On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> Ok, I must be blind. Ever since the issue came to light I've been watching
> for news on it but I never saw anything.
I was referring to -q discussion in general. It felt to me that
have been many threads of discussion about
Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > For a long time there have been known issues with encoding at low quality
> > factors such as q=2 (ie: high quality encoding) on ix86. I understand this
>
> Not -q again. Seems like just yesterday there was (yet another)
> discussion about it.
Ok, I must
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> For a long time there have been known issues with encoding at low quality
> factors such as q=2 (ie: high quality encoding) on ix86. I understand this
Not -q again. Seems like just yesterday there was (yet another)
discussion about
Interestingly enough I attempted using mpeg2enc as a change (from
ffmpeg) just to see how things were progressing.
I had just compiled the mjpeg suite on my g5, to do some NTSC to PAL
conversion.
I used the following settings:
mpeg2enc -f 8 -q 2 -M 8
I couldn't get it using more than 2 of m
Hi all
For a long time there have been known issues with encoding at low quality
factors such as q=2 (ie: high quality encoding) on ix86. I understand this
was due to something related to potential overflows in some parts of the MMX
code. From memory the general recommendation from a year or so
