Andrew Stevens wrote:
>
> I would *love* to get a solid 8-16 hours a week in on mpeg2enc/mplex like I
> used to years ago but I now have (in no particular order): a wife, a young
> son (cute!), a day-job doing equally interesting SW engineering, a house, and
> enough money to indulge my motorcy
Hallo
>> The author/maintainer of mpeg2enc has obtained a modicum of
>> development/free time and has checked in, today, changes to
>> mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation
>> and produce non corrupted video.
>>
>> So, do a 'cvs update', rebuild an
Hi Andrei,
> Well, yeah, but code doesn't change all by itself - there are people
> making the decisions, etc. Basically, it looks like mjpegtools has a too
> long development cycle. All the good stuff is always in CVS, and it
> stays there for years.
I guess you're probably still a young fellow
Am Montag, den 05.11.2007, 22:45 -0800 schrieb Florin Andrei:
> Oh wait, there's editing. Hm, I've heard that Cinelerra can do that, and
> perhaps Kdenlive too.
Erm, you won't believe it: blender can do this, too... (And I personally
liked it much more than Cinelerra... it does not crash so oft
Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>> I said this before - you guys should make releases way more often. Very
>
> Of what? Broken software? No sense doing a release for the last
> year or whatever since it was broken. And now it _may_ be fixed
>
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I said this before - you guys should make releases way more often. Very
Of what? Broken software? No sense doing a release for the last
year or whatever since it was broken. And now it _may_ be fixed
and it's time for testin
Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> Good News.
>
> The author/maintainer of mpeg2enc has obtained a modicum of
> development/free time and has checked in, today, changes to
> mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation
> and produce non corrupted video.
>
>
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> $229... inexpensive ... cough cough. I've got MIPS and hard-disk space up the
Sure - compared to the ADVC300 or something like the Aja IO/LA
(http://www.aja.com/html/products_Io_IoLAD.html but can do everything
from 10bit uncom
Andrew Stevens wrote:
>>> Anyone got a recommendation for an inexpensive analog capture card that
>>> works well with mjpegtools?
>> For inexpensive nothing beats a Canopus ADVC-110 (the -300 is good
>> but I've come to the conclusion it's not worth the extra money over
>> the 110)
> > Anyone got a recommendation for an inexpensive analog capture card that
> > works well with mjpegtools?
>
> For inexpensive nothing beats a Canopus ADVC-110 (the -300 is good
> but I've come to the conclusion it's not worth the extra money over
> the 110). Use dvgrab/kino to
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 10:22 -0700 schrieb Steven M. Schultz:
> For inexpensive nothing beats a Canopus ADVC-110 (the -300 is good
ah, I did overlook this one... so my response was obsolete... :-)
cu
Stefan
-
T
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 13:30 +0100 schrieb Andrew Stevens:
> Anyone got a recommendation for an inexpensive analog capture card that works
> well with mjpegtools?
I have an Canopus ADVC-110 here. There is nothing out there which can
beat it. (Not even the -300). But it is *external*. Just
Hallo
> LML33 support seems to have died in recent 2.6 kernels and I appear to have
> lent someone my old Philips SAA7134 reference board which I used to use for
> Software-MJPEG capture (I used to work for Philips).
Hmm, have you tried loading each kernel module manual ?
Might be that the wrong
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> Andrew here (mpeg2enc author).
> IF Steven and I are currently using the same test sample then the high q
We are - and yes it is rotten quality (tape was on the verge of
causing the VCR to mistrack). The original 4:2:2 uncompressed d
Hi all,
Andrew here (mpeg2enc author).
> Well, I thought so too at first.
>
> But look at the "q=" lines! If you're seeing "q=18" or so then
> there are still issues to be resolved.
IF Steven and I are currently using the same test sample then the high q
values (and rotten qu
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, November 01, 2007 at 23:13:04 -0700
>>> mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation
>>> and produce non corrupted video.
>>
>> Great!
>
> Well, I thought so too at first.
>
> But look at the "q=" lines! If you're seeing "q=18" or so then
> ther
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Christian Ebert wrote:
> > mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation
> > and produce non corrupted video.
>
> Great!
Well, I thought so too at first.
But look at the "q=" lines! If you're seeing "q=18" or so then
there ar
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, November 01, 2007 at 12:55:23 -0700
> The author/maintainer of mpeg2enc has obtained a modicum of
> development/free time and has checked in, today, changes to
> mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation
> and produce non corrupted video.
Great
Good News.
The author/maintainer of mpeg2enc has obtained a modicum of
development/free time and has checked in, today, changes to
mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation
and produce non corrupted video.
So, do a 'cvs update',
19 matches
Mail list logo
