Greetings,
Saturday evening, one of our firewalls crashed (thankfully carp worked
well :) with the following error in the messages file:
Oct 15 23:56:41 new-fw /bsd: uvm_fault(0xd676852c, 0x74000, 0, 1) -> e
Oct 16 01:14:53 new-fw syslogd: restart
Oct 16 01:14:53 new-fw /bsd: OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERI
> > It dropped to DDB (because I forgot to disable it :( and I did The
> > following:
>
> First thing you should probably do is actually read what is
> on the screen and actually send the output of ps, trace and a
> dmesg(8). Else, you're not going to get much reliable support.
>
> RTFM -- it'
Happy Birthday to OpenBSD, and kudos to the devs for a brilliant
product :) We love it :)
-D.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Ken Gunderson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:17 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD's 10
Shrug.. Ok .. I'll keep my bug reports to myself from here on in, since
it seems someone asking for some help, which may not realize the information
provided was not entirely what was required is to receive a fairly rude reply,
which, rather then saying - hey, please send this.. It would be helpful
Peter Hessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:35 AM
> To: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD Kernel Crash in uvm_fault or
> uvm_rb_remove (not quite sure which it originates from)
>
>
> You refused to foll
> You're kidding, right?
Nope.. Apparently I suffer from lack of sleep, and GDB syndrome,
I looked right at the crash line, and didn't even pay attention
to what was above it. My apologies for that - didn't even notice
it.
> You were asked to send a ps and a trace. You sent "what you
> thought
been here 10
years, and may not read the archives to realize the question they ask has
been asked 100 times (Just last week :)
That is my simple 2 cents - love me, hate me, whatever.
-D.
> -Original Message-
> From: Spruell, Darren-Perot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue
>
Diddo.
>
> >- That also being said, as Darren pointed out below, we have
> a group of
> >people on this list, in particular the devs (but others too
> I am sure)
> >that have some serious UNIX skills. I personally, came from
> the Linux &
> >Cisco world primarily, but Unix has its stren
> Now I you are a troll.
>
Not usually.. I'm just being one today, because some
folks ruffled my feathers. Seriously though.. This
Email we are corresponding about was written as
Some suggestions, which I honestly see as helpful.
Some (or all perhaps) won't agree, but this is
What discussion is
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:14:09PM -0600, Wolfpaw - Dale Corse wrote:
> > Can you please enlighten me as to how this is a web based
> system? It
> > looks to me like a page that says.. Use the UNIX command.
> This is not
> > what I was suggesting.
>
> h
Heya :)
>
> well, I don't know about BSD in general, but just try it with
> OpenBSD. If the machine is generally capable of this task
> (has the mem and power to suppert n sessions in parallel),
> it's just your task as admin to make it happen. The means are
> there. If your users bring down
> * Wolfpaw - Dale Corse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-19 05:13]:
> > you, BSD does not stand up to it .. Now I admit - it was years ago,
> > and it was FreeBSD that we tried
>
> yeah yeah, and we all know that OpenBSD is just ErsatzFreiBSD with
> another name on it
> > You may well be right, though I would say that the amount of Code
> > changes users would be required to do, to make it work
> Would end up in
> > my lap, seeing as there are some things OpenBSD's Kernel does not
> > have, or has fairly out of date versions of
> >
> > One example I can thi
> > I wasn't whining - again - how the hell is justifying what I said
> > whining?
>
> You are saying our libpcap is buggy, but you fail to justify
> that claim.
No I didn't, I said it was out of date. You want me to justify it?
Here.
Making all in .
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -DIPV4
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:58 AM
> To: 'Henning Brauer'
> Subject: RE: Guruness (was the bug report thread)
>
>
> > >
> > > Correct me if I am wrong
Wednesday, October 19, 2005 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse
>
>
> People -- just ignore him.
> He may use OpenBSD, but if he can't stop himself from being a
> beligerant fool, not submitting the right reports, why bother
> wasting
> If you can port it, you can also use it on your own box, so
> where is the problem?
No problem there.. Actually looking at the couple of functions I need
here to see how difficult to integrate they would be.
> login.conf (5)
>
> > Problem comes into play when a user starts say .. 50
> > Copie
> Turning this into a learning experience: Does anyone have
> any hints or advice about hardening OpenBSD for shell
> accounts. Do people tweak things other than the login.conf
> settings? I have to deal with student shell accounts where
> students are learning to program and often create pr
> On 10/19/05, Wolfpaw - Dale Corse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > quickly. I try not to use limits, because it slows
> compiling to crap
> > :(
>
> this makes no sense whatsoever.
To clarify, if you limit someone's ram use to a certain point, or
CPU use to
> Yes, that would be the idea of limiting resources. If I am
> given the ability to use 99% of the CPU compiling software,
> how is that different than me running a fork bomb and doing the same?
In essanse I suppose it isn't - but if your (as in my case) selling shells,
compiling is legitimate,
> Edy Purnomo wrote:
> > i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to
> openbsd. he uses
> > mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy after 2
> weeks later he
> > switched it back linux and said : linux much faster to respond the
> > http requests (he had a same configuration on
That's some sad shit Theo. She apologized.. Sheesh.
Flame me for it .. But someone had to say it. Come on
Guys.
What's your specific issue, Sophie? Maybe someone else
can help?
D.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Sophie L
> Sent: T
22 matches
Mail list logo
