On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:13:05 +0100, sonjaya wrote:
Hi...
My boss ask how to move current obsd server to virtualiaztion ( such
as openvz, vmare , etc ) .
anyone in here sucsess moving obsd to Environment virtualization (
openvz , vmware etc ) , may be want share to me ?
So obsd become guest
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:26:19 +0100, Laurens Vets wrote:
My boss ask how to move current obsd server to virtualiaztion ( such
as openvz, vmare , etc ) .
anyone in here sucsess moving obsd to Environment virtualization (
openvz , vmware etc ) , may be want share to me ?
So obsd become guest OS
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:45:44 +0100, Laurens Vets wrote:
Laurens Vets wrote:
Alexandre Verriere wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurens Vets a icrit :
My boss ask how to move current obsd server to virtualiaztion ( such
as openvz, vmare , etc ) .
anyone in here sucsess
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:25:29 +0100, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
xterm -e "telnet `echo ${1##telnet://}|sed -e 's/:/ /'`"
...
My .telnet4firefox.sh file now is:
#!/bin/sh
xterm -e "telnet `echo ${*##telnet://} | sed 's/:/ /g'`"
...
- I understand the backtick quoted execution.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:24:37 +0100, Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your sh-kludge cited above is even worse; please DO try surfing to
telnet://localhost:1234&xmessage:bad:guys:got:in
And with my kludge it'd work with an url such as:
telnet://host:port&touch /tmp/test
or, if you us
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:25:57 +0100, William Boshuck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:02:32AM +0100, Linus Swdlas wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:25:29 +0100, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
feel free to correct me. =)
This kind of parameter substitution is in the POSIX
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:35:38 +0100, Gilbert Fernandes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Signing the hashes could help but you do know very few
people are really going to check those.
Or you pull the MD5s from another source than your packages,
not bloody likely that the two different sites you've se
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:41:36 +0100, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
the unspecified address is 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 and :: for IPv6. '*'
is ambigous and it makes no sense to assume '0.0.0.0' and '::' if
a user specifies '*'. This could lead to security problems if
someone would not be awa
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:23:55 +0100, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
so either people live with the fact that *:port becomes 0.0.0.0:port
for the IPv4 case and ::port for the IPv6 case
How about ditching support for * and just support 0.0.0.0:port and
::port?
Anyone who agrees on thi
9 matches
Mail list logo
