On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Maik Holtkamp wrote:
> [CVD/SVCD vs DVD]
>
> Thanks a lot, but what are your results comparing quality of CVD and
> SVCD. Since for important material I use dvd anyway I am basicly
> interessted in the results of the "cheap" formats.
You can see a slight loss of detail and the blockiness is
somewhat more apparent. Since the bitrate ended up being
so low I would be tempted to increase the quality (change
-q 8 to -q 7 or perhaps even -q 6) and trade some play time
for quality.
I found the image to look better on a LCD (portable DVD player
or computer monitor) than on my TV set. Probably due to the
TV set's blacklevel/brightness not being set right - it is an old
set that should be replaced (it overscans quite a bit more than
one would expect).
To me the interesting (but not completely unexpected) part was
that both of the standalone players had no trouble with the CVD
format even though I used 48k audio instead of the (S)VCD
standard 44.1k
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
