I forgot to mention, lighttpd consumes about 12 megs of RAM with my config.
It's very small because it uses non-blocking sockets to do everything with a
single thread.
On Nov 6, 2007 1:17 PM, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't overstate the efficiency gains f
e-proxy or am I missing out on
> something, would a reverse-proxy help us with our setup. We are unable to
> cache content and hit live databases for every dynamic page we serve.
> Images, js and css are all served from a slimmed down apache server so
> these
> aren't a problem.
&g
gt; mod_perl applications that have a version for Windows and one for Linux?
>
> I need to develop under Windows and use in production under Linux, and I
> would like to use the same setup.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Octavian
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Mark Maunder &
res compiling your own kernel, in
> an age where that's no longer very common. Even getting 4GB of RAM to
> work in 32-bit Linux was fairly tricky until recently.
>
> There's a summary of information about memory limits in 32-bit Linux here:
> http://www.spack.org/wiki/LinuxRamLimits
>
> - Perrin
>
--
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://markmaunder.com/
+1-206-6978723
one 200Mb on the 64 bit servers. I'm
> sure we are going wrong somewhere.
>
>
>
>
>
> Many Thanks.
>
> GS
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.11 - Release Date: 25/10/2007
> 00:00
>
--
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://markmaunder.com/
+1-206-6978723
based on
Perrin's suggestions yesterday. Thanks to you guys, for the first time
in 10 days I didn't get any timeout warnings this morning during our
peak hour from our site monitor - and our traffic increases daily.
Thanks again!!
Mark.
On 10/17/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
y it seems you're emulating the threaded model
with lots of lightweight connection handlers and a few heavyweight
processes that are quickly freed up after doing the heavy lifting for
each connection.
Mark.
On 10/17/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Mark M
Hi,
I may have missed some data earlier in this thread but, a few questions:
It sounds like you're trying to use a mod_perl handler to read the
location header from the client? Why are you doing this if your
objective is to redirect the client to another page. Shouldn't you be
sending the client
#x27;s memory usage and of course it solves my original problem (so far
anyway) of the number of processes doubling for an unknown reason. It
also seems to be a little more CPU efficient.
Thanks very much for all the help!!
Mark.
On 10/16/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O
Hi Perrin,
Thanks so much for the quick reply. I've commented your original email below:
On 10/16/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My mod_perl app works with some fairly
> > large data struct
che? then memcached. Are they important? Then some
> sort of shared memory, BDB, SQLite or MySQL might be more appropriate.
>
> --
> Michael Peters
> Developer
> Plus Three, LP
>
>
--
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://markmaunder.com/
+1-206-6978723
my
config because my app is smaller than most apps I've written.
BTW, most of my app is written as handlers and all modules are loaded
in startup.pl.
Regards,
Mark.
On 10/16/07, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks guys. I assumed worker would save me memory bec
I agree, if you're
> concerned about memory, don't use threads. Prefork will save you
> memory because of copy-on-write.
>
> - Perrin
>
--
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://markmaunder.com/
+1-206-6978723
Hi All,
I have a high traffic mod_perl2 web server (40 requests/second and all
are dynamic data - no images or static html) and I have a slow memory
leak in mod_perl2. I haven't tracked the leak down yet, but to deal
with it I have set MaxRequestsPerChild to 5000. I'm using the worker
MPM with the
up
with a sense of humor, click here:
<http://www.grist.org/signup/>
--
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1-206-6978723
Hi all,
This was going to be a post asking for help but I just solved it. If
you're building mod_perl2 statically and get:
"Can't find apr include/ directory"
and it's driving you nuts because you're untarring a clean mod_perl, a
clean httpd, and you're making no reference to any existing
direc
this helps someone else.
Also... Is there a mod_perl wiki for brain dumps like these?
On 10/19/06, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
This was going to be a post asking for help but I just solved it. If
you're building mod_perl2 statically and get:
"Can't find
Come to think of it, you'll want to combine mod_rewrite and mod_proxy
- I think there's an example of how to do this on the mod_rewrite
docs.
On 10/19/06, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris,
I've done something like this with mod_proxy. You can map url&#x
Thanks. I think the idea of sending a useless signal is the best so far.
I'm also going to upgrade my kernel and see if I can get more meaningful
output from ps.
btw, is anyone using the 2.6 kernel on live servers yet?
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 12:50, Render Web wrote:
> Mark Maunder wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 12:43, Ged Haywood wrote:
> If I read you right, this only happens when your Apache processes are
> inactive for some time. So why not set up a process which keeps them
> active, like a kind of watchdog? It would be very simple using LWP or
> something like that.
Definite
can't find
anything about mlock and apache.
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 11:33, Ged Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Mark Maunder wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to force apache to stay in memory.
>
> Don't mount the swap space?
>
> 73,
> Ged
Is there a way to force apache to stay in memory. My linux box swaps
children out (shown in brackets in ps) during long periods of low
activity, and swapping them back in is causing latency for my users.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl
I forgot about that. I guess once all Apache kids exist, there's no way
to overwrite that module in shared memory without restarting Apache?
Silly question I guess. That's why they call it copy-on-write.
mark.
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 13:15, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Mark Maunder wrote:
Thanks for this Charles. I've never heard of vmstat, and after playing
with it for a few mins am amazed at my ignorance and its usefulness.
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 21:07, Charles C. Fu wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 27 Feb 2004,
>Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
For what I'm doing the only performance hit is the stat() on every
module, which means disk access. That's 20 stats per request because
there are 20 modules. The 'touch' option means only one stat instead of
20. Much better.
Moving slightly OT. Anyone know if the linux filesystem cache caches
di
Hi,
In a perl handler, I'm doing a stat on a module file, and if the file
has been modified, I'm reloading the module by slurping the file into a
scalar and eval'ing it. The module has a few subs and global vars that
have defaults set on initialization. I have about 20 modules I'm doing
this with
Thanks very much Stas, and the list for the archived info.
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 02:43, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Mark Maunder wrote:
> > I'm creating some fairly big scalars (6 megs) under mod_perl containing
> > strings, and was doing some memory profiling using Apache::Status.
I'm creating some fairly big scalars (6 megs) under mod_perl containing
strings, and was doing some memory profiling using Apache::Status. I
noticed at the end of the memory usage for a particular sub, in a
module, there is a 'PADLIST summary', and that there is some hefty
memory usage by certain v
28 matches
Mail list logo
