Hi,
since IPv6 is now supported in httpd -- :-) --, I'm trying to get my
web server to use it.
But somehow I can't find how to correctly configure VirtualHosts with
IPv6 addresses : every combination of
"IPv6_address",
"IPv6_address port", and
"[IPv6_address]:port"
in NameVirtualHost and Virtu
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:17:39 +0100
Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Vallet wrote:
> [..]
> > Would I be missing something?
>
> The fact that generally people use NAMES and not IP addresses?
>
> It is not called "__Name__VirtualHost" for
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:59:08 +0100
Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My bad, mixing up between those two ;)
> Nevertheless note that the 1.3 docs might not apply to the special
> version of apache in openbsd, in part due to the IPv6 patch.
Somewhere I hope the devs didn't modify the co
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:30:41 +0100
Dieter Rauschenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try
>
> # httpd -t -U
Works! Which is odd, because the bracket notation doesn't seem very
ambiguous to me. But hey.
Thank you,
Simon
Hi all,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:52:22 +0100
"Good Good" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Free.fr is the first general public ISP in France to provide IPV6 to its
> customers (it seems that I would be lucky) :)
Just a minor correction there: it is *not* -- Nerim has been routing /48
IPv6 blocks to ever
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:04:59 +0100
Stiphane Chausson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a [1]press communiqui (in french, sorry) they say they give 2^64 ip
> address to every customer.
> To me, total ipv6 beginner, it seems a lot !
> What is bad with "/64" ?
> Are they sort of lying ? Playing with wo
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:37:44 +0100
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In an educational context (teaching children something
> different than MS WinXP) After booting I would like to login
> automatically as a normal user (in other words, to find the
> prompt of the ordinary user
page useful :
http://www.castalie.org/Linux/C610-OS.html
HTH,
Simon
--
Simon Vallet
http://www.castalie.org/pubkey.txt
Due to massive spam, the address shown in the From: header only accepts
mail from debian hosts. If you wish to email me offlist, just use the
'user' local part.
Hi,
I'm just in the process of upgrading to 3.9 from a root-on-RAID 3.8
-stable install. I fetched the sources from the CD, built a
RAID-enabled kernel, and rebooted : the kernel hangs after issuing
"Kernelized RAIDframe activated" and won't go further.
Browsing through the archives, I notice thi
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:09:03 +0200
Mitja Mu>enih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I even tried to replicate the problem locally on supposedly same
> hardware (HP Compaq dc5100 + 2x SATA HDDs) but here I couldn't get it
> to hang on raidframe. I did manage to consistently hang it by
> enabling the front
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:59:30 +0200
Simon Vallet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dmesg and the console output with RAIDDEBUG enabled follow -- it
> appears the two RAID members are indeed recognized, but they somehow
> can't be mounted as the root dev.
After some crude debu
Hi,
I'm currently trying to set up a root-on-raid server using RAIDframe.
Compiling a suitable kernel and building the array didn't cause much
problems, but somehow I can't get the setup to be persistent across
reboots -- the spare drive on which the mirror was reconstructed just
doesn't get incor
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:26:45 +0200
Simon Vallet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I suspect this is due to a problem with the raidframe label on wd0d, but
> I have no clue on how to fix this :
It turns out the component label simply hadn't been written on wd0,
since my r
13 matches
Mail list logo
