Hi Tels

I'm copying others in this reply.

On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:10 -0400, Tels wrote:
> Sorry,
> 
> I only got a few emails which are probably not in order, so I haven't read
> everything. But I'll reply anyway :)
> 
> On Sat, March 19, 2011 7:16 pm, Ron Savage wrote:
> > Hi Shlomi
> >
> > Let me say things in different words.
> >
> > Our primary goal is ensuring the future of the module, right?
> >
> > To me, this implies any of these items /might/ be jettisoned:
> >
> > o Pure-Perl
> 
> This would be only a choice of speed (e.g. you could have a transparent XS
> module, or C::Inline). However, when Pure-Perl works, why throw it away?

Shlomi Fish describes his position here, together with my (initial)
reply:

http://community.livejournal.com/shlomif_tech/57021.html


> > o Current parser
> 
> The parser might not be the best, but what exactly are your problems with it?

Maintenance.

> > o Current input format
> 
> If you throw away the Graph::Easy input format, you will have killed the
> module's spirit. The *entire* point of Graph::Easy is the
> easy-to-write-easy-to-read input format. Everything else is just to keep
> it being useful.

Understood. The aim is to support some simple syntax, but (from my point
of view) not necessarily the current syntax.

> > So, I'd like the discussion to focus on choosing the best tools to
> > support the module.
> >
> > Thus, I'm saying the current input format, e.g., is not driving the
> > discussion, but rather the search for tools is.
> >
> > That in turn means that if a different parser is chosen, then changing
> > the input format would be a consequence (i.e. not a driver) of that
> > choice.
> 
> Why then not write your very own module, where you have the choice of your
> own format, own parser and own language? I mean, you might as well use
> graphviz, it is written in C, has a different parser AND a different input
> format?

Good point.

And if that were to happen, I for one would certainly want to maintain
the great spirit of Graph::Easy's design.

> Sorry, but I don't understand the force behind this at all.
> 
> all the best,
> 
> tels
> 
> 

-- 
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
Ph: 0421 920 622

Reply via email to