Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-17 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Norayr Chilingaryan wrote: > http://www.geocities.com/nemrout/convert.html > > Please, look there, and tell me what U think... > It seems that second picture deformed and much cropped... It is _supposed_ to be deformed ;) When you play it back on a DVD/CD p

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-17 Thread Norayr Chilingaryan
Hello again... Thank You all very much for such useful ansers... Now, I made some experiments... and published screenshots and shell strings near every screenshot... http://www.geocities.com/nemrout/convert.html Please, look there, and tell me what U think... It seems that second picture deforme

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-13 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo Some additional notes. > > It is usually a good idea to include as much information as possible > > (better to have too much than not enough information ;)). > > > > What framesize did you capture the data at? > I am using Miro DC10plus so I capturing video with 768x576, P

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-13 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Norayr Chilingaryan wrote: > I am using Miro DC10plus so I capturing video with 768x576, PAL, 25 fps. > Excuse me, I wrote all data about my sorce in the first post. > It was unclear if you were making a VCD or a DVD (or both) and was the DC10+ being told to

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-13 Thread Norayr Chilingaryan
> It is usually a good idea to include as much information as possible > (better to have too much than not enough information ;)). > > What framesize did you capture the data at? I am using Miro DC10plus so I capturing video with 768x576, PAL, 25 fps. Excuse me, I wrote all d

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-10 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Matto Marjanovic wrote: > >Thank You very much, but these two days I am trying to solve some problems > >I can't pipe lav2yuv | y4mscaler | mpeg2enc because mpeg2enc every time > >says that he can't manage interlaced video. It is usually a good idea to include as

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-10 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>Thank You very much, but these two days I am trying to solve some problems >I can't pipe lav2yuv | y4mscaler | mpeg2enc because mpeg2enc every time >says that he can't manage interlaced video. I have a suspicion that you haven't done enough reading, but the start of this thread is long gone

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-09 Thread Norayr Chilingaryan
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > You do not need or want to put black bars on. All you need to do > is resample (scale) the data to the correct SAR (Sample Aspect Ratio). > > To do that you want 'y4mscaler': > > http://www.mir.com/DMG/Software/y4mscale

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-07 Thread John Gay
On Tue 07 Sep 2004 18:10, Matto Marjanovic wrote: > > > > ... > > >Maybe this info should be compiled into a text file distributed with the > >sources so people can have one place to read up on all the gory details > >concerning aspect ratios in NTSC, PAL, VCD, SVCD, DVD, HDTV and wide > > sc

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-07 Thread Matto Marjanovic
> ... >Maybe this info should be compiled into a text file distributed with the >sources so people can have one place to read up on all the gory details >concerning aspect ratios in NTSC, PAL, VCD, SVCD, DVD, HDTV and wide screen >formats. See "http://www.mir.com/DMG/"; for a good chunk

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-07 Thread John Gay
On Tue 07 Sep 2004 17:29, Steven M. Schultz wrote: This seems to come up a lot. I know I asked questions in a similar vain and I alway read these posts carefully to try to understand it better. Maybe this info should be compiled into a text file distributed with the sources so people can have

Re: [Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Norayr Chilingaryan wrote: > I have to say, that mpeg2enc is the best mpeg coder I ever seen. There are better ones but they cost $$$ ;) > As You know, dc10plus can capture 768x576 or 384x288 videos, i. e. exactly > 4:3 aspect. That is because the dc10+ is s

[Mjpeg-users] constrains and aspect ratio

2004-09-07 Thread Norayr Chilingaryan
Hello. I have to say, that mpeg2enc is the best mpeg coder I ever seen. Now question ;) Every day I shoot some videos with my vhs-c camera and then tansfer them to pc with dc10plus card. As You know, dc10plus can capture 768x576 or 384x288 videos, i. e. exactly 4:3 aspect. It is fine, and when con