Hello,
I can't figure out what causes this panic. Second time
I see this. I think I have to replace the NIC or the disk.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Sebastian
OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC) #149: Tue May 7 12:44:38 MDT 2013
t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i3
wbsio0 at isa0 port 0x2e/2: W83697HF rev 0x16
lm1 at wbsio0 port 0x290/8: W83697HF
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
usb1 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "SiS OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 "SiS OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at ohci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 "SiS OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
vscsi0 at root
scsibus0 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus1 at softraid0: 256 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct
fixed sd0: 953869MB, 512 bytes/sector, 1953524576 sectors
root on wd0a (83291e85336d8f4d.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
--
Sebastian Neuper
so my webpage, which is exported with nfs to the 'right' htdocs
directory. With a simple backup script, an install.site, rc.firsttime
and siteXX.tgz, staying on current feels like just a long reboot.
Thanks for your help!
Best,
Sebastian.
[1] http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754350.aspx
--
Sebastian Neuper
833
uvideo0 at uhub0 port 6 configuration 1 interface 0 "Chicony Electronics Co.,
Ltd. Integrated Camera" rev 2.00/23.38 addr 3
video0 at uvideo0
ugen0 at uhub3 port 1 "UPEK Biometric Coprocessor" rev 1.01/0.02 addr 2
ugen1 at uhub3 port 2 "Lenovo Computer Corp ThinkPad Bluetooth with Enhanced
Data Rate II" rev 2.00/3.99 addr 3
vscsi0 at root
scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on sd0a (3d7d414f73ffa075.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
--
Sebastian Neuper
re running it, you will know.
Yeah, ok. Thanks. :)
This bug has something to do with find(1) on ntfs partitions and daily(8) uses
find(1). A report was already sent to b...@openbsd.org . Here is a link to MARC:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=135578697512678&w=2
Best, Sebastian.
--
Sebastian Neuper
, and look if it exits normally.
I posted a same error a couple of days ago,
because I got a freezed X every night at 0:30am.
the command `boot dump` and man crash(8) will help as
mentioned, if the kernel panics.
And I would just umount any ntfs partition overnight.
Best, Sebastian.
--
Sebastian Neuper
erver with openbsd' dated 2 years
ago.
So what hardware would you buy for an openbsd file server, to get it
fast enough to provide hd video media assets via network? Which set is a robust
and
good solution and tested and proven by yourself?
Best, Sebastian.
--
Sebastian Neuper
l.
Thanks,
Sebastian.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=135646615716842&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=105889683722295&w=2
--
Sebastian Neuper
> When I look at `top`, the CPU stays below 10% most of the time. The
> network is 1Gbit/s both sides and switch. So I think I could get a
> better performance than 20MB/s while coping files to and around
> 4MB/s when coping from that server.
>
> But where is the bottleneck?
>
> I uploaded the o
On Fri, 10 May 2013 19:22:08 +1000
Brett Mahar wrote:
> On 05/10/13 14:04, Sebastian Neuper wrote:>> When I look at `top`, the
> CPU stays below 10% most of the time. The
> >> network is 1Gbit/s both sides and switch. So I think I could get a
> >> better perfor
Hi. With OpenBSD 4.0, I encounter a wrong line wrapping
in the text-terminals. If a line has 80 or more chars
there will be extra blank lines. This problem occurs
in ksh, more and less, but not in vi and lynx.
When I open a file in more, where line 28 has 85 or more
chars and I scroll down with t
11 matches
Mail list logo
