[Mjpeg-users] Matrox rainbow runner studio

2005-08-29 Thread Stan Gammons
Hi everyone, I'm new to this list, so forgive me if this topic has been beat to death before. I didn't find it by searching the archives. I have an older Matrox rainbow runner studio card. NOT a G series card. It's the Mystique 220 with the rainbow runner studio add on card. The "studio" card u

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Matrox rainbow runner studio

2005-08-29 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 21:10 -0500, Stan Gammons wrote: > I have an older Matrox rainbow runner studio card. NOT a G series card. > It's the Mystique 220 with the rainbow runner studio add on card. The > "studio" card uses a ZR36060 chip along with the SAA7111A video decoder > but it has a SAA7125HZ

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Matrox rainbow runner studio

2005-08-29 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 21:10 -0500, Stan Gammons wrote: > > "studio" card uses a ZR36060 chip along with the SAA7111A video decoder > > but it has a SAA7125HZ digital video encoder. Can the driver zoran and > > mjpeg tools be made to work with this ca

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Matrox rainbow runner studio

2005-08-29 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 20:03 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 21:10 -0500, Stan Gammons wrote: > > > "studio" card uses a ZR36060 chip along with the SAA7111A video decoder > > > but it has a SAA7125HZ digital video encoder. Can

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Matrox rainbow runner studio

2005-08-29 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Could've known. I was waiting for that (thanks for being so prompt :-)). > Still, if you're looking for something pure, cool, > old-fashioned and flashy, so something that'll impress girls [*] as Hmmm, when are you supposed to ha

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Matrox rainbow runner studio

2005-08-29 Thread Martin Samuelsson
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:37:34 -0700 (PDT) "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Still, if you're looking for something pure, cool, > > old-fashioned and flashy, so something that'll impress girls [*] as > > Hmmm, when are you supposed to have time to impress girls if you're >