That's a good point. I will at least suggest it to them.
Scott
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 17:37 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 17:21 -0400, Scott Cain wrote:
> > That is a great idea and I will use it in the future. Unfortunately, it
> > doesn't really help my users who, while
Philip,
Thanks! That is very useful info--I will forward it to the turnkey
developers (it's not my project, just related to one I am working on).
Scott
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 17:26 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Scott Cain wrote:
>
> >I am using turnkey (http://turnkey.sf.net) which tries t
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 17:21 -0400, Scott Cain wrote:
> That is a great idea and I will use it in the future. Unfortunately, it
> doesn't really help my users who, while very bright, are not perl
> developers and would likely balk at doing that.
I do something similar to what Cliff has here. Ther
Scott Cain wrote:
I am using turnkey (http://turnkey.sf.net) which tries to do some fancy
footwork to determine which mod_perl is being used:
(note that Turnkey::Root::mod_perl_version parses $ENV{MOD_PERL} and
returns 2 if it looks like mod_perl 1.99+ or 1 otherwise):
Thats not going to run und
That is a great idea and I will use it in the future. Unfortunately, it
doesn't really help my users who, while very bright, are not perl
developers and would likely balk at doing that.
Thanks,
Scott
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 14:14 -0700, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
> Scott Cain wrote:
>
> >because I
I am using turnkey (http://turnkey.sf.net) which tries to do some fancy
footwork to determine which mod_perl is being used:
(note that Turnkey::Root::mod_perl_version parses $ENV{MOD_PERL} and
returns 2 if it looks like mod_perl 1.99+ or 1 otherwise):
if (Turnkey::Root::mod_perl_version( $ENV{MOD
Scott Cain wrote:
because I had to blow away my installation of mp1 to get my mp2 apps to
work.
I always build my servers with their own copy of perl in a directory
such as:
/usr/local/httpd_20050419
I build a fresh perl and apache in that directory, and get everything
working. My particular
Scott Cain wrote:
I did see the rename doc, though I didn't realize that it applied to
something as recent as the transition to RC4->RC5. Are you currently
using mp1 and mp2? What about any mp applications that were written
prior to this name change? Of course, I can't do any testing myself,
be
I did see the rename doc, though I didn't realize that it applied to
something as recent as the transition to RC4->RC5. Are you currently
using mp1 and mp2? What about any mp applications that were written
prior to this name change? Of course, I can't do any testing myself,
because I had to blo
Sc
So, the question is: is it possible (and relatively easy) to have
mod_perl1 and mod_perl2 installed on the same machine?
Try mod_perl2.00 RC5 seems to work for me :)
MP_APACHE2_INST=1 is gone.
mod_perl.pm is installed as mod_perl2.pm
and mp2 libs are in Apache2:: directory and namespace by de
Hello,
I imagine that this question has been asked before, but my google skills
are failing me at the moment. Here's the thing: I have users who would
like to keep their apache1/mp1 setup in place while they work on the
same machine testing apache2/mp2. When I tried to do a similar thing a
month
11 matches
Mail list logo
