Can I improve inefficiencies with using Storable freeze/thaw on 2-6MB hashes
assuming that all data in the hashes are necessary (for each session) and
changing every-so-often?
--> Is it possible to create an apache variable at server start-up that can be
referenced read/write by all forked chil
It apparently works after I played with the code for the final flush. I'm not
sure why, though. There was only one change (below). Anybody see a
significant difference?
In any case, I'll take it, since it works now. :-)
--Original (broken) code
$f->print(join '',
I'm using apache 1.3.33 and mod_perl 1.29.
I would have went apache 2 and mp 2 but I saw the mod_perl in beta
warning and wasn't sure if it was a good idea to use it in a production
environment.
Even if I had wanted to our host uses apache 1.3.33 and mod_perl 1.29 as
the default set up. On my O
we are talking about advocacy, so why not promoting mod_perl in any way if
it is possible and doesn't hurt anyone?
I also think that it would be a good idea to set an HTTP header by default
which announces mod_perl.
The winners are those who created bad but simple programs, simple
programming lang
Some advocacy ideas:
I think that there are a few groups we should target:
- The programmers/net admins that are already using mod_perl, but older
versions (Macromedia is using Apache 1.3 and mod_perl 1)
- the programmers that already know perl but they are using only CGI scripts
- The programmers
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 12:47 -0400, Adam Prime x443 wrote:
> > PHP uses: X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.11
> >
> > To effectively bypass the front end server problem.
>
> We decided not to do that, since it's intrusive.
>
PHP users can decide if that HTTP hea
On 26 Aug 2005 11:43:17 -0700
merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
> Perhaps if mod_perl announced itself by default, but a simple
> directive turned it off? Then at least the statistics for it would be
> in the same meaningless camp as mod_php. :)
I think that's a reasonable idea
Okay, I've tried the new filter on a Gentoo system: Apache 2.0.54-r13,
mod_perl 2.0.1-r2. It helped me to port the filter to the correct API (which
only required a couple of changes, thankfully), but it didn't fix the weird
IE problem.
I know I'm not alone in wanting this feature (being able t
> "Adam" == Adam Prime x443 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> Either way though, I think these numbers are useless for the
Adam> most part. I would guess that the vast majority of the sites
Adam> that have mod_perl or mod_php in their headers are mass hosting
Adam> providers that are running
http://www.php.net/usage.php
I can't find anything recent for java.
Either way though, I think these numbers are useless for the most part. I
would guess that the vast majority of the sites that have mod_perl or mod_php
in their headers are mass hosting providers that are running default in
Quoting Tony Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:36 -0500
> > Tony Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400
> > > > "Christopher H. L
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 12:47 -0400, Adam Prime x443 wrote:
> PHP uses: X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.11
>
> To effectively bypass the front end server problem.
We decided not to do that, since it's intrusive.
What I was asking about is whether anyone checked to see if the numbers
for other things seem t
PHP uses: X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.11
To effectively bypass the front end server problem.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 12:25 PM
To: Frank Wiles
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: survey
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 0
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:33:36 -0400
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not had time to work on it. What it still needs is
> incorporation of a Win32 success story that I have in bits and pieces
> in several e- mails. It's not a simple job to turn it into something
> coherent. If
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 09:41 -0500, Frank Wiles wrote:
> Perrin, if you need some help or need someone to take it over,
> I've got some time this weekend I could work on it. Let me know.
The document has been in the mod_perl docs subversion repository for a
while now, here:
http://svn.apache.o
Quoting Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Frank Wiles wrote:
>
> > We tried last year to get a mod_perl advocacy movement going,
> but
> > not to many people were interested in helping with it.
>
> There is a mailing list just for the advocacy movement here:
>
> http://perl.apache.org/mai
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 09:25 -0500, Frank Wiles wrote:
> 2) More and more sites moving to having light front-end Apache's
> that don't have mod_perl, but reverse proxy to backends that
> do.
There you go. None of the sites that I know run mod_perl, including my
own, have it in their f
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 10:54 -0500, Tony Clayton wrote:
> I've raised a bug on the Centos site for upgrading to mod_perl 2.0.1:
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1001
Doesn't Centos just track RHEL? I didn't think they offered any
additional packages. I believe it's Red Hat who would need to
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 10:32 -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts surprised that
> "mod_perl 2 is finished?".
Where do you see these? It was announced on Slashdot, which is about as
good as it gets for reaching actual programmers.
Frank Wiles wrote:
> We tried last year to get a mod_perl advocacy movement going, but
> not to many people were interested in helping with it.
There is a mailing list just for the advocacy movement here:
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/advocacy.html
The last post was in May, right before
Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:36 -0500
> Tony Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400
> > > "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Part of it may
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts surprised that
"mod_perl 2 is finished?".
-=Chris
Oh yeah. Last night I installed MP2 on a fresh FreeBSD5 install using
ports that used:
http://www.apache.org/dist/perl/mod_perl-2.0.1.tar.gz
This is sti
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:49:52 +0300
"Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think, why the number of hosts which use mod_perl is
> decreasing continuously as the following survey shows?
>
> http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html
We had a discussion about this
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:36 -0500
Tony Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400
> > "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts surprised
> > > t
Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400
> "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts surprised
> > that "mod_perl 2 is finished?".
>
> That could be as well. We should really get our 2.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400
"Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts surprised
> that "mod_perl 2 is finished?".
That could be as well. We should really get our 2.0 press release
out.
Perrin, if you need some hel
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:49:52 +0300
"Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you think, why the number of hosts which use mod_perl is
decreasing continuously as the following survey shows?
http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html
We had a disc
I'm receiving the following error when I startup apache:
[error] Can't load
'/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Apache2/RequestRec/RequestRec.so'
for module Apache2::RequestRec:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Apache2/RequestRec/RequestRec.so:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a config file which contains a hash ref and I get its values by using
> the do() function.
>
> I don't think this is the best solution, because the speed might be slow.
> That file is accessed on each access to each page.
>
> Is it possible to store tha
Use memcached, it just rocks and is just what you need...
http://www.danga.com/memcached/download.bml
Maybe you'll need this module...
needed module:
http://www.monkey.org/~provos/libevent/
If you get error when trying to start it, just symlink the libraries to the
place he expects it...
Denis
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> What do you think, why the number of hosts which use mod_perl is decreasing
> continuously as the following survey shows?
>
> http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html
Just a guess, but I think it might be related to the fact that some
servers moved to Apach
Hi,
I have a config file which contains a hash ref and I get its values by using
the do() function.
I don't think this is the best solution, because the speed might be slow.
That file is accessed on each access to each page.
Is it possible to store that hash in the memory somehow?
I can store t
What do you think, why the number of hosts which use mod_perl is decreasing
continuously as the following survey shows?
http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html
Teddy
Hello,
After upgrading to mod_perl 2.0.1 (from 1.99) I've got some problem
with custom script handlers (inherited from ModPerl::Registry) no
longer reports file access errors. It seems to boil down to the
$r->slurp_filename() method, which does not throw if the file can't
be opened/read for s
Wow, I hadn't realized there was such a big change that didn't make it to
Sarge. What a mess. Fortunately, there appears to be a backport; that'll
make things easy. Thanks for letting me know; that would have been a nasty
surprise.
Unforunately, it doesn't seem like that would cause my IE pr
Alexander Charbonnet wrote:
I'm running the Debian Sarge versions of everything: Apache 2.0.54-4, mod_perl
1.999.21-1.
I'd update to something after RC5 so that you don't use an unsupported API of
mod_perl2.
see:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/rename.html
--
END
Hi,
I'm in a situation where I need the ability to flush the output of my CGI
script to the client, so that it can display a partial page, and I also need
to use gzip compression (only if the client supports it, of course). This
could be done in Apache 1 by using Dynagzip.
I couldn't make the
37 matches
Mail list logo
