I wish I could help you...maybe one of the developers that knows our build
system better could help?
I'm running Fedora Core 9 and have the following SDL-related packages installed:
SDL-1.2.13-3.fc9.i386
SDL_gfx-devel-2.0.16-5.fc9.i386
SDL_gfx-2.0.16-5.fc9.i386
SDL_image-1.2.6-6.fc9.i386
SDL-dev
* Steven Boswell II on Thursday, June 04, 2009 at 12:26:15 -0700
> Whoops! That was an integration error. I just checked in the
> fix. Sorry about that!
No prob. Builds fine now. Thanks.
c
--
\black\trash movie_C O W B O Y_ _C A N O E_ _C O M A_
Ein deutscher Western/A German Western
--
Le 4 juin 09 à 21:26, Steven Boswell II a écrit :
> Whoops! That was an integration error. I just checked in the fix.
> Sorry about that!
>
> For those of you that aren't subscribed to the mjpeg-developer list,
> I've been doing heavy development of y4mdenoise lately, I've finally
> foun
Whoops! That was an integration error. I just checked in the fix. Sorry
about that!
For those of you that aren't subscribed to the mjpeg-developer list, I've been
doing heavy development of y4mdenoise lately, I've finally found a practical
implementation of my original idea, and it's faster
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:04 +1000, Richard Archer wrote:
> At 3:41 PM +0200 3/6/09, Hervé wrote:
>
> >hello, I'm not developper but it could not be a buffer concern? (it's
> >just an idea)
>
> Following this hint, I doubled the buffer sizes allocated
> by y4mstabilizer and it now works! I have no
Hallo
>> I tried to run mplex in gdb mode and do backtrace, but this was my first
>> time using 'gdb' - Is this enough?
>>
>> gdb --args mplex -f 8 -S 0 -M -o test.mpeg2 test.m2v test_EN.m2a
>> GNU gdb 6.8-debian
>> Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
[...]
>> Program received signa
Hi,
With latest CVS mjpegtools do not build anymore here:
[...]
Making all in y4mdenoise
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I../utils -DNDEBUG
-finline-functions -mdynamic-no-pic -march=nocona -mtune=nocona -g -O2
-I/sw/include -no-cpp-precomp -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wall -Wunus
On 04/06/2009, at 4:04 PM, Richard Archer wrote:
>
> As it turns out, this tool doesn't do what I wanted it
> to anyway.
Does what you want it to do be a suitable extension to the tool.
I was about to pick up the code and debug it, however if you've found
that increasing the buffer size fixes
