On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:35:35AM +0200, Matti Haveri wrote:
> >> PAL/NTSC 352x288/240 is a valid DVD resolution but I'm unsure whether
> >> I should encode it as MPEG1 or MPEG2.
> >
> > MPEG1
>
> Things were clear for a few days but now I'm confused again ;)
You've actually discovered a "cardin
Matti Haveri, on 20/03/2005 23:35 you wrote:
>>> PAL/NTSC 352x288/240 is a valid DVD resolution but I'm unsure whether
>>> I should encode it as MPEG1 or MPEG2.
>>
>> MPEG1
>
You can use both, but MPEG-2 it's better since you can use DVD bitrate
(up to 9800Kbits/s for video stream). MPEG-1 is onl
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Matti Haveri wrote:
> Things were clear for a few days but now I'm confused again ;)
Yes, I think you managed to confuse yourself again :-)
> But I then noticed that QuickTime Player couldn't show the image of
> the VOB file or of the MPEG converted from it via MPE
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Matti Haveri wrote:
> I failed to mention that I did try to compile y4mscaler manually from
> the tarball but I'm not so familiar with this stuff. Phrases like
> "You may need/want to edit "Makefile" to change MJPEG_PREFIX or other
> relevant parameters" make me dizzy. Wha
Hi -
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Matti Haveri wrote:
> I ran a series with -b 1875 and different -q values (8, 6, 4, 2, 1,
> and q omitted):
> The moving scenes were OK but dimly lit or quiet scenes were quite
> bad with -q 8. -q 1-2 and no q (=CBR) were the best in this regard. I
> found that -q 4
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Matti Haveri wrote:
> > y4mscaler will do that automagically I believe.
>
> I made a doomed attempt to compile y4mscaler in Mac OS X 10.3.8. (I
Wow - that's amazing, it's not a large/complex program to build.
>have compiled mjpegtools via Fink previously. Fink
