with the ixl(4) / iavf(4)
drivers when used in an SR-IOV setup...
I hope this helps,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 00:56, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello,
> from bare metal testing the ixl driver didn't have any jitter, but when IXL
> card
> it was passed through with SR-IOV on a KVM vir
) type nics
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:31, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried SR-IOV and intel I350 1Gb/s nic hardware being passed through
> to OpenBSD 6.6 amd64
> the intel i350 passed through as a physical function on PCI-E is
> detected as an em(4)
> older major version?
>
> Many thanks and wishing peaceful holidays!
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
et 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 broadcast 0.0.0.1 pppoedev
re0 authproto chap
And that seemed to make my connection work. I'm not sure why, but it had to do
something with my side
not accepting the peer's IP.
-Tom
l be considered
just bear in mind the the License Requirements and Coding Style KNF
when submitting a diff and do it off current...
>
> Regards,
> --
> Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
>
> I haven't lost my mind...
> ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Hi Karel,
Thanks, for the correction...
I thought zfs was bigger than that ;)
Thanks
On Wednesday, 8 January 2020, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
>
> On 1/8/20 12:44 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
>> As far as im aware there are 2 concerns about ZFS,
>> 1) its license is not BSD
ld provide forwarding packets
between tap0 and tap1 in userland
so that any performance testing on tap(4) interfaces does not have the
distractions of complex userland programs with encryption /
encapsulation overheads
Thanks for your time
Tom Smyth
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Sorry
I realised I forgot to mention the version openvpn-2.4.7p1 and
OpenBSD6.6 Stable (amd64)
running on a 2 core (1socket) Xeon e5v2 KVM Guest with Q35 Vm type
with intel ix(4) nics
I will test against Current also once I have gotten a baseline on the
release+ Patches version
Thanks,
Tom Smyth
best way forward...
Regards,
Tom Smyth
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 21:08, Johannes Krottmayer wrote:
>
> On 10.01.20 at 17:26, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > We won't help you because we oppose the lack of a security barrier
> > in such designs.
>
> Detailed explanation
just trying to do a benchmark of release /stable vs current also )
Thanks for this it is a help
as I was trying and (losing with socat) I think socat port on
OpenBSD6.6 amd64
is compiled without tap / tun support
cheers,
Tom Smyth
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 10:38, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
&g
Thanks Claudio,
Ill investigate a little further
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 03:09, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:44:35AM +0000, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Claudio,
> > Thanks for this,
> > I compiled it on Openbsd 6.6 (stable) amd64
> >
> > i
Thanks Claudio,
the program now seems to run without exiting ... Ill do some tests
and get back to you
later
Tom Smyth
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 03:09, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:44:35AM +0000, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Claudio,
> > Thanks for this,
>
-- Forwarded message -
From: Tom Smyth
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 11:15
Subject: Re: tap(4) performance tuning on (amd64)
To: Tom Smyth , Misc
Thanks Claudio,
the program now seems to run without exiting ... Ill do some tests
and get back to you
later
Tom Smyth
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at
s show no
> measurable performance difference between the different modes (for either
> tun or tap).
I will re-run the test using bsd rather than bsd.mp if that would help ?
Thanks
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
identifying the hardware config on
your OpenBSD Box
Hope this helps,
Tom Smyth
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 22:59, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:30:51PM +0300, Özgür Kazancci wrote:
> > Hello everyone! Greetings to misc people!
> >
> > Got a brand new de
cast-addresses/
> [3] -
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-v6ops-larger-ipv6-loopback-prefix-04
> -|-|-|-|-|-|-|--
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
tches, rebooted the system, aand...Tada! "inteldrm0
> is back,
> >> > b1tch3z!" :)
> >> >
> >> > Dmesg has again: "init: can't open /dev/console: Device not
> configured" and
> >> > delays there. No boot, again.
> >> >
> >> > My questions are:
> >> >
> >> > How can I get the rid of the error "init: can't open /dev/console:
> Device
> >> > not configured" to be able to boot into the system?
> >> >
> >> > if that was the only way (disabling inteldrm), would I repeat it each
> time I
> >> > issue syspatch?
> >> >
> >> > And each time syspatch (re)installs the kernel, should I get the error
> >> > "reorder_kernel: failed", because I modified (disabled inteldrm)
> kernel?
> >> >
> >> > Any words on "kbc: cmd word write error" when I tried the 'boot -c'?
> >> >
> >> > I thank you for your time in reading all these,
> >> > And many thanks for your suggestions, in advance!
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> > Özgür Kazancci
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andreas (Kusalananda) Kähäri
> >> SciLifeLab, NBIS, ICM
> >> Uppsala University, Sweden
> >>
> >> .
> >>
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
file?
> 2. Should the vlan interface name follow vlan or vnetid?
> 3. Does it need to change the pppoedev interface to fxp0 or vlan500 or
> something else?
>
> Please advise. Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Peter Wong
> 016-396 3326
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
I've just updated to the latest snap, and now every SSH connection I
make is asking me to accept updated hostkeys.
$ ssh somehost
Learned new hostkey: RSA SHA256:
Learned new hostkey: ED25519 SHA256:
Accept updated hostkeys? (yes/no):
I see that some changes have been occurring ar
On 2017-10-28 21:20, x9p wrote:
Hi,
Coming from the Linux world, I wonder if there is a better alternative
to fail2ban, already being used in OpenBSD servers by the majority.
cheers.
x9p
The pf firewall provides the capability to block brute force attacks.
See max-src-conn-rate.
https://w
On 2017-11-04 09:28, Implausibility wrote:
I simply want to create a single partition encompassing all of the
available space.
I've searched the web, plus read searched the last 11k+ messages on
misc@ -- but I can't seem to find any examples of defining a disk with
disklabel non-interactively.
Hello All
I havent seen much by way of advice about multiqueue virtio
support on OpenBSD and I was wondering do other users use it ?
does anyone have experience with setting the number of virtio
queues in Proxmox for an OpenBSD guest ?
It is suggested by
proxmox / KVM to set the number of Queues p
, and split the 70 Vlans
across 2 interfaces
ie I had 35 vlans on 2 virtio interfaces and then the 70 vlans were
bridged onto a
third virtio interface. This seemed to reduce the loss that I had.
Hope this helps and Stefan Thanks for your feedback
Tom Smyth
On 1 December 2017 at 07:39, Stefan
command top -SH) only
interrupt handling of packets ?
or does it cover processing (e.g. forwarding if enabled ) (either
bridging or routing depending on network config)
any advice welcome ...
Thanks
Tom Smyth
t me
directly and I will give you a download link if you want to archive
it or host it on your own website...
Thanks for your time and I hope you enjoy the video
Tom Smyth
27 October 2017 at 07:18, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello Theo, Mike, All,
>
> @Theo Understood it is important to protect developers and the project goals
> ... @Mike Thanks for your Generosity in the time you took on this thread,
> Yes I want Mike to make VMM more awesome :) @Mike keep u
Hello
when I the following commands in openbsd
date;sleep 1;date;uptime
I get the following output ads you can see there is a 20 second
delay instead of a 1 second delay
Sun Dec 31 11:22:15 GMT 2017
Sun Dec 31 11:22:35 GMT 2017
11:22AM up 11:20, 2 users, load averages: 1.02, 0.99, 0.89
kern.ti
work better because they don't
> require to grab the KERNEL_LOCK().
>
>> any advice welcome ...
>
> What do you want to achieve? Better performances? With which setup?
In this case Im simply using OpenBSD as a bridging devices to combine
(bridge) a load of vlans
into 1vl
c0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 irq 1 irq 12
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
spkr0 at pcppi0
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0 configu
Hi all, happy new year...
Above my pay grade... but I did go to sleep thinking about Dancing in
the Dark ... THought of KARL ASLR and thought ... this might just
work... for a song...
Ode to KARL
Some OS get up in the evening, and they ain't got nothing to say
they come home in the morning,
sorry all,
I had posted to the tech mailing list about this .. I came across these 2
papers and they may be of interest about the CPU Security flaws
https://spectreattack.com/
I hope this helps
Tom Smyth
Hello Daniel,
I don't know as Im not a core developer... the Vuln was embargoed so my guess
is a lot of people were in the dark.
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 4 January 2018 at 13:31, Daniel Boyd wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2018, at 5:43 AM, Tom Smyth wrote:
>>
>> sorry all,
>>
&
>>So I will be most interested to see the OpenBSD take on this after the
>> embargo period is over.
>How long is embargo period?
apparently Intel were aware of one of issues as early as Late June
Last year... and
late july for another issue ...
it will be interesting how quickly a handful of V
Hardware that is
incompatible with
OpenBSD as opposed to change in OpenBSD that has caused the issue,
in my humble opinion it is more likely a old driver incompatibility
with newer (Virtual) hardware.
I hope this helps
Tom Smyth
ed
to work fine )
disable kvm_intel.preemption_timer on the host (see \
> /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/preemption_timer ) This seems to be buggy in
> linux \
> 4.10 and newer
On 12 January 2018 at 13:11, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello Todd,
>
> This issue (Virtual hardware issue
following command
echo options kvm-intel preemption_timer=N >>/etc/modprobe.d/kvm-intel.conf
Thanks,
Tom Smyth
On 30 December 2017 at 23:25, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello I have repeated OpenBSD 6.2 Testng on Proxmox PVE
> 5.1 3r Relasee CD
>
> The console does not hang like in pre
havent encountered any kernel panics
(when I create the VM I use the Freebsd 64 Bit OS as the installed OS
setting in vmware)
and amd64 OpenBSD
Im using Vm virtual hardware version 11
the Nics on physical servers are a mix between Broadcom Netxtreme and
intel pro 1000
I hope this helps
Tom Smyth
On
Hi Andrew
Try replacing
route-reflector
cluster-id 202.49.106.0
With
route-reflector 202.49.106.0
On 26 Jan 2018 3:56 AM, "Andrew Thrift" wrote:
Hi,
I am using OpenBGPD and trying to specify a cluster-id in a route
reflector setup.
Configuration is:
neighbor 43.231.192.241 {
remote-as 13
Hello
Im not so sure if this is relevant or not but sometimes when installing
6.2.fs onto a usb stick it wont boot in one of the exterior front USB3
Ports, I pretty much dismissed this as an electrical connection issue
but maybe there is more to it ...Unfortunately I only use USB3 for
installing Op
do not personally gain in any way from doing this.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri,
> National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden (NBIS),
> Uppsala University, Sweden.
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth
Mobile: +353 87 6193172
The information contained
t;you end up on a secure page" argument goes and, given the quality of
some spearphishing, the appearance of the page as well. Of course, none
of that would be possible if all of the pages were TLS encrypted.
Tom
Afaik swap is encrypted anyway on OpenBSD
On 8 Feb 2018 6:52 PM, "Tinker" wrote:
Hi misc@,
I looked through previous discussions on whether a SWAP partition
should be inside or outside the RAID partition when making a crypto
softraid.
The only argument I stumbled into was that it should be out
Also use noatime mount option so whe reading files you are not updating
access time
On 8 Feb 2018 7:36 PM, "Tinker" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I understand mount(8) (http://man.openbsd.org/mount) right, FFS
> mounts have a metadata I/O mode and a data I/O mode. By default,
> metadata is accessed sync
Also use noatime mount option so whe reading files you are not updating
access time
Ie there would be writes to disk everytime u access a file if noatime is
not set
On 8 Feb 2018 7:36 PM, "Tinker" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I understand mount(8) (http://man.openbsd.org/mount) right, FFS
> moun
Hi Zolt
you can open the message on a command terminal ... copy and paste
the message manually into a working email client,
make sure the subject and email addresses are consistent
I hope this helps ...
Tom Smyth
On 8 February 2018 at 21:37, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> Hello, I'm very ne
Hi Charlie,
https://sivers.org/openbsd is another good site to view :)
@Joren that is commitment the Tat :)
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 8 February 2018 at 22:12, Jeroen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenBSD has a clear and proactive stance when it comes to security,
> while Arch does not. If you want
Thanks kevin i missed the dump part... agree with disable dump on prod
..enable on dev
On 8 Feb 2018 22:51, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:39:39 +
>
>
> > Afaik swap is encrypted anyway on OpenBSD
>
> It is with a random key which is actually more secure than the softraid
>
Hi Martin... can you give a specific case where you have experienced
negative impacts from thevmount options i suggested...
It would be good to know...
Thanks Martin
Tom Smyth
On 10 Feb 2018 12:50 AM, wrote:
> > From tom.sm...@wirelessconnect.eu Thu Feb 8 23:37:59 2018
> > Fro
ation
units on the filesystem are aligned with the underlying SSD disk
which are usually split in to 1MB blocks
I Hope this helps
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 11 February 2018 at 05:06, Tinker wrote:
> My original question was which mounting options are optimal for FFS
> filesystems on SSD:s, for
llo,
> I'm using the latest release. Where the dl speed in other OS is approx. 1.4
> MB/s in BSD is only approx. 240 KB/s. Why is this? Is about a setting in some
> config file that limits download/traffic rate?
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth
Mobile: +353
Hi Zolt
when your laptop is on line try
fw_update -a
command to update firmware... you probably were not online when the
firmware update command ran (on first boot after install)
See what happens when you run that command ..
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 11 February 2018 at 23:15, Zsolt Kantor wrote
my humble opinion)
check man pf.conf for more details on limits
There have been a number of improvements to syn flood handling made by henning
so you can try -current if you want to see further improvements
Regards,
Tom Smyth
On 12 February 2018 at 00:26, Martin Hanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
&
for best value
By the way... if you are doubting the switch (and you dont have tech specs
of the switch or you cant monitor it .. or get counters off it ...
then there is no doubt ... :)
Regards,
Tom Smyth
On 12 February 2018 at 00:26, Martin Hanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a hom
advice
was that the ability to check counters on each interface can indicate where
the packets are being dropped are the being dropped beween switch ports or
on the open bas firewall etc
On 12 Feb 2018 1:59 PM, "Stuart Henderson" wrote:
> On 2018-02-12, Tom Smyth wrote:
> >
e
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth
Mobile: +353 87 6193172
The information contained in this E-mail is intended only for the
confidential use of the named recipient. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering it to the recipient, you are
m.
>>>
>>> Maybe this is fixed in current but I though I should report.
>>> # head -1 /var/run/dmesg.boot
>>> OpenBSD 6.2-beta (GENERIC.MP) #104: Mon Sep 18 23:31:27 MDT 2017
>>>
>>> I'll try an upgrade later today...
>>>
>>&g
little bit before moving onto the PC Engines x86 APU C2
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 21 February 2018 at 18:18, Diana Eichert wrote:
> Hey, at least some people think these systems are interesting.
>
> I gave up trying to build much of anything on the Ubiquiti USG. I really
> bought it to
Hi Xianwen,
if you try with the USB Boot device... you can see if you can load it .
then I suggest you get a compact low profiile USB key so that it
doenst snag on your bag when putting
the laptop back in the case
Tom
On 22 February 2018 at 02:11, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Dear Steve,
&g
d: loaded ca file ca.crt
>> ca_reload: loaded crl file ca.crl
>> ca_reload: /O=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3
>> ca_reload: /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3
>> ca_reload: loaded 2 ca certificates
>> ca_reload: loaded cert file b
gt;
>> Comment:
>> download, verify and patch bsd.rd image
>>
>> Description:
>> upobsd is a ksh(1) script designed to download, verify and optionally patch
>> bsd.rd image.
>>
>> upobsd will download bsd.rd image using ftp(1) from mirror defined in
>> installurl(5), will v
ets far enough in the boot
> process to enable the network (networking *does* work while I am running
> through the installer, so I don't think it's just a missing network driver
> there).
>
> What can I do to fix this?
>
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smy
check your pf.conf configuration also,
as Pf works on Bridged Packets also,
another approach would be to tag packets comming in on em2 from bad mac
lets call the tag bad-dhcp-requests
have a look a puting something like this in your hostname.bridgeX
rule pass in on em2 src tag BAD-DHCP
Paul ...
You could look at pmacct by Paulo Lucende he is a cool guy...
It has multiple flow aggregation and translation capabilities ...
I dont think it is in ports yet... id like to get off my ass and do it some
day as i think it is awesome ...
On 13 Mar 2018 12:08, "Paul Ammann" wrote:
> Hi
Peter Thanks Buddy ... I dont know How I missed that :)
Got to try that out on OpenBSD So
Thanks for the Tipp Peter...
On 13 March 2018 at 17:03, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On 03/13/18 17:44, Tom Smyth wrote:
>> Paul ...
>> You could look at pmacct by Paulo Lucen
y: error:04FFF071:rsa
>> routines:CRYPTO_internal:null before block missing
>
> Not sure if this is supposed to be taken care of, but I am still seeing the
> following messages in 6.3-beta.
> $ uname -a
> OpenBSD lb2l 6.3 GENERIC.MP#58 amd64
>
> Mar 13 23:43:38 lb2 relayd[96581]: ca
running this particular job
between 11PM and 1am prevent the edge case from having
an impact
Peace out
Tom Smyth
On 9 April 2018 at 21:45, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Stephane HUC "PengouinBSD" <
> b...@stephane-huc.net> wrote:
>
>>
idea
>>> of having a niche architecture for my internet facing machines.
>>
>> niche archs are nice, but if you do not have code of firmware to see what's
>> its doing inside, then it's kind of meaningless.
>> PC Engines can provide you with their coreboot
or to run my home network on.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >Just curious, why this and not amd64 bit with something like the
>> >pcengine apu2 board? I know it only has three NICs, so it's likely a
>> >non-started for the OP, but it's 64bi
Mischa
Hows it going ?
have you tried index.* for both html and php index support ?
I have been bailed out by the * before on php apps with seo friendly urls
On Wed 11 Apr 2018, 21:50 Mischa, wrote:
>
> > On 11 Apr 2018, at 22:40, Bryan Harris wrote:
> >
> > I'll ask a dumb question. Why do y
Hi Mischa
directory index "index.*"
To allow serving of index.php if its in the directory or index.html if that
is in the directory
When both are present in a directory im not sure what would happen though
On Wed 11 Apr 2018, 21:55 Mischa, wrote:
>
> > On 11 Apr 2018,
Not at 150$ ... sorry will u get 10G kit let alone line rate 10G kit...
On Fri 13 Apr 2018, 01:46 Joel Wirāmu Pauling, wrote:
> Can they do 14MPPS aka 10GBIT ?
>
> That's what I am looking for in pretty much in anything I would vaguely
> consider to replace the n3160's I have as my target devic
be a waste of
time...
Also im not sure how open the architecture and if they have some bsd
licensed code / reference implentation to get development started on it
I hope this helps
Tom Smyth
On Mon 16 Apr 2018, 19:42 Diana Eichert, wrote:
> I subscribe to the OpenBSD arm list but was wo
d be
super awesome for OpenBSD
it would be alot of work with limited help from the
new owners of the
CPU
all the Best,
Tom Smyth
On 16 April 2018 at 23:21, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Diana Eichert wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> > Diana Eichert wrote:
Lads, and ladies,
I was wondering if anyone else comes across this
issue where Openvpn client gives the following error
04:38:33 78906 openvpn[56335]: Control Channel Authentication: using
'/etc/openvpn/tlsauth.pem' as a OpenVPN static key file
Apr 16 04:38:33 78906 openvpn[56335]: UDPv4 link l
> for the network port to configure?
>
> Just a suggestion, of course
> Harri
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
impacting someone's terminal (as highlighted
by Theo and Nick)
All the best,
Tom Smyth
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 16:10, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Nick Holland wrote:
>
> > On 2020-10-29 08:00, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > do you
m, I'm afraid, but iridium does work
> I'm glad to say. Many thanks.
>
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Campbellhttps://www.acampbell.uk
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
:13:37 age 3s
>
> Unfortunately, I don't really know how to dig any deeper at this issue.
> Does anyone here see a glaring mistake or would be able to nudge me in
> a better direction?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
t; prometheus$ cat /etc/hostname.em0
> dhcp
> prometheus$ cat /etc/hostname.em1
> up
> prometheus$ cat /etc/hostname.em2
> up
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:10 AM Tom Smyth
> wrote:
> >
> > what is your ifconfig em0
> > ifconfig em1
> > ?
> >
> > O
96 - 3 re0
> 192.168.7.48c:ec:4b:7a:04:dc UHLl 0 184 - 1 re0
> 192.168.7.255 192.168.7.4UHb00 - 1 re0
>
>
> the pf rules when pf enabled
>
> pfctl -sr
> block return all
> pass all flags S/SA
> block return in on ! lo0 proto tcp from any to any port 6000:6010
> block return out log proto tcp all user = 55
> block return out log proto udp all user = 55
> pass out log on aggr0 inet proto icmp from 10.10.70.0/24 to any label
> "pings"
> pass out log on aggr0 inet proto icmp from 10.10.77.0/24 to any label
> "pings"
> pass out log on aggr0 inet proto icmp from 10.10.79.0/24 to any label
> "pings"
> pass in on vlan70 all flags S/SA label "vlan70" tag vlan70
> pass out on vlan70 all flags S/SA label "vlan70o" tag vlan70o
>
> sysctl for ip forwarding is set
>
> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
>
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
confirm that you are not doing any DHCP stuff / DHCP guard /
dhcp snooping in Unifi Switch which might affect network connectivity if
you have a dhcp server running on OpenBSD Box
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:50, len zaifman wrote:
> Thanks Tom,Aaron: I did 2 things,
>
> 1 re IPs
t; That's why, I think it can be a network related issue but still we need
> some help :)
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Berkay
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
their top line license enterprise Plus (last
time i checked)
it is a pitty because I do like Vmware and moving off it was tough as
breaking an addiction...
Hope this helps
Tom Smyth
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 at 22:10, Heinrich Rebehn
wrote:
> Unfortunately, switching to vmx(4) did *not* do
OpenBSD
All the Best
Tom Smyth
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 18:28, Heinrich Rebehn
wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Thank you very much for your in-depth explanations.
>
> Actually enabling mac changes and forged transmits did the trick. A HUGE
> trick:
>
> While A was pinging R, I t
interesting to see if they open
it up (a little) ... but it is an arm chip ... so perhaps testing and
providing
open arm hardware would help the project more... check out want.html
all of these are my own observations as a user over the years and im not
a developer in OpenBSD
Thanks
Tom SMyth
On
ay a lot of groundwork needed for
> porting
> > >> OpenBSD to the platform. He apparenetly will also do his work in a
> > >> dual-licensed fashion, so the BSDs will easily profit from it.
> > >>
> > >> So, the first steps are basically to follow Marcan's work and use all
> > >> that information and code to port OpenBSD as well.
> > >>
> > >> This *will* take some time, because essentially there are only the
> > >> binary drivers, but it's doable and I think with a bit of patience
> > >> we will have OpenBSD running on the M1 as well.
> > >>
> > >> Biggest hurdle, as always, will be support for graphics acceleration.
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Clearly I missed Patriks Email ... earlier.. :/ sorry folks
+1 if experienced Devs are working on it... it will happen
Best of luck to the people working on getting it working ... cant be easy
without all the docs ...
Thanks
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 22:39, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
em0 at pci0 dev 31 function 6 "Intel I219-V" rev 0x11: msi, address
> f8:75:a4:c8:62:06
> isa0 at pcib0
> isadma0 at isa0
> pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 irq 1 irq 12
> pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
> wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard
> pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
> wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
> pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
> spkr0 at pcppi0
> vmm0 at mainbus0: VMX/EPT
> efifb at mainbus0 not configured
> uhidev0 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 interface 0 "Yubico YubiKey
> OTP+FIDO+CCID" rev 2.00/5.26 addr 2
> uhidev0: iclass 3/1
> ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 variable keys, 6 key codes
> wskbd1 at ukbd0 mux 1
> uhidev1 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 interface 1 "Yubico YubiKey
> OTP+FIDO+CCID" rev 2.00/5.26 addr 2
> uhidev1: iclass 3/0
> fido0 at uhidev1: input=64, output=64, feature=0
> ugen0 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 "Yubico YubiKey OTP+FIDO+CCID" rev
> 2.00/5.26 addr 2
> uvideo0 at uhub0 port 8 configuration 1 interface 0 "Azurewave Integrated
> Camera" rev 2.01/69.05 addr 3
> video0 at uvideo0
> uvideo1 at uhub0 port 8 configuration 1 interface 2 "Azurewave Integrated
> Camera" rev 2.01/69.05 addr 3
> video1 at uvideo1
> vscsi0 at root
> scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets
> softraid0 at root
> scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets
> sd1 at scsibus3 targ 1 lun 0:
> sd1: 976761MB, 512 bytes/sector, 2000407649 sectors
> root on sd1a (69b037e186d738a3.a) swap on sd1b dump on sd1b
> inteldrm0: 3840x2160, 32bpp
> wsdisplay0 at inteldrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0
> wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0
> wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (std, vt100 emulation)
> iwm0: hw rev 0x310, fw ver 34.3125811985.0, address f8:e4:e3:30:0a:07
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
ssue
> > manifested itself.
> >
> > Is anyone aware of incompatibilities between the OSPF implementation within
> > OpenBSD and that provided by quagga on FreeBSD? Or of any limitations of
> > OSPF on OpenBSD?
> >
> > In each setup I have the same hello and dead interval and have md5 crypt
> > authentication in place on each link between routers. Each router is in
> > area 0.0.0.0.
> >
> > regards,
> > Mark
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
something like this is that I want to
> add a 10GbE NIC and switch into my production router platform while
> still keeping the same setup going to the 1GbE switch which is running
> in a 4-port LACP trunk.
>
>
>
> Of course an alternate would be to link the 1GbE switch to the 10GbE
> switch and do things that way, but the above would be more practical
> from a cabling sense.
>
>
>
> Has anyone got any ideas?
>
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
> Kaya
>
>
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
can do
> to extract the errors ? ( i do not see com ports anywhere either )
>
> Thank you for reading.
> --
> --
>
> -----
> Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
service off by default would reduce the
default attack surface of the OS ?
perhaps the installer could use the answer to the question do you
intend to run X to determine whether or not to enable the sndiod
daemon ?
I hope this helps
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
sense as it
is likely such system is for users who may need audio
Just a thought
Thanks
On Sunday, 21 February 2021, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Tom Smyth(tom.sm...@wirelessconnect.eu) on 2021.02.21 04:08:48 +:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering should sndiod (default)
sndiod to my deploy ment scripts
for my use cases :)
Thanks again to all who considered it
:)
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 14:28, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian
> I get users want to listen to audio but if the only hardware is a buzzer and
> the user is not running x what are the chan
sk of other software that I use on top of OpenBSD
I couldn't agree more with you
Thanks again..
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 18:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-21, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > my thinking is by having the service off by default would reduce the
> > defa
ot sure what is different here.
> >
> > >
> > > Any pointing to the right direction would be appreciated. (If this
> > problem
> > > relates to Xorg specifically and not to OpenBSD please let me know).
> > >
> > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=161754767328009&w=2
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Michel
> > >
> >
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Try Current and 6.8 and see if you get a different result in each..
dmesgs are key for getting help on this type of query ...
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 11:33, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hi Michel,
> if you send the dmesg from OpenBSD when it is installed and Ubuntu
> it would help al
...
suggested current as the bug might already be fixed in current as
opposed to release ...
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 11:56, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:34:54AM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Try Current and 6.8 and see if you get a different result in each..
> >
Hello
6.9 Current amd64 xfce seems to freeze and not respond to mouse
clicks or keystrokes. I cant seem to change windows or enter text on
the X terminal
im running OpenBSD on an Oracle Virtualbox VM
however + does work and im able to restart the x
session using the console
rcctl restar
Apr 2021 at 19:33, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> 6.9 Current amd64 xfce seems to freeze and not respond to mouse
> clicks or keystrokes. I cant seem to change windows or enter text on
> the X terminal
>
>
> im running OpenBSD on an Oracle Virtualbox VM
>
> howe
201 - 300 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
