Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex problem

2006-01-23 Thread Andrew Stevens
HI Bob, > > What happens if you mplex with the a some AC3 taken off the front of the > > sequence > > > > run > > > > tail --bytes=+179200 your_original.ac3 > shifted.ac3 > > tail? or head? Ran your tail command and it produced a shifted.ac3 file of > 23568384b (24 mb? - pretty drastic) Defi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex problem

2006-01-23 Thread Bob Stia
On Monday 23 January 2006 13:13, Andrew Stevens wrote: > HI Bob, > > > > What happens if you mplex with the a some AC3 taken off the front of > > > the sequence > > > > > > run > > > > > > tail --bytes=+179200 your_original.ac3 > shifted.ac3 > > > > tail? or head? Ran your tail command and it prod

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex problem

2006-01-23 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Bob Stia wrote: > OK ran mplex again with the new shifted.ac3. At least it did not fail > immediately. Here is the result: Something's a bit weird with the input video I think: > EasyStreet:/workspace # mplex -f 8 -o "movie.mpg" shrink.m2v shifted.ac3 >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex problem

2006-01-23 Thread Andrew Stevens
Hi Bob, This is both good and bad news. Good news: things are behaving sanely. The bad news: the AC3 sequence is now correctly being read. If the problem was in the sequence and not the reader this should not be possible as all the 'tail' thing does isremove 100 AC3 frames off the front. Sigh.