That's a good point. I will at least suggest it to them. Scott
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 17:37 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 17:21 -0400, Scott Cain wrote: > > That is a great idea and I will use it in the future. Unfortunately, it > > doesn't really help my users who, while very bright, are not perl > > developers and would likely balk at doing that. > > I do something similar to what Cliff has here. There's nothing special > for the users to know except the URL of the server they want to talk to. > > You already need to install a separate apache for mod_perl 2 anyway, so > installing a separate perl doesn't seem like a big extra to me, although > technically it is not needed for many things anymore now that modules go > into the Apache2:: namespace. I prefer to have a separate perl so that > I know for certain which modules I'm using and can port things without > breaking the existing code. > > - Perrin > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Scott Cain, Ph. D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GMOD Coordinator (http://www.gmod.org/) 216-392-3087 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
