Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Kesterson
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:18:57 +0200, Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 08 August 2003 13:30, Ronald Bultje wrote: Hey all, the list was moved to "member-only" posting just a few seconds ago. And there was much rejoicing! Yay! Now instead of 100 spams a day, I'll only get 99!

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Martin Samuelsson
On Friday 08 August 2003 13:30, Ronald Bultje wrote: > Hey all, > > the list was moved to "member-only" posting just a few seconds ago. And there was much rejoicing! /Sam --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inclu

[Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Brian Edmonds
So what's up with all the pathetic spam that seems to have started coming through on the mjpeg lists more often these days? If you'd like to move the lists somewhere with better spam filtering, if sourceforge can't hack it, I'd be happy to host them for you. I know my leaving the list wouldn't be

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey Brian, On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:41, Brian Edmonds wrote: > So what's up with all the pathetic spam that seems to have started > coming through on the mjpeg lists more often these days? If you'd like > to move the lists somewhere with better spam filtering, if sourceforge > can't hack it, I'd

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Al Bogner
Am Donnerstag, 7. August 2003 19:16 schrieb Ronald Bultje: > I basically agree with you and therefore propose to move it to > restricted mode. Anyone against? No! Also I like it how transcode handles the archive: If you go to http://www.theorie.physik.uni-goettingen.de/pipermail/transcode-user

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On 7 Aug 2003, Ronald Bultje wrote: > You're right, unfortunately. The list is open-to-all for postings. I can > move it to restricted-to-members, which means you have to sign up to the > list before sending messages. In the past, we didn't do this so people > could send their questions even with

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-08 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey all, the list was moved to "member-only" posting just a few seconds ago. If I broke things, please let me know. Also, any form of spam (I'm talking about "speczial offer becuz' u'r my friend" type of e-mails) will obviously be banned from the list. HTH, Ronald -- Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-08 Thread Vladimir Shved
Title: RE: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts) > You're right, unfortunately. The list is open-to-all for > postings. I can > move it to restricted-to-members, which means you have to > sign up to the > list before sending messages. In the past, we didn't

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-08 Thread Martin Samuelsson
> this list want to support advertisers. Although, signing up will arise > privacy issues, what kind of information do you have to provide when > signing up? > > --Vlad E-mail address, and whether or not you prefer to read the list in digest mode. /Sam --