On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I said this before - you guys should make releases way more often. Very
Of what? Broken software? No sense doing a release for the last
year or whatever since it was broken. And now it _may_ be fixed
and it's time for testing, not a release.
> few people are going to track the CVS.
Then I guess they're not the folks that should be testing unreleased
and possibly buggy software, right? That's more of a developer
(or development assisting) activity and that's what CVS is for.
A release means that testing has been done . Testing is done out of
cvs and not a release.
> BTW, if I'm using 1.8.0 (default on Ubuntu), what do I get if I upgrade
> to 1.9.0 RC1?
The last known working encoder perhaps. I think it was after RC1
that things broke rather badly. Number of the filters were enhanced
and I think the deinterlacing and denoising software was heavily
revised.
Now if you get the current CVS there's memory leaks fixed, further
revisions / rewrites of the utils/filters. Build support for OSX
10.5 (done just a couple days ago ;)) and lots more - I don't keep
a list in mind (that's what CVS is for ;))
Cheers,
Steven
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
