Re: [Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-25 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Roberto Salles wrote: > Imported. Not that kind of "local"... wish it were. Canopus site doesn't > even have a decent link for us. It directs us to some store of Argentina. That's "right next door" - almost local ;) Like the US and Canada ;) > Again, more on this

Re: [Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-25 Thread Roberto Salles
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:04:59 -0700 (PDT) "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Ah, so if you have found a _local_ place that will sell the > Canopus device then that means they should work with PAL-M. [...] Imported. Not that kind of "local"... wish it were. Canopus

Re: [Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-24 Thread raray
Hey Roberto I'm a noobie to video processing so I can't be much help there but I do have a ADVC-300. It's been a great device. Noisy VHS tapes that my capture card could only capture a few minutes at a time are no problem with the ADVC-300. It's rock solid and worth every penny. >From the ADVC-300

Re: [Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-23 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Roberto Salles wrote: > It's quite a while I don't write anything on the mjpeg list and I > remember there was a person that would really make good coments > about the Canopus capture devices. After years, now I'm working and I think there are several of us who have

[Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-23 Thread Roberto Salles
Hello! Sorry to be sending this e-mail to you but I think you can answer some questions to me. It's quite a while I don't write anything on the mjpeg list and I remember there was a person that would really make good coments about the Canopus capture devices. After years, now I'm working and I