On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Yes, those are cute enough. Is it possible to buy just the motherboard,
> cutting away the cost for a case that I'm not going to use?
It probably is possible to buy just the board but I have not
looked into that. The cooling and m
On Sunday 03 August 2003 17:52, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> > Bummer. It would've made a really nice system otherwise.
>
> If you're looking for a small form factor system that's quiet
> and fast look at the Shuttle product line (there are a
Hey Martin,
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 17:45, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Another factor is that I'm not using the picky Buz in that machine, but
> another card. You-know-which. :) Ahwell, I'll see if I can find more info.
Yeah, the one that is three positions down on my TODO list for the
driver. ;).
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Bummer. It would've made a really nice system otherwise.
>
If you're looking for a small form factor system that's quiet
and fast look at the Shuttle product line (there are a couple
other companies making miniature systems)
> No, http://mjpeg.sourceforge.net/driver-zoran/documentation.php, point
> 3. I just read through it, it's about the MVP3 (?). I guess we have no
> experience with the EPIA yet. Sorry for the confusion. It doesn't really
> seem like the best on-developped mainboard, but who knows...
>
> Anyone trie
Hey,
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 17:18, Raena Lea-Shannon wrote:
> I tried your advice compiling without quicktime4 linix but I I get this error.
It's still using qt4l from the cache. Use 'make distclean', and then
re-./configure.
Ronald
--
Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
> > Do you mean http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/buz/documentation/FAQ.html ?
>
> No, http://mjpeg.sourceforge.net/driver-zoran/documentation.php, point
Ah, there. Goody. :)
> 3. I just read through it, it's about the MVP3 (?). I guess we have no
> experience with the EPIA yet. Sorry for the confusi
On Sunday 03 August 2003 23:48, you wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 14:30, Raena Lea-Shannon wrote:
> > lav_io.c: In function `check_DV2_input':
> > lav_io.c:1385: error: too many arguments to function `dv_decoder_new'
> > lav_io.c:1415: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > `dv_dec
Hallo
> > On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 13:59, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> > > Has anyone on the list experimented with the EPIA-M series, and can tell
> > > if it's justified to slap a VIA WARNING label on it and forget the whole
> > > thing?
> >
> > I think Andrew's comment (see driver FAQ) was "forget i
Hey Martin,
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 16:48, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Bummer. It would've made a really nice system otherwise.
>
> Do you mean http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/buz/documentation/FAQ.html ?
No, http://mjpeg.sourceforge.net/driver-zoran/documentation.php, point
3. I just read through it
On Sunday 03 August 2003 15:47, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Hey Martin,
>
> On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 13:59, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> > Has anyone on the list experimented with the EPIA-M series, and can tell
> > if it's justified to slap a VIA WARNING label on it and forget the whole
> > thing?
>
> I thi
Hey,
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 14:30, Raena Lea-Shannon wrote:
> lav_io.c: In function `check_DV2_input':
> lav_io.c:1385: error: too many arguments to function `dv_decoder_new'
> lav_io.c:1415: warning: implicit declaration of function `dv_decoder_free'
Don't use quicktime4linux. :).
Ronald
--
Ro
Hey Martin,
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 13:59, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Has anyone on the list experimented with the EPIA-M series, and can tell if
> it's justified to slap a VIA WARNING label on it and forget the whole thing?
I think Andrew's comment (see driver FAQ) was "forget it". :).
Ronald
-
I believe I am very close.
1. jgep-mmx now compiles thanks to work arounsd of configure to gcc -02
2. nasm now is properly compiles from tar ball from
http://antennspecialisten.se/~sm5bsz/linuxdsp/install/nasminst.htm
3. now mmx is enabled on compile
BUT
on make
On Saturday 02 August 2003 23:01, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sad, 2003-08-02 at 17:34, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > You can't go wrong with an AMD chipset. I've never thought much
> > of the VIA chips (problems abound with those it seems - the archives
> > of this group should have quite a
15 matches
Mail list logo
