I think the follow about this:
The OpenBSD project must and need to keep simple .
The more important is not lost the focus of the security
And OpenBSD by yourself already make this.
Comixwall is only one frontend wrote in php to control some services such as
Dansguardian .
But no lost the focus o
Since when announcing is spam ?
Being that the Comixwall is OpenBSD
Why Theo don't announcing or put a link in the OpenBSD website to Comixwall
website ?
Why no think in the collective one ?
2009/12/12 J Sisson
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:54 PM, wrote:
>
> > This isn't about money, is about s
Yes ..
You have all the reason .
I ask .
THEO,
Which the reason for not announce the Comixwall in the OpenBSD misc list ?
I would like to understand.
My best regards
2009/12/12 FRLinux
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM, dark knight neo
> wrote:
> > Since when announ
I any old computers on the openbsd 4.6 stable, I disabled the acpi on bios
2009/12/15 Tomas Bodzar
> ugh what's that?
>
> OpenBSD 4.6-current (DIRAC.MP) #13: Sun Mar 6 14:18:33 CET 2005
> r...@dirac.in.chemnet:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/DIRAC.MP
>
> you have custom kernel? Then show this
sorry ...
not any
but many
2009/12/15 Jacob Meuser
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:53:03AM -0200, dark knight neo wrote:
>
> I miss the nose that knows. and the farmer running openbsd. dope ice
> appolyon III, clever, and grumpy is classic, of course.
>
> but good gri
Sorry,
I do not program,
but some x86 pc's when I reboot or halt
I had a very similiar error when syncing disk
I disabled ACPI on bios
and the problem stoped
2009/12/15 dark knight neo
>
> sorry ...
> not any
> but many
>
>
> 2009/12/15 Jacob Meuser
>
> >
Hello everyone,
I'm trying compiling the patch of bind .. and the following error occur:
# patch -p0 < 007_bind.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- usr.sbin/bind/bin/named/update.c (revision 1875)
|+++ usr.sbin/bind/bi
Dear all,
What you think about new routing of the freebsd 8 ?
I'm paranoid in openbsd particularly, because puffy is simple and efficient.
This new routing really backwards some improvement that deserve attention ?
Thanks in advanced
Hello there,
I have the following situation:
2 computers
comp 1 -> wan = 200.xx.xx.xx.2 lan = 192.168.0.2
comp 2 -> wan = 192.168.2.1 lan 192.168.168.0.1 / webserver running on port
443
i can connect to webserver via comp1 in this form
rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from xxx to port 443 -> 192
Hello there,
I have the following situation:
2 computers
comp 1 -> wan = 200.xx.xx.xx.2 gw 200.xx.xx.xx.1 lan = 192.168.0.2 ( NAT BOX
)
comp 2 -> wan = 192.168.2.1 gw 192.168.2.2 lan 192.168.168.0.1 / webserver
running on port 443 ( NAT BOX)
i can connect to webserver via comp1 in this form
r
Hello misc ,
On OpenBSD 4.4 and 4.5 Installation with SATA CD/DVD after the copy of
packages the system it does not continue.
I Changed to a IDE CDROM/DVDROM and Success in Instalation
I tested it in 3 different computers with different hardware
11 matches
Mail list logo
