On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:31:30 -0200 (EDT), Sergio Salvi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Run "perl -V" on both hosts and check if there are any differences
> between the output, mainly on "Platform" and "Compile-time options" sections.
>
> Also, you could create a simple perl script (like "$x++ for (1..
Run "perl -V" on both hosts and check if there are any differences
between the output, mainly on "Platform" and "Compile-time options" sections.
Also, you could create a simple perl script (like "$x++ for (1..100)")
and Benchmark them on both hosts.
HTH,
Sergio.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Alex G
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:39 -0800, Jay Scherrer wrote:
> With FC3 and SElinux threads are more prevalent. I thought thats why I
> was upgrading to Apache2. Use of better threading technology.
On Linux, I recommend you use preforking, not threads, with mod_perl 2.
It uses far less memory than th
Why are you using Apache1.3?
Have tried compiling Apache2 with MP2?
With FC3 and SElinux threads are more prevalent. I thought thats why I
was upgrading to Apache2. Use of better threading technology.
On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:15 am, Alex Greg wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Recently I've upgraded on
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:47:54 -0500
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it would be cool to make an FC3 RPM of Perl built with the best
> options that installs into a non-conflicting location available for
> download. Hmmm, if it was compiled with Intel's compiler for a little
> more
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:40:20 -0500, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:35 +, Alex Greg wrote:
> > Any further advice would be appreciated, before I take the next step
> > and compile my own Perl.
>
> The final variable here is the kernel. There may be somethi
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:01 -0700, John D. Sanders wrote:
> Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity. Is it
> better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
> source or should I use what ships and just add to it.
The way you do it depends on your local admin
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:35:12 +
Alex Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been doing this as part of the standard install process -
> removing all unnecessary packages and services. The only network
> service running is SSH - this is the same as on the FC1 boxes.
> chkconfig --list on the FC3
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:35 +, Alex Greg wrote:
> Any further advice would be appreciated, before I take the next step
> and compile my own Perl.
The final variable here is the kernel. There may be something about the
kernel differences between the releases that favors apache's process
model.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:40:01 -0600, Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:27 +
> Alex Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Recently I've upgraded one of our mod_perl servers to Fedora Core 3
> > (the others are all running Fedora Core 1).
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:01:35 -0700
"John D. Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity. Is it
> better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
> source or should I use what ships and just add to it.
This is starting t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Perrin Harkins wr
ites:
>How can you tell, and what can you do about it? Any specific info would
>be greatly appreciated.
OS issues might be best pinpointed by benchmarking the two httpd's on the
two Fedora's but w/o modperl loaded.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:56:11 -0500
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
> > While I agree recompling Perl will help, you might also look into
> > whether or not SELinux is slowing you down.
>
> How can you tell, and what can you do
Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity. Is it
better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
source or should I use what ships and just add to it.
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
While I agree recompling Perl will he
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
> While I agree recompling Perl will help, you might also look into
> whether or not SELinux is slowing you down.
How can you tell, and what can you do about it? Any specific info would
be greatly appreciated.
Regarding recompiling perl,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:27 +
Alex Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Recently I've upgraded one of our mod_perl servers to Fedora Core 3
> (the others are all running Fedora Core 1).
>
>
> What I've found is that the Fedora Core 3 machine is consistently
> slower to respond than
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Greg writes:
>We're using the Fedora Perl packages (perl-5.8.3-16 on FC1,
>perl-5.8.5-9 on FC3), but I have compiled Apache and mod_perl on all
>the machines from source, with the following command:
If you build your own Perl from source, you can remove the pot
Hi,
Recently I've upgraded one of our mod_perl servers to Fedora Core 3
(the others are all running Fedora Core 1).
What I've found is that the Fedora Core 3 machine is consistently
slower to respond than the Fedora Core 1 machines:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# for f in web1 web2 web3 web4; do ec
18 matches
Mail list logo
