Re: will openbsd run on this system?

You should be able to find a better system than this.. I bought a Shuttle SN25P that runs OpenBSD very nicely. There are only a few issues. The on-board sound (some Via Envy24 chipset) doesn't work. It doesn't really matter because I use a M-Audio MobilePre (for tracking guitar stuff) that is conn

Re: nfe0 problem (obsd 4.1)

You might be interested in some unofficial patches I had created when experiencing the same thing. I hadn't officially released these because of the awful DELAY() timeout hack taken from the original nfe code from DragonFly BSD. Most of the updates were taken from NetBSD. Either way, what you woul

Re: nfe0 problem (obsd 4.1)

After applying the patches, you want to go into if_nfe.c, and after line 244 (PCI_PRODUCT_NVIDIA_MCP55_LAN2) you would want to put "sc->sc_encap_delay = 10;" On 6/27/07, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 27 June 2007 10:50, Tony Lambiris wrote: > You

AMD Releases 900+ Pages Of GPU Specs

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjA1Mw Thoughts?

Re: flashdist-20050601 for OpenBSD 3.7

kernel and mount the writeable parts of the system with mount_mfs -P? yes. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "End users are ruining computing."

Re: Booting off USB-stick emulated as floppy

t kind of machine is this? i386 http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tomcati845gl.html BIOS 2.01 "copied over"..how? (there's a lot of wrong ways. Few right ways) "dd if=floppy??.fs of=/dev/rsd0c bs=512" on other box "failed to boot"..how? "Loadi

Re: Problem compiling wget from ports

__ |- [EMAIL PROTECTED] |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it ___ You didn't mention if ou also upgraded your ports tree to 3.7-release or just the base binaries and Kernel. Yes, it is from 3.7 CD too. Bye.

Re: NFS sometime stalls

ake me worry is the hight value of the "Ret-Failed" field. Is it normal? I have no experience of NFS, is it normal that sometime ot stalls? What else I could do to prevent this to happen? Thanks. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps yo

Re: moving to a bigger disk

/ partition, then copy /var and /usr with tar/pax/cpio, switch the disks and pray it works. Do you think the above steps might work or did anyone do this before? Thank you for your time. Mihai IACOB -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are

Re: GRUB's boot parameter

of OSs. So I usualy boot any OS from GRUB in FD. If version of OpenBSD 3.7 's boot parameter changed or parameter I set was wrong, please let me know correct thing. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Tony

Dell Inspiron 700m

BIOS workaround). I still have yet to test sound and such (even though it is detected successfully), but once I straighten everything out with this laptop, I will post a dmesg and the code to fix the VBIOS. ROCKIN!! :) -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you th

openbsd fdisk

is there a way to have fdisk re-inititalize the disk (fdisk -i ) without being prompted to go ahead with the init? thanks. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does not help

vge0 on Abit Av8 (amd64)

at mainbus0 com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo com0: console pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 spkr0 at pcppi0 sysbeep0 at pcppi0 dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0

i386 binaries on amd64

Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box to run on amd64? or is there a sysctl option I am missing? Thanks. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does not help

Re: i386 binaries on amd64

architecture of input file `some.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output Is compiling this way possible at all? Ted Unangst wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Stuart Henderson wrote: --On 29 August 2005 16:34 -0500, Tony Lambiris wrote: Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBS

Re: DELL Latitude D400 without X

c. Stop in .. I bet quite a few newer DELL notebooks are affected; and I appreciate any suggestion how to make it work on OpenBSD. I read the archives here and googled. No result. Uwe -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are

i386 branch on amd64

I know this will run fine, but will the dual-core and such be detected and setup correctly, or is this an amd64 specific thing? TIA. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that doe

pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

rboard boxes), were brand new. Any suggestions? TIA. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does not help then perhaps should not use computers..."

Re: pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

I (think I) found the problem... I will be posting a patch shortly if I confirm my suspicions. Thanks. Tony Lambiris wrote: We have some motherboards with (what we think) are the same chips and revisions with the same hard drives, but some drives are being detected as DMA and others as

Re: pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

ny light that can be shed would be greatly appriciated. Thanks. Tony Lambiris wrote: I (think I) found the problem... I will be posting a patch shortly if I confirm my suspicions. Thanks. Tony Lambiris wrote: We have some motherboards with (what we think) are the same chips and revisio

Re: pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

I forgot to ask, would it be bad practice to just add PCI_PRODUCT_VIATECH_VT82C571 to one of the cases in the switch statement? It seems like this might go a little deeper Tony Lambiris wrote: Well I thought I knew what the problem was (nope).. I found something interesting though

Re: pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

else + reg |= (VP3_CFG_TRIGGER_EDGE << shift); pci_conf_write(ph->ph_pc, ph->ph_tag, VP3_CFG_PIRQ_REG, reg); break; Tony Lambiris wrote: I forgot to ask, would it be bad practice to just add PCI

Re: pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

ut it's a temporary fix for me. Over and out, sorry again for the noise. Tony Lambiris wrote: Sorry for all the noise, this seems to have fixed it (from NetBSD): --- via82c586.c.origMon Sep 12 19:38:35 2005 +++ via82c586.c Mon Sep 12 20:27:28 2005 @@ -256,9 +256,10 @@

Re: pciide: DMA vs. ATA133

in pciide.c, but cannot work out how to add PCI_PRODUCT_VIATECH_VT82C571. I'm running 3.8. thanks, Sebastian Tony Lambiris wrote: Man I must need sleep or something... this doesn't fix my problem, I forgot I had the extra case in the switch statement still in pciide.c. That did w

Re: Cannot boot version 3.8 on HP pavilion 422

Try: boot -c disable fdc Lionel Vidal wrote: I tried to boot the new 3.8 version on a (rather old) PC, a HP pavilion 422.fr. I tried both to boot from cdrom38.fs and floppy38.fs and the result is the same : OpenBSD i386 BOOT 2.10 boot> booting fd0a:/bsd: 3263620 Entry point at 0x100120 L

Re: nsswitch

probably not -- but we use ldap here at work, and the auth_ldap in the ports tree works great. Aiko Barz wrote: I googled, but I couldn't figure out the current status. My problem: I tried to move my mailservers from Linux to OpenBSD. It's a qmail-ldap system with its users stored in OpenLDAP.

Re: upgrade from src, gcc exception model problem [was Re: undefined reference to __gxx_personality_sj0]

dn't work for you, please let me know. Henning Brauer wrote: * Benjamin A. Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-06 08:22]: I installed 3.6 fresh from CD, no packages. 'make build' still fails. as others already pointed out a make build of 3.7 will not work on 3.6. -- Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] "End users are ruining computing."