I don't know this is the right place to ask this,
but let me explain a problem i have today.
I encountered the following compile errors when trying to gmake
httperf, an http benchmark tool.
/usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:54: error: duplicate member `th_off'
/usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:55: error: dup
A silly question.
I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
System?
As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System.
Is there any reason not to re
2006/4/28, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
> daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
> System?
> As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
> Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating
2006/4/29, Aaron Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
compare OpenBSD's goals with the FreeBSD project's goals and you
should be able to understand why Theo said what he said.
aaron.glenn
p.s. the offer still stands for a trade, so far no takers )-:
I read both project's goals, however it is not enoug
2006/4/29, Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
js wrote:
> I don't want to start holy war, but just out of curiosity.
OpenBSD is, like FreeBSD, much advanced over BSD4.4, so the BSD4.4 book
is not completely useful for hacking on OpenBSD or FreeBSD.
But the FreeBSD book describe
Hi!
I just saw
https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/6.8/common/002_icmp6.patch.sig,
however, it's unclear from the description and the context around the patch if
this is a read after free or write after free (or both).
In the case of a write after free, would this change "Only two remo
> Am 30.10.2020 um 01:28 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>
> js-openbsd-m...@webkeks.org wrote:
>
>> I just saw
>> https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/6.8/common/002_icmp6.patch.sig,
>> however, it's unclear from the description and the context around the
>&
To close this thread, I found this:
https://twitter.com/m00nbsd/status/1321524807473782784
> Am 30.10.2020 um 11:15 schrieb js-openbsd-m...@webkeks.org:
>
>> Am 30.10.2020 um 01:28 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>>
>> js-openbsd-m...@webkeks.org wrote:
>>
>>>
> Honestly, as one of the devs involved with this security fix, I can tell
> you that I don't know. It is a use-after-free in some situations.
> Is it reachable from remote? I don't know.
> Is it reachable from local? Maybe.
> Is the use-after-free exploitable? Damn hard to tell, it is for sure n
On 3.6, I have successfully used dhcpd over vlan interfaces, with the
gateway between vlans being the machine running dhcpd.
On 3.7, I am now wanting to replace the gateway between vlans by a
pair of machines running carp over each vlan, but I still want to use
dhcpd to allocate addresses to mach
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:00:11AM -0700, Jon Simola wrote:
My thinking (and I read through the dhcpd/carp code to try and verify
this) is that the carp interface doesn't receive all broadcast packets
(except arp), so the dhcp would have to be listening on the vlan
device. I did some tcpdump'ing
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:56:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice the "Unknown device: hl1250" error, which is actually the name of the
driver (hl1430 uses hl1250), but I can't make any sense of the above.
How do I go from here?
The OpenBSD version of ghostscript doesn't include the
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:00:18AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder why the OpenBSD Ghostscript port wasn't build upon the CUPS ESP
version which include almost twice as many drivers. As far as I understand the
ESP is just an extended version with more drivers.
There are already two gho
13 matches
Mail list logo
