* Steven M. Schultz on Wednesday, July 05, 2006 at 21:30:15 -0700:
>> mpeg2enc.1 gives wrong long option names. AFAIK both
>> quantization/quantize and quantisation/quantise are correct
>> spellings; but as practice and
>
>
> I think the correct fix would have been to remove the -Q option ;
Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, [UTF-8] Bernhard Frühmesser wrote:
> "-s" is a "do nothing" option that will give a WARNING error but
> continume on, -s was removed a few minutes ago.
>
> -g is still a valid option. It may have been removed at one time
> b
Bernhard Frühmesser schrieb:
> You mean a but in yuvdeinterlace or in combination with an other
> programm / option?
No, clearly a bug in the deinterlacer itself. When using
top-field-first-processing, an empty buffer was spilled out. Rather
silly bug. I didn't notice it, as I am using (PAL-DV is b
Hello Steven,
have a nice holiday!
Please don't mind these (and the following) words, I know, that you have
a slightly different opinion towards interlacing than I have... That's
perfectly OK! So enjoy that little short-story below... :-) I could not
resist :-)
How it came to that interlaced-
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, stefan wrote:
> Hello Steven,
>
> have a nice holiday!
Thanks, I am!
> perfectly OK! So enjoy that little short-story below... :-) I could not
I've seen it before.
> How it came to that interlaced-video-bug (as far as I could get hands to
> the facts...)?
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, stefan wrote:
> BTW: I just checked in a modification to yuvdenoise, too. It is (at
> desire) capable to do a Motion-Compensation on the temporal-filter,
> again. Use -q to turn this on and be amazed how slow it renders...
You won't be happy until you have slowed yuvd
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, [UTF-8] Bernhard Fr??hmesser wrote:
> I have been playing around a bit with the -m and -M option(s) but i am
> not sure what they are good for, if i use them i get some weird graphics
They are median filters. The -m is applied BEFORE the -t. The -M
is appl
