Hello,
Richard F. Rebel wrote:
I sent a message just prior to this that contained a forward from the
linux kernel mailing list that explains this further, but:
The method you are using to check changed with 2.6.10 and may readily
account for the changes you are seeing in your figures.
In the end, y
Stas,
As far as the kernel issue goes, you are right there has been changes.
The meaning of 'SHARE' pages reported by the Linux kernel has changed
over time. This does not necessarily mean your processes aren't sharing
via COW pages, just in how the kernel reports them.
I posted a response from
Hi Kurt,
I sent a message just prior to this that contained a forward from the
linux kernel mailing list that explains this further, but:
The method you are using to check changed with 2.6.10 and may readily
account for the changes you are seeing in your figures.
In the end, you should not be u
I plugged vmonitor in the mp2 test suite (which loads a lot of modules)
and the conclusions are as following:
perl Size Share VSize Rss
non-threaded: 24.8M 8.3M 24.8M 20.6M
threaded: 30.4M 8.6M 30.4M 26.2M
both running perl 5.8.6 under prefork mpm.
so you can see that while ther
Perrin Harkins wrote:
I wonder if it has something to do with SMP. It would be good to try it
on a kernel that is not compiled for SMP. It might be worth compiling
your own kernel to test it.
Running a non-threaded perl is always a good idea if you are not using
threads. Performance will be bett
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 16:23 -0500, Kurt Hansen wrote:
> What do y'all think would be my most fruitful next step, besides testing
> out a new machine? Should I switch to static mp2? Non-threaded perl?
> Eliminating perl modules to see if there is one causing the problem? Prayer?
I wonder if it ha
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 12:54 -0500, Kurt Hansen wrote:
Thanks for the help. I do preload almost all the modules in the
startup.pl file. Here it is
This looks okay to me. I have sometimes seen behavior like what you're
experiencing on specific machines and not on other
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 12:54 -0500, Kurt Hansen wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I do preload almost all the modules in the
> startup.pl file. Here it is
This looks okay to me. I have sometimes seen behavior like what you're
experiencing on specific machines and not on others, while running
identica
Stas Bekman wrote:
Kurt Hansen wrote:
I'm having problems getting modules loaded at Apache start to be
shared across the children. Here's the output I get from
Apache::VMonitor (I've editted down to just 2 children):
Size Share VSize RSS M Elapsed LastReq Srvd
- - - -- -- --
Kurt Hansen wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems getting modules loaded at Apache start to be shared
across the children. Here's the output I get from Apache::VMonitor (I've
editted down to just 2 children):
Size Share VSize RSS M Elapsed LastReq Srvd
- - - -- --
Hello,
I'm having problems getting modules loaded at Apache start to be shared
across the children. Here's the output I get from Apache::VMonitor (I've
editted down to just 2 children):
Size Share VSize RSS M Elapsed LastReq Srvd
- - - -- -- --
12: 89.
11 matches
Mail list logo