> * Wolfpaw - Dale Corse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-19 05:13]: > > you, BSD does not stand up to it .. Now I admit - it was years ago, > > and it was FreeBSD that we tried > > yeah yeah, and we all know that OpenBSD is just ErsatzFreiBSD with > another name on it, right? > sheesh.
Correct me if I am wrong, but its still a monolithic kernel, based on the same thing as the other BSD's .. Hence the BSD in the name, is it not? And since it is specifically the kernel that presents the problem, I felt the comment was somewhat relevant. Please don't turn it into a 'Holy War' comment.. It wasn't. See my other (recent) post for a specific reason justifying it. > > > http://openbsd.rt.fm/query-pr.html > > Nice :) See.. This is what I'm talking about - perhaps it Should be > > linked off the main site too? (Or is it, and I Can't read?) > > Where is the submission system? > > my name shall be melinda if report.html, which you apparently STILL > didn't read (I miss words for that level of ignorance. > really.) doesn't > mention sendbug. Yes, it does. Can you please explain, seeing my apparent level of ignorance, how it is that someone not seeing something at 1AM, or perhaps not reading and archiving in ones mind, by means of memorization, OpenBSD's entire set of documentation .. Makes a person Ignorant? Ignorant of certain things perhaps, but you would think by half the folks here, that failing to remember any single line of docs makes someone equal with the IQ level of a dead rat. It's fairly silly really. The topic being discussed there, was a web based GUI. Well I have had some interesting feedback privately on this email - some of which argues (likely correctly, I would have to now agree) that sendbug is a better option due to not getting second party information. So no, I don't find the comment ignorant, considering sendbug is a unix command line utility, and a web gui was the subject of the discussion. You guys need to work on your hostility level - the email in question was simply a subject for discussion. You get too worked up about the little things ;) I admitted I was wrong about the bug report - I didn't read the screen, is that not enough for you? By the way.. Are you aware that OpenOSPFd under about 5-7MB's of load consumes the majority of the CPU and drops a whole lot of bug logs? I'm scared to submit a bug report here, but if you want me to send you the info, I can try to dig it up :) -D.
