Hi,
Just a little question that came up when designing a firewall system
here, can a transparent bridge with pf do load balance to internal
server even if the ifaces don't have any IP adresses?
I have two ways to develop this firewall, or a transparent bridge on the
switch to router link, or an "f
I'm currently using an OpenBSD 3.7 as a firewall for my network, since
this machines is a 1U rack I can't add an extra ethernet card to it, so
I was looking for an alternative solution to use redundancy, since there
are plenty of usb ports free can i use an usb-to-usb link over two
OpenBSD to do th
Hi,
I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with pf and bridge enabled for a transparent
proxy, and I'm having some packet loss somewhere in this bridge, since
netstat -ni doesn't give me any ierrors i'm beginning to check PF setup,
this machine has about 30k packets/s, my question is: how can i see if
pf is ok wit
Hi,
Thanks for the held Jared,
I tried to disable pf (pfctl -d) and it continues to loss packets, i
changed the rules to use state on all and raised the limit on it to
about 300.000, so i think this is not a problem, and since pfctl -d
didn't resolve the packet lost i begin to suspect something on
is negotiating properly. It might
>be half duplex instead of full or something flakey etc. Check the
>output of ifconfig.
>
>Joe
>
>On 9/19/05, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>Thanks for the held Jared,
>>
>>
jared r r spiegel wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:13:33PM -0300, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
>
>
>>I tried to disable pf (pfctl -d) and it continues to loss packets
>>
>>
><...>
>
>
>>The count on in and out are dif
Well,
I'm running a similar setup, only Xeon 2.4 dual and running with 300k
states, the info so far is:
State Table Total Rate
current entries89976
searches 2049646948754332.6/s
inserts
7 matches
Mail list logo