In article <39c822f4-07f1-3544-0a8e-b75446f94...@4ss.de> you wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I thought I could copy the same static server definition block and only
> change a unique macro definition at the top of each server. But this is
> not working:
>
> ##
> # from httpd.conf
> #
Hello everyone,
With mailx(1) in mind and resurrecting the few I know about C I wrote
the code pasted below. It encodes mail headers in MIME quoted-printable
format. Unless I'm missing something it complies with all stated here:
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2047.txt
You can pipe to it a line or
I was pointed out words (no spaces) longer than 256 characters produce a
buffer overflow with my previous version.
I scanned my saved (since ~ 2005) mbox for header lines without spaces
longer than 256 and found several. Most of them are non wrapped base64
encoded text, a few are "References:" s
An overlook I can't figure out why didn't core dumped.
--- encode-qprint-header.c Wed May 24 22:04:24 2017
+++ encode-qprint-header.c Wed May 24 22:03:49 2017
@@ -66,13 +66,12 @@ main()
} else {
if (c > ASCII)
eightb
Inspired in the new utf8 man page (thanks tedu@) I think I found a
solution to the charset issue.
New version:
/*
* MIME encode mail header quoted-printable.
*
*/
#include
#define ASCII 0x7f
#define IN 1
#define OUT 0
#define MAX 1024
int
main()
{
int c, i, n, nl,
Hello Bryan and Radoslav,
In article <20170802015654.ga64...@c.brycv.com> you wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 08:19:23PM -0400, Radoslav_Mirza wrote:
> > Dear Group, Are there any places to start helping out for a beginner?
> > Any junior jobs or todo lists?
> >
> > I have a new Ryzen 1700 runni
Hello everyone,
I was using smtpd(8) (static IP and FQDN resolving direct and reverse)
for a year without problems. Today sending from my server (from the
same address I'm using now) to gmail and hotmail they answered the
following (MAILER-DAEMON answer).
Sending to gmail addresses:
*@gmail.c
Hi Martijn,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:09:10PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Not an authority on this, so take my reply for what you want.
>
> As far as I know this list is used to keep track of ip-addresses by ISPs
> for home-addresses, which are not intended to be used for outgoing mail.
>
Hi Gareth,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> I'm assuming that you have your SPF records setup correctly.
>
I did that at first, and all the tricks (dkim, etc) they ask to make you
appear as a legal sender, but after confirming my mail still went to
SPAM in both (g
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Like Martijn pointed out, you're sending mail from a IP which is not
> intended for mail-servers.
This was my main question. What is an "IP intended for mail-servers"?
Hi Niels,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:19:04PM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>
> > On 6. Aug 2017, at 18:40, Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> >> Like Martijn pointed out, you
In article you wrote:
> On 2017-08-06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list
> > called PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just
> > includes dynamic and "non mail server IP ranges&q
In article <20170808121343.46a8ddb9@fir.internal> you wrote:
> Hi Walter:
>
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:45:22 +0200 Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > What determines those "ranges", who regulates that?
>
> Some ISPs submit IP blocks to various blacklists
Guys,
The issue was solved after the fist answer (Martijn van Duren's).
Everyone's opinions have been very useful. But since this is not
OpenBSD related I propose to let it die.
Hello Rupert,
In article
you wrote:
> https://www.dnsinspect.com/roquesor.com/10171765
Try the link again.
The reason it showed false results was because dnsinspect.com IP was
blocked in my pf firewall. I have a script to detect hacking attempts
in my port 25 and block those IPs automaticall
Hi Stuart,
In article you wrote:
> On 2017-08-10, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
> > An email server in a residential setting will fail PTR unless you are
> > working with a medium sized/an ISP that cares about their customers.
> >
> > see answer here
> > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/371329/bind
In article you wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> In article you wrote:
> > On 2017-08-10, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
> > > An email server in a residential setting will fail PTR unless you are
> > > working with a medium sized/an ISP that cares about their customers.
> > >
> > > see answer here
> > > https://uni
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:26:16PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Rephrasing: if you make an outgoing SMTP connection, a reverse DNS PTR
> record should exist for the source address you're connecting from (whether
> that's v4 or v6), and an A (for v4) or (for v6) lookup for the name
> in tha
Yesterday while copying a big file from one machine to another in my LAN
I noticed that restarting pf:
# pfctl -d && pfctl -e -f /etc/pf.conf
scp stops and quits showing this message:
- stalled - Conection reset by 192.168.1.* Lost connection
Is this expected or is a bug?
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 11:08:23AM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Yesterday while copying a big file from one machine to another in my LAN
> I noticed that restarting pf:
>
> # pfctl -d && pfctl -e -f /etc/pf.conf
I assume it's not necessary to say I'
Hi Stuart,
In article you wrote:
> On 2017-08-12, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Yesterday while copying a big file from one machine to another in my LAN
> > I noticed that restarting pf:
> >
> > # pfctl -d && pfctl -e -f /etc/pf.conf
> >
>
In article <5127ac707aa6f...@server.roquesor.com> you wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> In article you wrote:
> > On 2017-08-12, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Yesterday while copying a big file from one machine to another in my LAN
> > > I noticed that
In article <20170812123632.p7zgt2l4kz43y...@symphytum.spacehopper.org> you
wrote:
> On 2017/08/12 14:33, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > In article <5127ac707aa6f...@server.roquesor.com> you wrote:
> > > Hi Stuart,
> > >
> > > In article yo
Hello everyone,
I'd appreciate experienced opensmtpd users tell me if I'm understanding
well the mechanism in the following rule.
Currently, in my smtpd.conf I have this line:
accept from any for domain virtual deliver to mbox
But since all keys in my "valiases" table are full email address
Hi Gilles,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:15:32AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:22:41AM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'd appreciate experienced opensmtpd users tell me if I'm understanding
> > wel
>
> accept from any for any virtual [...]
>
Besides, after modifying that rule in the file I also had to change the
order. Since rules below the "catch-all" one never get evaluated, it
has forcibly to be the last one:
[...]
accept from local for local alias deliver to mbox
accept
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:10:00PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 01:29:16PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > >
> > > accept from any for any virtual [...]
> > >
> >
> > Besides, after modifying that rule in t
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:31:05PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 02:40:41PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
>
> > In article <20170812123632.p7zgt2l4kz43y...@symphytum.spacehopper.org> you
> > wrote:
> > > On 2017/08/12 14:33
In article <20171026083919.ga38...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary
wrote:
> I am not sure whether man -Tpdf and man -Tps honour the paper size.
I think it does.
I don't have a printer at hand to verify it but if in the gv(1) menu
I select alternativelly A4 (or Letter) and Default I can see how the
page
In article <20171026122507.ga13...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary
wrote:
> On Oct 26 11:36:45, w...@roquesor.com wrote:
> > In article <20171026083919.ga38...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary
> > wrote:
> > > I am not sure whether man -Tpdf and man -Tps honour the paper size.
> >
> > I think it does.
> >
> >
In article <20171026104155982590.bfb59...@talsever.com> Amelia A Lewis
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:14:36 +0200 (CEST), Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> wrote:
> > In the ps file generated by mandoc you should have this line:
> >
> > %%DocumentMedia: Default 595
Answering myself.
In article Walter Alejandro Iglesias
wrote:
> As a side note. You made me realize of something I didn't notice when
> I migrated to openbsd; I have files generated with GNU roff that
> defaults to letter size. This doesn't happen on Linux, I ignore why.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 07:24:43PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote on Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 05:44:16PM +0200:
>
> > I have files generated with GNU roff that defaults to letter size.
>
> That's the upstream (GNU troff)
Hi Ruben,
In article
Ruben Miller wrote:
> In article
> Ruben Miller wrote:
> >The speed is not a problem, since the bug is triggered because cwm raise
> > two windows in every cycle.
> > Just start the cycle with seamonkey selected, so it's always the previous
> > window.
>
> Just in case,
In article Walter Alejandro Iglesias
wrote:
> Hi Ruben,
>
> In article
> Ruben
> Miller wrote:
> > In article
> >
> > Ruben Miller wrote:
> > >The speed is not a problem, since the bug is triggered because cwm raise
> > > two wind
In article <20171026193138.ga41...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary
wrote:
> > > > In the ps file generated by mandoc you should have this line:
> > > >
> > > > %%DocumentMedia: Default 595 841 0 () ()
> > > >
> > > > Where 595 841 correspond to A4. If you set output paper to "letter"
> > > > that li
In article <20171027104221.gd9...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary wrote:
> On Oct 27 12:12:21, w...@roquesor.com wrote:
> > In article <20171026193138.ga41...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary
> > wrote:
> > > > > > In the ps file generated by mandoc you should have this line:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > %%Documen
In article <20180518004729.gl68...@athene.usta.de> Ingo Schwarze
wrote:
> Hi Aner,
>
> Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400:
> > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
> >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>
> >>> Absolutely not.
> >>> Mandoc output is not optimized for any devi
Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
users need a explicit rule. Do I need to add some "match auth" rule?
# /etc/mail/smptd.conf
egress_int="em0"
server="server.roquesor.com"
table aliases file:/etc/mail/
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > >
> > >
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:15:18AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Gilles, I also saw the "ca" directive. I've been using the acme
> > certificates in pki directives, can I use them in the "ca" directive
> > too? (any advantage in doing this?)
> >
>
> don't touch a knob if you don't KNOW that y
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 12:35:57PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:15:18AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > Gilles, I also saw the "ca" directive. I've been using the acme
> > > certificates in pki directives, can I use
Just in case it could be useful to others.
After upgrading the snaptshot requiring the new version of smtpd.conf
it happend that the new rules I'd written (included the last one Gilles
passed me) were all wrong.
I could get it working thanks to the man page. The result:
# OLD
accept from local
Hello,
I had a kernel panic while reproducing a video with mpv.
It's my first kernel panic with OpenBSD, so I didn't know how to use
ddb(4). Since I'm running my http and smtp server in this machine I
cannot entertain myself too much reproducing the panic to get more info.
That's why I don't inc
Hi Visa,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 05:54:15PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > panic: mtx 0x81c86470: locking against myself
> > Stopped at db_enter+0x12: popq%r11
> > TIDP
Hi Todd,
Not an expert here and just to be sure, :-)
In article <21bf906b4c6c6...@sudo.ws> Todd C. Miller
wrote:
> I don't think there is much interest in having a pop3 daemon in
> base due to the use of plain-text passwords
I've been assuming that running pop3d(8) from ports, listening in 995
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 05:38:42AM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:26:27 +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
>
> > I've been assuming that running pop3d(8) from ports, listening in 995
> > only and with 110 port firewalled my passwords aren't
In article <20200415193758.csp3wtf4hnhdc...@gmx.com> Dumitru Moldovan
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:43:26AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> >This second one is still pending (no response from the maintainer so
> >far):
> >
> > https://marc.info/
I understand that this command:
# pfctl -t spam -T expire
Takes in care the "Cleared" date:
# pfctl -t spam -vT show
___.___.22.65
Cleared: Mon May 25 16:10:22 2020
___.___.167.62
Cleared: Mon May 25 16:10:22 2020
[...]
Is there a way to save and res
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:25:21PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:14 PM Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> wrote:
> >
> > I understand that this command:
> >
> > # pfctl -t spam -T expire
> >
> > Takes in care the "Cl
Another question about pf.
Perhaps I don't fully understand how connection rate is calculated.
The following line in /etc/pf.conf:
pass in log inet proto tcp to any port { smtp smtps } synproxy state \
(max-src-conn-rate 5/30, overload flush global)
Shouldn't avoid this happen?
In /
Hello Brian,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Brian Brombacher wrote:
> What do you do with table in other rules? If you’re doing nothing,
> you need to do something like block additional connections, or adjust the
> pass rule to include from !
You're right. I forgot to mention I h
Brian Brombacher wrote:
> Keep in mind operations using pfctl such as reloading rule set or table
> from file, any IP’s caught in the smtp table by the max-src-conn-rate
> will be flushed de pending on your command line.
> Every hour I scrape logs for AUTH failures and add them to a pfctl
> table
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote:
> On 2020-05-27 14:27, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Another question about pf.
> >
> > Perhaps I don't fully understand how connection rate is calculated.
> >
> > The following line in /et
In article <20200528165448.ga22...@flueckiger.lan> Bruno Flueckiger
wrote:
> On 26.05., Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > I understand that this command:
> >
> > # pfctl -t spam -T expire
> >
> > Takes in care the "Cleared" date:
> >
Hello Peter,
In article Peter Nicolai
Mathias Hansteen wrote:
> > 28. mai 2020 kl. 19:09 skrev Bruno Flueckiger :
> >
> >
> > You can save the list of IPs in a table and reload it after a reboot as
> > described here: https://www.bsdhowto.ch/savepftables.html
>
>
> I have a similar setup at
In article Peter Nicolai
Mathias Hansteen wrote:
> It is a possibly desirable feature, but I an not aware whether any of the
> currently capable developers are considering putting in the work to implement
> it.
>
Let me finish the idea, not with the intention to pressure developers
asking fo
Today I burned the latest snapshot in a USB pen-drive and booted it
in a HP desktop of mine where happened this:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=156682947025229&w=2
It seems to be fixed, the card is now recognized out of the box as
1000baseTX as expected. :-) (I didn't change anything in my
Hello everyone,
Lately I noticed that using bc(1) interactively I have to hit Enter
twice to get the result of an operation printed on screen. Plus, a new
empty line is printed below the result. Example:
$ bc
2 + 1 (after hitting Enter twice the two lines below get printed)
3
2 + 2 (
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:09:40PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote on Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 09:57:11PM +0200:
>
> > Lately I noticed that using bc(1) interactively I have to hit Enter
> > twice to get the result of
Hello,
Since years I've been using a shell script of mine to shutdown my laptop
when battery is critical. Convenient because I made it portable among
unix-like systems. In the case of OpenBSD the script asks battery and
AC status to apm(4).
Now I gave a try to the apmd(8) -Z option but, so far,
Hi Edgar,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 11:43:19AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 05:33:41PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since years I've been using a shell script of mine to shutdown my laptop
> > when battery is
Jan Stary wrote:
> Eventualy it does suspend, but much later than
> when the battery life goes below the specified value.
Doing more testing I noticed the same. For example, with these options:
# apmd -d -t 60 -z
It took *5* minutes to suspend the machine. In my first tests I passed
bigger v
Hello everyone,
Weeks ago I purchased a UPS unit for my home server. It's attached to
the machine via a usb port:
uhidev0 at uhub3 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "EATON Eaton 3S" rev
2.00/1.00 addr 2
uhidev0: iclass 3/0, 32 report ids
upd0 at uhidev0
At first I used NUT from package
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:06:17PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On the Internet some NUT users mention issues with libusb. There is an
> old tutorial about using NUT in OpenBSD that advices to install
> libusb-compat but, given the current nut package doesn't i
Hi Boudewijn,
In article Boudewijn Dijkstra
wrote:
> Op Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:06:17 +0200 schreef Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> :
> > [...]
> >
> > It has been working for days (with and without NUT) apparently without
> > problems except for three times in which t
In article <20191028083820.ga43...@nausicaa.home> Marc Espie
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +, flauenroth wrote:
> > Apparently not just theo is using fvwm after all. :)
>
> Considering all the people using it, it would be great if someone were to
> look at the enhancements of
In article Mike Williams
wrote:
> Hiya
>
> On 10/27/17 14:31, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > [ sending this particular one back to the list
> > because it contains something useful for everyone and nothing private ]
>
> Replying to list to archive comments even if not acted on.
>
> > Hi Jan,
> >
A question to the experts here.
My home router (a crappy one provided by my ISP) has ipv6 disabled, at
least it's what its guied configuration tells me. :-) And I have ipv6
disabled in all my LAN machines. The laptop I use with OpenBSD has
slaacd(8) up and running by default, even when I didn't
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 05:58:59AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >A question to the experts here.
> >
> >My home router (a crappy one provided by my ISP) has ipv6 disabled, at
> >least it's what its guied configuration tells me. :-) And I have ipv6
> >disabled in all my LAN machines. The laptop I
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 04:57:14PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 05:58:59AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> >A question to the experts here.
> >> >
> >> >My home router (a crappy one provided by my ISP) has ipv6 disabled, at
> >> >least it's what its guied configuration te
Hello,
I'd never used pax(1), reading the man page I found this command can be
used to make a backup:
$ pax -r -w -v -Y -Z home /backup
Faster than using rsync indeed, but it seems that the -Y and -Z options
don't work with ext2fs?
--
Walter
I expect from that command no more and no less than what is explained in
the man page:
Update (and list) only those files in the destination directory
/backup which are older (less recent inode change or file
modification times) than files with the same name found in the source
fil
On Thu, 2 May 2024 12:03:10, Stuart Henderson wrote
> I don't have a suitable filesystem handy to test, but does OpenBSD's
> implementation of ext2fs support sub-second timestamps?
>
> stat -f %Fm $filename
>
> If not, that's a probable explanation for the difference in behaviour.
> You could proba
Removing the inode check (-Y option) files are updated correctly to ext2fs.
So the command would be:
$ pax -rw -v -Z $files $target
So, it's something with the inode check what doesn't work with ext2fs.
I'm posting this here since I'm not sure if it's a bug or something I
did wrong. Today I upgraded to the latest snapshot and while booting to
the new system init ran syspatch(8). I can't figure out why.
dmesg:
OpenBSD 7.2 (GENERIC.MP) #720: Sun Sep 11 15:41:58 MDT 2022
dera...@amd64.openbsd
Hello everyone,
I wrote my own version of fmt, with some enhancements and a new feature
to break lines in *roff files.
https://en.roquesor.com/Downloads/fmtroff.c
In the head comment is explained why I reinvented the wheel. :-)
I guess someone could find it useful.
--
Walter
Hello Gilles,
In article <20181221145201.ga90...@ams-1.poolp.org> Gilles Chehade
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 07:41:41AM -0700, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /cvs
> > Module name: src
> > Changes by: gil...@cvs.openbsd.org 2018/12/21 07:41:41
> >
> > Modified files:
> >
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:59:58PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:56:57PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Hello Gilles,
> >
> > In article <20181221145201.ga90...@ams-1.poolp.org> Gilles Chehade
> > wrote:
> > >
Hello Gilles,
In article <20190101143249.ga41...@ams-1.poolp.org> Gilles Chehade
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 01:14:54PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:59:58PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at
Hello Gilles,
When some spammer try to reach an invalid address in my server the log
says "Invalid recipient":
[...] smtp failed-command command="RCPT TO: " result="550 Invalid
recipient: "
But, when the domain name part is valid (one of those included in my
"vdomains" and "valiases" tables), i
I know complaining is useless. Forgive me this time.
I'm about to run my own web server using OpenBSD. I'm giving my first
steps with pf. I was very enthusiastic till I got to this point:
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/logging.html
It says:
The log file written by pflogd is in binary for
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 02:36:10PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > So, *binary* logs. Sounds familiar to me. And then:
>
> Your type of person seems familiar to be me. Undeducated *check*
> opinioned *check* Contrasting authoritatively without any education
> to back it up *check*
>
> pflog g
To the other people who answer me here, sorry for the delay, I took some
time to calm down and not degrade myself to the level of discussion some
person here proposed me.
Martin Brandenburg,
I know what pcap files are, I used them. But, as I said, I'm not an
expert, I didn't take in care that c
I post this here because I don't know if considering it bug.
To use a macro in the "file" table option I had to enclose double on
single quotes:
blockIP='"/path/to/file"'
table persist file $blockIP
Any of these syntax examples return errors:
blockIP="/path/to/file"
blockIP=/path/to/fi
Does acme-client take in care /etc/acme-client.conf in any way?
Entries as the documented in acme-client.conf man page:
domain example.com {
alternative names { secure.example.com }
domain key /etc/ssl/private/example.com.key
domain certificate /etc/ssl/example.com.crt
Hi everyone,
First of all, is dkimproxy a work in progress?
If it's not, then the long one. I've tried something similar to
the example in smtpd.conf(5). Outgoing messages don't get signed.
# dkim-genkey -s default -d mydomain.com -r -D /var/dkimproxy
/etc/dkimproxy_out.conf
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0500, trondd wrote:
> On Wed, November 9, 2016 9:14 am, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > First of all, is dkimproxy a work in progress?
> >
> > If it's not, then the long one. I've tr
trondd,
Your response was also useful to me in another more important way.
I took a look to the headers of your message and I observe gmail says
your dkim is correct:
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@kagu-tsuchi.com;
However, I had to rescue your message from m
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:57:18AM -0500, trondd wrote:
> Should also be in the maillog.
Hey, I think I found the problem:
Nov 9 10:37:12 server dkimproxy.out[38514]: signing error: Error: cannot read
/var/dkimproxy/default.private: Permission denied
The permissions are:
# ls -l /var/dkimpro
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:13:47PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Taking in care /etc/rc.d/dkimproxy_out flags:
>
> daemon_flags="--conf_file=/etc/dkimproxy_out.conf --user=_dkimproxy
> --group=_dkimproxy"
>
> These files should be owned by _dkimproxy u
Is this on purpose?
I've tried adding 'set keep' to /etc/mail.rc and /root/.mailrc
but mail(1) still removes empty mailbox files before quiting.
Hello trondd,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:03:49AM -0500, trondd wrote:
> On Fri, November 25, 2016 4:17 am, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Is this on purpose?
> >
> > I've tried adding 'set keep' to /etc/mail.rc and /root/.mailrc
> > but mail(1
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:13:17PM -0500, trondd wrote:
> On Fri, November 25, 2016 12:36 pm, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Hello trondd,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:03:49AM -0500, trondd wrote:
> >> On Fri, November 25, 2016 4:17 am, Walter Alejandro
Hello everyone,
Is there a way to detect on the fly spam attacks like the pasted below
(maillog)? It seems pf max-src-conn-rate takes in care only the
"connected" event.
I obscured the recipients. Basically sorted addresses of the same target
Chinese host.
Nov 26 05:59:42 server smtpd[55880]:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> There's not much you can do besides adding the offending addresses in a
> pf blacklist.
Yeah, that's what I thought (at least using opensmtpd, I guess what
Claus quoted is from actual sendmail man page).
Thanks to all for answerin
I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly.
I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a
conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced.
I'm noticing messages with no spf or dkim records reach my gmail inbox.
At the same time, messag
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:11:30PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly.
> >
> > I was running my own mail server for a whil
It seems the size picked by the partitioner at install time for / isn't
large enough (I choose the defaults except I enlarged /var to run a web
server).
OpenBSD 6.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #25: Fri Dec 9 16:53:25 MST 2016
# dmesg | grep sd0 | grep MB | uniq
sd0: 476940MB, 512 bytes/sector, 9767731
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:32:07AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:26:31AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > # du -cs /bin /sbin /dev /bsd*
> > 20800 /bsd
> > 15552 /bsd.rd
> > 20704 /bsd.sp
> > 1932484 /dev
>
> Th
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
