Re: [Mjpeg-users] CVD results

2003-10-19 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Maik Holtkamp wrote: > [CVD/SVCD vs DVD] > > Thanks a lot, but what are your results comparing quality of CVD and > SVCD. Since for important material I use dvd anyway I am basicly > interessted in the results of the "cheap" formats. You can see a slight loss of de

Re: [Mjpeg-users] CVD results

2003-10-19 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Steffen Barszus wrote: > Not to forget, that 352x576/480 is a valid DVD resolution, meaning that > you can have around 6 hours on one DVD if you wish so ;) Who, me, forget? :) I'm usually the person reminding folks that 352xNNN is a valid DVD size.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] CVD results

2003-10-19 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2003 23:32 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > Hi! > > Yesterday I was experimenting with creating a CVD and > wondering what effect the various new options in mpeg2enc would have > when making a CVD. > > The results were amazing. For casual viewing (and depending

Re: [Mjpeg-users] CVD results

2003-10-19 Thread Maik Holtkamp
Hi, 0n 03/10/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:32 Steven M. Schultz told me: > Hi! > > Yesterday I was experimenting with creating a CVD and wondering what > effect the various new options in mpeg2enc would have when making > a CVD. [CVD/SVCD vs DVD] Thanks a lot, but what are your results c

[Mjpeg-users] CVD results

2003-10-18 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi! Yesterday I was experimenting with creating a CVD and wondering what effect the various new options in mpeg2enc would have when making a CVD. The results were amazing. For casual viewing (and depending on the data source) it appears that over 60 minut