Dear Group,
I would like to know what kind of environment you use for remote management
of one or more openbsd servers. Which KVM over IP solution would you
recomend.
Thanks
Tony
thanks for the prompt replies. Any recommendation for IPMI cards and KVM
over IP switches that work well with openbsd?
Tony
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 03:24 PM, Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> I would like to know what
Dear group,
what is the max RAM the current release can support?
Thanks
Tony
on a amd64 server. I don't know if the 4GB limit is still in place.
Thanks
Tony
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Zé Loff wrote:
> On your Zaurus or on your old mac or on your 386 or on your amd64 server
> or on your VAX or on your sparc64 or...?
>
> On 15/06/2013, at
Thanks
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-06-15, Tony Berth wrote:
> > on a amd64 server. I don't know if the 4GB limit is still in place.
>
> 4.9 is the last release which was limited to 4GB on amd64.
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/50.html
is anyone using goaccess 0.5 with 5.2 or 5.3?
When running './configure' I get:
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
d. Probably a change in version
0.5?
Unfortunately, 'configure' gives the same error. Should I send you the
config.log too?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i...@juanfra.info> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:01:11AM +0300, Tony Berth
Dear group,
is anyone running yacy on a openbsd box?
I tested the latest one yacy on a 5.3 amd64 but didn't succeed. The only
resource I found was:
http://ventejuy.es/cgi-bin/post?p=11051522005289 (in Spanish!)
but was unable to connect to localhost:8090
Thanks
Dear group,
I have following configuration:
- latest Ubuntu amd64 server
- VirtualBox running on the above Ubuntu server
- openbsd 5.3 (amd64) with mysql and chive installed and running inside
VirtualBox
when I try to connect to the openbsd mysql server from mysql workbench
installed in Ubuntu,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Bruno Flueckiger wrote:
> On 14.08.2013 14:21, Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> Dear group,
>>
>> I have following configuration:
>>
>> - latest Ubuntu amd64 server
>> - VirtualBox running on the above Ubuntu server
>> - op
Dear group,
when trying different php based open source packages on a chrooted 5.2 box,
I was faced with the problem not being able to send email from their php
script. All the times I get following entry in the maillog:
w...@example.com [x.x.x.x] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during
connect
did install both. Now, what are the settings in order to make them work?
Found following for femail:
http://rilk.com/en/doc/node/48
but these changes didn't have any effect. I still get the same error.
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02
Also, what about the pear-Mail package? Is there something I
should adapt?
Thanks for your help
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:23:46PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> > did install both. Now, what are the settings in order to
others
like statusnet are doing the same too. I have to say that vtiger crm is
working fine though!
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:19:14AM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> > I already have these settings implemented but I still get
-ETRN..250-DELIVERBY..250HELP..
---
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-09-02, Tony Berth wrote:
> > well the script does talk to google mail correctly so somehow it should
> > work.
>
> If the script is talking to google mail, it is going
Dear List,
I have following case:
-
||
-- | Firewall with Proxy:port [a2]
|
-
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> do you know what a2 is? you say it a "Firewall with Proxy"
> if it's a application layer gateway (alg) it actually acts as a MITM to
> forward your connection.
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Tony Berth wr
Dear List,
in a 4.4 box with Postgresql 8.3.3 I try to create a new tablespace in a
different filesystem and get the following error:
---
template1=# CREATE TABLESPACE OWNER LOCATION
'/home//db';
ERROR: could not set permissions on directory "/home//
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Tony Berth wrote:
>
>
>>> I just realised that my graph wasn't readable so I'll try here to
>> re-draw
>> it:
>>
>> -
>> client [a1]
>&
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:59:53PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> > Dear List,
> >
> > in a 4.4 box with Postgresql 8.3.3 I try to create a new tablespace in a
> > different filesystem
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:07:45PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Jason Dixon
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:59:53PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> > > > Dear
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:24:41PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Jason Dixon
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:07:45PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> > > > On We
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Tony Berth wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:24:41PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Jason Dixon
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On W
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:46:28PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> >
> > case#1:
> >
> > my "/home//db" dir is owned by _postgresql:_postgresql
>
> Wow, you've managed to completely ignore all ad
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jason Dixon
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:46:28PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
>>>
>>>> case#1:
>>>&
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Hall
>> wrote:
>>
>> Tony Berth wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jason Dixon
>>>> wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Hall
>> wrote:
>>
>> Tony Berth wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jason Dixon
>>>> wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:56:36PM +0100, Tony Berth wrote:
> >
> > very simple! Instead of '_postgresql' it was '_potgresql'! It was one 's'
> > missing! I had a rather small font defined
is a temp solution due to space constarints in '/var' on a test box.
Isn't meant to be an operational solution!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Dan Colish wrote:
> out of sheer morbid curiosity, why are you creating a tablespace owned by
> the _postgresql daemon user under /home?
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> Hi Diana,
>>
>> this is a 'dumb' proxy and allows http/https traffic only. So ports 80 and
>> 443!
>>
>> What I'm after is the ssh command I h
..@air] ~> cat ~/.ssh/config
> #
> #
> Host my-server-via-proxy
> Hostname my-server.com
> ProxyCommand ~/.ssh/pconn.sh %h %p
> TCPKeepAlive yes
> ServerAliveInterval 30
> #
> #
>
>
>
> and then just
> [p...@air] ~> ssh my-server-via-proxy
> to connect
>
>
&g
t;
> LocalForward 8080 127.0.0.1:8080
>
> and then set your web browser to use a proxy at 127.0.0.1:8080
>
>
>
> /Pete
>
>
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2009, at 13:45, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> > Hi Pete,
> >
> > by "http proxy" you mean your proxy sitting
Dear List,
what is the functional difference between a SOCKS implemented proxy and a
HTTP one?
Thanks
Tony
fig
>
> and search for it, there is even a similar example included.
>
>
> /Pete
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 16 Feb 2009, at 17:28, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> The order is the following:
>>
>> A(ssh client) - C(http proxy server) - - B(ssh server with
&g
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Olivier Cherrier wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I would like to setup a small box to backup some data and operate some
> basic network job. I mainly see the following boxes:
> _ Plextor PX-EH40L but seems to be very slow (1)
> _ Thecus N2100 (with 2 internal disks)
> _
Dear Group,
when establishing a ssh connection to a OpenBSD 4.4 server like:
ssh -p 443 -D 1000 u...@server.com
and try to route Thunderbird client via that SOCKS5 connection I get
following errors (used 'vvv'):
-/home/-$debug1:
Dear Group,
when trying to install the current 4.4 from th iso image in a AMD64
machine I get following error:
panic: pci_make_tag: bad request
is that due to some faulty H/W?
Just for the records, I was using that box with a debian install
without any problems!
Thanks
Tony
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:13:30 +0100
> Tony Berth wrote:
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > when trying to install the current 4.4 from th iso image in a AMD64
> > machine I get following error:
> >
> > panic:
Dear group,
I'm trying to run phpMyAdmin on a 5.1 box (i386) with MySQL 5.1.60
installed from the OpenBSD packages.
When I try to login I get:
#2002 Cannot log in to the MySQL server
Please note that the same mysql user is able to login remotely via the
MySQL GUI workbench!
Now, I came across
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Richard Toohey <
richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> On 10/26/12 09:35, Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> Dear group,
>>
>> I'm trying to run phpMyAdmin on a 5.1 box (i386) with MySQL 5.1.60
>> installed from the OpenBSD
Dear group,
I was trying to install OBSD 5.2 on a Fujitsu-Siemens PRIMERGY RX200 S2
(dual CPU) and I get following errors:
mpi0: timeout
mpi0: phys disk Async at 0 MHz width 8bit offset 0 QAS 0 DT 0 IU 0
em1 at pci3 dev 6 function 0 "Intel PRO/100MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: apic
, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Tony Berth
> wrote:
> > Dear group,
> >
> > I was trying to install OBSD 5.2 on a Fujitsu-Siemens PRIMERGY RX200 S2
> > (dual CPU) and I get following errors:
>
> By any chance
Thanks
Both i386 and amd64 fail! But, are that many differences between stable and
current?
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, MichaÅ Markowski
wrote:
> 2012/11/29 Tony Berth :
> > s a fresh install! I couldn't find a CD image for current or did I
> > miss something?
>
ype 6, code=0, pc=0
The operating system has halted
Please press any key to reboot
---
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 11/29/12 06:42, Tony Berth wrote:
> > Thanks
> >
> > Both i386 and amd64 fail! But, are that many differences
it is the current one (2012-12-02)
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> > here is the installation dmesg when trying to install the 5.2 i386
> snapshot:
>
> And the installation dme
indeed. Looks like the mixed it up. As long as I get the 'current' log I'll
send it to the list.
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Sebastian Reitenbach <
sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de> wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 03. Dezember 2012 17:57 CET, Tony Berth <
>
now I got the installation log of current trying the amd64 distro:
-
CD-ROM: 9F
Loading /5.2/AMD64/CDBOOT
probing: pc0 mem[620K 2046M a20=on]
disk: hd0+* cd0
>> OpenBSD/amd64 CDBOOT 3.19
boot>
booting cd0a:/5.2/amd64/bsd.rd: 3046708
8]=0xb8eb78
entry point at 0x1001e0 [7205c766, 34
Dear group,
I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail and would like to strip
following headers from the outgoing e-mails:
*Received:* from x.x.x.x
(SquirrelMail authenticated user )
by new.host.name with HTTP;
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:31:59 +0300
[from the above I would like to s
uld ever use it.
Thanks
Tony
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Tony Berth
> wrote:
> > I'm running a 386 5.2 OpenBSD box with sendmail and would like to strip
> > following headers from the outgoing e-mail
good point indeed. I tried with conf.pl but didn't have any effect. For
example, I turned version info off but still, sendmail propagates the
complete info.
Thanks
Tony
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:27, Tony Berth wrote:
>
at 9:27:14 +0300 Tony Berth
> > I want to display the IP of the mail server only, as client IPs isn't a
> > relevant info for the 'outside world'. The same applies to the
> 'User-Agent'
> > field.
> >
> > Concerning th
Dear Group,
I just realised that there is no jdk package in the AMD64 version of
the current, 4.4, OpenBSD release! Was it forgotten or is any reason
for that?
Thanks
Tony
On 11/16/08, Stephan Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 16. November 2008 18:32:55 schrieben Sie:
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> I just realised that there is no jdk package in the AMD64 version of
>> the current, 4.4, OpenBSD release! Was it forgotten or is any reason
>> for that?
>>
>> Thanks
I wasn't able to find 'tac' in OpenBSD! Is any reason for that or any
alternative?
Thanks for your help
Tony
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2008-07-24, Tony Berth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wasn't able to find 'tac' in OpenBSD! Is any reason for that or any
> > alternative?
>
> Depending on which s
I'm running the 4.3 with sendmail and use mutt as MUA. I did set
'assumed_charset' and 'allow_8bit' in muttrc but no effect! I also had a
look on sendmail but couldn't identify any wrongdoing either!
Actually I would rather prefer to have utf-8 for the body as well as for the
subject and header
T
I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in order to get a German one,
nothing happens! I get following reply:
keyboard.encoding -> de
but my keyboard is still on the US charset!
What do I miss?
Thanks fot your help
Tony
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Louis V. Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
>>>
&
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Louis V. Lambrecht escreveu:
> > Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> >>
> >>> I hav
is it possible to list the patches already applied in a v 4.6 installation?
Thanks
Tony
Dear OBSD list members,
in the meanwhile, are any changes to the following:
...
Make amd64 machines be able to use more than 4G ram, and crank the MAXDSIZ
to allow allocations/mmap() up to 8G.
...
as this was reported on:
...
http://www.openbsd.org/plus44.html
...
For example to extend it, let
g a problem with 8GB?
>
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> > Dear OBSD list members,
> >
> > in the meanwhile, are any changes to the following:
> >
> > ...
> > Make amd64 machines be able to use more than 4G ram, and crank the
&g
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Janne Johansson wrote:
>
>
> 2011/3/30 Tony Berth
>
>> currently not but this machine will be a DB server (Postgresql +
ned to you.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=130176586700354&w=2
>
> Next step:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
>
> 2011/3/30 Tony Berth
>
>> Thank you for that clarification
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:52
when trying to patch a new i386 installation with the first patch I get the
following:
# patch -p0 < 001_kerberos.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Apply by doing:
| cd /usr/src
| patch
-p0 < 001_kerberos.patch
as referred in:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.7/common/001_kerberos.patch
Thanks
Tony
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 06/18/10 09:42, Tony Berth wrote:
> > when trying to patch a new i386 installation with the first
01 still gives the same error!
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> did the following:
>>
>> after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting
>>
>> applied:
>>
>> # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rO
Hi,
dmesg keeps displaying following entry:
wd0i: device fault reading fsbn 4146624 of 4146624-4146655 (wd0 bn 85997799;
cn 5353 tn 29 sn 27), retrying
pciide1:0:0: recal drive fault
there are 2 IDE HDs connected. Should I derive that the HD is dead?
Thanks
68 matches
Mail list logo
