Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-25 Thread Tels
On Mon, March 21, 2011 6:09 pm, Ron Savage wrote: > Hi Tels > > I'm copying others in this reply. Ido this too, if I forgot someone, apologies, I am on a somewhat-crappy webmail interface :) > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:10 -0400, Tels wrote: >> Sorry, >> >> I only got a few emails which are probab

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-24 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Tels On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 14:52 -0400, Tels wrote: > On Mon, March 21, 2011 6:09 pm, Ron Savage wrote: > > Hi Tels > > > > I'm copying others in this reply. > > Ido this too, if I forgot someone, apologies, I am on a somewhat-crappy > webmail interface :) Understand. I have problems with mai

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-21 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Tels I'm copying others in this reply. On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:10 -0400, Tels wrote: > Sorry, > > I only got a few emails which are probably not in order, so I haven't read > everything. But I'll reply anyway :) > > On Sat, March 19, 2011 7:16 pm, Ron Savage wrote: > > Hi Shlomi > > > > Let

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-20 Thread dhudes
In terms of considering parser improvements or reimplementation, the first step is to come up with a formal grammar for the language. Preferably a Context Free Grammar (CFG) expressed in BNF or EBNF. Once we have that we have options - any of several Perl implementations including Parse::Yapp / Par

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-20 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Shlomi On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 22:57 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi Ron, > > On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 01:16:32 Ron Savage wrote: > > Hi Shlomi > > > > Let me say things in different words. > > > > Our primary goal is ensuring the future of the module, right? > > > > yes. > > > To me, this impl

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-20 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Ron, On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 01:16:32 Ron Savage wrote: > Hi Shlomi > > Let me say things in different words. > > Our primary goal is ensuring the future of the module, right? > yes. > To me, this implies any of these items /might/ be jettisoned: > > o Pure-Perl > o Current parser > o Curre

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-19 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Shlomi Let me say things in different words. Our primary goal is ensuring the future of the module, right? To me, this implies any of these items /might/ be jettisoned: o Pure-Perl o Current parser o Current input format So, I'd like the discussion to focus on choosing the best tools to sup

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-19 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Shlomi On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 08:33 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi Ron (and all), > > thanks for your willingness to contribute to Graph-Easy. I'm CCing this > message to the module-authors mailing list and to Tels, who is the originator > of http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph-Easy/ . Everybod

Re: The future of Graph::Easy

2011-03-18 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Ron (and all), thanks for your willingness to contribute to Graph-Easy. I'm CCing this message to the module-authors mailing list and to Tels, who is the originator of http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph-Easy/ . Everybody, Ron has commented on my blog. On Monday 14 Mar 2011 23:32:20 LiveJourn