0100 2000.11.10, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >Opinions? That's the opinion I gave, so I obviously agree. :) -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-09 Thread Chris Nandor
wer is needed. It had always been the hope that the members of the Perl community would be reasonable in such issues, but it is clear that this won't always be the case. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-09 Thread Chris Nandor
At 9:45 -0800 2000.11.09, Paul J. Lucas wrote: >On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote: > >> I wrote: >> >So essentially I'm being asked to pay for his mistake of >> >misnaming his module/distribution ... > >> If that is how you prefer to see it, th

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-09 Thread Chris Nandor
At 8:30 -0800 2000.11.09, Paul J. Lucas wrote: >On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote: > >> You are arguing at one time against confusion, > >I'm not arguing anything. I never started this whole argument. Yes, you are. You are arguing that your names should get to remai

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-09 Thread Chris Nandor
many people have come to know and expect it. I think the most reasonable solution is to have a dummy HTML::Tree module in his distribution, thereby unifying the name with the distribution. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-08 Thread Chris Nandor
ould not be part of the name). Yes, it shouldn't, but a name also shouldn't be the same as another name. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-07 Thread Chris Nandor
that you took a name that was essentially already taken. You seem to be interested in taking a name that is not confusing, but that is exactly what you are doing, so that is an argument you cannot possibly win. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Sourc

Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

2000-11-07 Thread Chris Nandor
me, actually. About as good as Apache, Tk, and others. It is a unique label that people have come to know. > I don't want to > pick a meaningless name just so it's unique. Sorry. The problem is that when you pick an existing name for another purpose, it becomes de facto

Uh Oh

2000-10-20 Thread Chris Nandor
modules of the last several days that I try. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Missing Module

2000-10-18 Thread Chris Nandor
RCE/ >nor > http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/Filesys/ > >Thanks > -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Need help in selecting a module name.

2000-09-21 Thread Chris Nandor
on. Not that "Open" means much there, but I'd want to have the module in a place with other finance modules (i.e., Finance::). -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: how to name Tom's modules?

2000-09-14 Thread Chris Nandor
r something. How about a Tom::Tools namespace? :-) You could do Module::Tools and Pod::Tools. Maybe PPT could be in Power::Tools, POSIX::Tools, Unix::Tools? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: HTML_Tree and HTML::Tree and HTML-Tree

2000-09-13 Thread Chris Nandor
the same thing. It seems kinda silly, but probably the best route to take. Ideally, the name of one or the other (dist / module) would be changed, but that probably has more problems than this, which just has the problem of being a little bit silly. :-) -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL

Re: HTML_Tree and HTML::Tree and HTML-Tree

2000-09-12 Thread Chris Nandor
led HTML-TreeBuilder, since that's the nae of the module. Oh well. Thanks, -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: what modules do i have?

2000-09-01 Thread Chris Nandor
pmall, in pmtools. http://doriath.perl.com/misc/pmtools-1.00.tar.gz -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Net::Whois::RIPE namespace proposal?

2000-08-30 Thread Chris Nandor
. :-) Anyway, I don't know anything about RIPE and don't know if collaboration with Dana is warranted or necessary. There's no official protocol for it; we trust that you all can work it out. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Ope

Re: Net::Whois::RIPE namespace proposal?

2000-08-29 Thread Chris Nandor
followed by pointers to the references. Thanks, -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/

Re: Net::AIM namespace collision, (seemingly) abandoned olderproject

2000-07-14 Thread Chris Nandor
tact him and ask if he is willing to surrender the name to you. Although, if his module seems to be in some significant use, that might not be appropriate, unless you had the same interface. Otherwise, then another name for your module might be best. -- Chris Nandor | [EMA

Re: Class::WhiteHole

2000-07-07 Thread Chris Nandor
favors_ them. :) -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/

Re: Class::WhiteHole

2000-07-07 Thread Chris Nandor
oAutoInherit or something? Or maybe Class::LetsComeUpWithANameJavaProgrammersWouldBeProudOf ;) -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/

Re: PAUSE registration, module naming

2000-07-06 Thread Chris Nandor
uggest I use? If neither of these seems >acceptable, what would you suggest? Because it is such a common acronym, I'd think Net::IM or Net::AIM might be acceptable, though I am fairly sure others will disagree. -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pu

GD bad info

2000-06-30 Thread Chris Nandor
In modlist.data, it says for GD: GIF editing/painting/manipulation It should be (according to the module POD): Interface to Gd Graphics Library -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/

Re: RFC: How to name date objects module?

2000-06-27 Thread Chris Nandor
I've already given my opinion on the matter and don't want to keep restating it, so I'll keep it brief, I hope. At 8.28 +0200 2000.06.27, Steffen Beyer wrote: >Hello Chris Nandor, in a previous mail you wrote: >> Note that "Date::Object" tells me not a jot

Re: RFC: How to name date objects module?

2000-06-26 Thread Chris Nandor
more comfort. >4> Therefore I still need a good name for the OO frontend module. I think that possibly one does not exist. Now, Date::Calc::Simple or Date::Calc::Easy might be better ... but it might also be misleading, if the only difference is that it is OOP. Maybe there is not a

Re: CDDB_get

2000-06-08 Thread Chris Nandor
it maybe fits under Audio. Cdrom would >also be ok. what do you think? > >Audio::CDDB > >is this possible with the other CDDB.pm in mind? >is it useful? What does your module do, again? -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover

"free" modules

2000-05-21 Thread Chris Nandor
I saw this in the perl-mumps distribution: >This package is free for use but not modification. This includes >production commercial use. So it just caused me to wonder, is there a policy about stuff on CPAN being "free"? -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: module CDDB-0.9.tar.gz

2000-05-18 Thread Chris Nandor
that has to change. Yeah, or else anyone can take over any namespace on search.cpan.org. -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/

Re: module CDDB-0.9.tar.gz

2000-05-17 Thread Chris Nandor
/RC/RCAPUTO/CDDB-1.03.tar.gz I see two problems. One, that someone was allowed to upload CDDB other than Rocco (that seems to me to be a bug, but I could be wrong). The other is that somehow FONKIE and KRAEHE have the exact same distribution. Perhaps KRAEHE mistakenly claimed it as his own after

Re: module CDDB-0.9.tar.gz

2000-05-17 Thread Chris Nandor
t search.cpan.org to see if it already exists. Although this seems like it may be a PAUSE bug; I thought that no one could upload "DistName-\d+.\d+.tar.gz" if DistName already belonged to another author. -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.ne

Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/

2000-05-11 Thread Chris Nandor
w indexes > rmtreee ANDK > ln -s A/AN/ANDK . > >The gory details available on request. Every hour we will copy one >author's directory and will cause considerable extra traffic and many >deletions. Please help me watch this process to prevent accidents. So will the ol

Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK

2000-05-01 Thread Chris Nandor
gt;> Apache:: prefix... > >Well... maybe. ;-) > >It should be possible to distribute it as AxKit-X.XX.tar.gz, but have it >install as Apache::AxKit::*, right? Yes. You can have a distribution called, for example, MailTools or libnet or TimeDate without a MailTools.pm or libnet.pm or TimeDate.pm (Hi, Graham!). -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/

Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK

2000-05-01 Thread Chris Nandor
t that all of the above are sins, beause some of them aren't. 2. I don't know what a "product" is. >As for being "widely known, standards, etc", well I hope to make the first >one of those a reality in the near future with a number of articles in &g

Re: WAP module namespace

2000-05-01 Thread Chris Nandor
me hierachy to choose. >> I would like the WAP:: toplevel name, with my individual modules >> released at second level as they get contributed. > >Sounds good. What does 'WAP' stand for? Wireless Application Protocol. There's also WML, Wireless Markup La

Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK

2000-05-01 Thread Chris Nandor
names, and I do not like acronyms for top-level names (unless they are widely known, standards, etc.). FWIW, that wouldn't mean needing to change the name of the mailing list, and fixing the modules and docs is almost as easy as a global one-liner. :-) -- Chris Nandor | [EMA

Re: [OFF TOPIC] Anyone at modules@perl.org ?

2000-04-28 Thread Chris Nandor
re, sign me up. I don't know how much time I can devote, but the worst-case scenario is I won't be any less available than anyone else. ;-) -- Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/

Re: Seeking module name guidance: MPEG::Napster

2000-02-23 Thread Chris Nandor
about simlultaneous release of the same module under two different names? -- Chris Nandor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6'])

Re: Seeking module name guidance: MPEG::Napster

2000-02-22 Thread Chris Nandor
what I was sorta thinking. I just hate to screw with that damned ontology axis. But I see three votes for MP3::, so I would not be opposed to changing MPEG::MP3Info to MP3::Info. Please advise me on how this should be handled; it is a fairly well-used module, and such a change will surely

Re: Seeking module name guidance: MPEG::Napster

2000-02-22 Thread Chris Nandor
no. Orwant, are any of us treading down the path to hell here? :D -- Chris Nandor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6'])