2009/3/11 patric conant :
> I've repeatedly been in a position where we weren't making direct use
> of OpenBSD, but were using OpenSSH, and if there were a recurring cost
> associated with it (like purchasing a semi-annual CD) it would have
> been relatively painless to get a rubber stamp approval
2009/4/30 socknoggle :
> Sorry,all. B I didn't state what I needed very well. B What I'm really
looking
> for is hardware data related to memory, swap, cpu, pci and scsi devices.
> This would be similar to the data on Linux in /proc/meminfo, /proc/cpuinfo,
> lspci -v and /proc/scsi/scsi respective
2009/5/4 Ricardo Augusto de Souza :
>
#___
> # Protecao do KERNEL
>
#___
> #Enable forwarding in kernel
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
man sysc
This is doomed to failure, mostly because I am *almost* certain that
you'll never get ESXi to install on a Soekris. My understanding is
that it has a strict HCL, very similar if not identical to the HCL for
ESX, that practically necessitates IBM, Sun, HP or Dell hardware.
Skip the virtualisation c
n the other hand, the OP could always say, "oh, ESXi HCL,
I wonder..." and google 'vmware esxi hardware compatibility'.
kmw
On 20/05/2009, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> This is way OT for this list, but:
>
> Kev
David - it looks like my mobile device did a horrendous job of
displaying your email so I apologise for coming off a bit half-cocked
in the last email (and despite it being so much more OT conversation
on the list, I still wanted to do it publicly).
2009/5/20 David Talkington :
> Kevin Wil
2009/5/21 :
> I'll have to re-think this but I
> honestly thought (I guess I'm wrong) that if I my first OpenBSD VM image
> running on ESXi as my strong firewall I would be ok. B Basically its just a
> virtualization of my physical environment but all on one box with 3 VM
images.
> So my idea was
2009/5/26 Sam Fourman Jr. :
> Sam Fourman Jr.
> sfour...@gmail.com
> rlz686
Now that's funny.
kmw
--
To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that
of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others,
who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry
2009/6/11 Joachim Schipper :
> If you decide not to go with OpenBSD, you may wish to consider
> OpenSolaris instead of FreeBSD, which will allow you to use ZFS and
> DTrace, both of which may be useful in a PostgreSQL deployment. There
> are good reasons not to use (Open)Solaris (you may consider
2009/7/20 Leonardo Rodrigues :
> For information... http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Jul/0279.html
I wondered how long it would take for someone to ask about that either
in misc@ or po...@.
I'll believe there is something to release when something gets
released or the OpenSSH devs say "oh
Eric Furman wrote:
On 08 Jan 2008 20:21:08 -0500, "Daniel Hagerty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
"Eric Furman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is one of the most retarded things I've ever read.
You might get one wanker to pay for it, but if it comes
in non-binary with all the source what's to sto
Eric Furman wrote:
*BULLSHIT*.
You have so completely missed the point it is to laugh.
Apples and Oranges.
Remember OBSD isn't GPL'ed
There's no need to continue this on the list because you don't get the
analogy so I'm replying directly.
I didn't say that OBSD is GPL'ed, did I? I said that s
chefren wrote:
On 1/9/08 12:54 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
This is one of the most retarded things I've ever read.
You might get one wanker to pay for it, but if it comes
in non-binary with all the source what's to stop them
from posting it on the internet and everybody else
getting it for free?
Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not out to convince anyone that anyone has any more
rights than anyone else.
HOWEVER, the original author DOES have more rights than anyone else.
In particular, the original author says who has what rights.
You have no say in the matter.
Your
Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was pointing out that you could release the alpha/beta/testing
software under whatever license you choose that will keep it
from being re-distributed
Huh???
What kind of "release" is not "re-distributed"?
By redistribute I do not mean th
Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:11:46AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not out to convince anyone that anyone has any more rights than anyone
else. What I *was* doing was bringing that particular portion of the
conversation back to more than just baseless bashing of a pa
bofh wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 1:52 PM, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:07:50AM -0500, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
Daniel then brought up the idea of CD sales. Something you can buy and
put an exact digital replica of online.
are sure about that? and what abo
James Mackinnon wrote:
Hi All
Just a little question on something I'm working on
I have say 50 accounts on a box.
40 of which I want the users to connect from "ANY" IP address
10 of which I want the users to only be allowed to connect from a specific IP
address that is assigned to them.
Is t
2008/10/28 Owain Ainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 05:37:24AM -0700, Neko wrote:
>> git a life
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$git clone a://life
> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/oga/life/.git/
> fatal: I don't handle protocol 'a'
Didn't anyone ever tell you not to run a
2008/11/3 Jeff1981 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I actually am starting the use of OpenBSD thanks to production team.
> Please can you help me to pass this error message when I try to connect my
> NAS an external drive (a network drive). This works on my other computer but
> not from the one on BSD, I ha
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
I read there (http://www.openbsd.org/art1.html):
but do not make profit from them since our own T-shirt sales provide
funding so that OpenBSD can continue to operate.
Recently it was said on a mailing list, that T-shirt sales do *not*
provide net funding, only donat
2008/5/22 frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> bios: UTC
> os: timezone
This is how I setup all of my *strictly* *nix machines, be they
GNU/Linux or *BSD.
> bios: localtime
> os: localtime and pretend i am in a timezone? (ntpd gets crazy this way)
This is what I do for machines that dual boot
2008/7/16 Nuno MagalhC#es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Eheh he's right :-) If you guys get your heads out of your asses and
> actually read his words with the use of some common sense you might
> get what he means. It's a balanced opinion.
It's not that it isn't a balanced opinion or that he may be rig
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 01:13, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> For example, is it possible to block a well-known social networking
>> site which resolves to multiple IP addresses, using a PF table
>> with just the hostname of the website?
> No. B What you want is to expand to all of the addresses. B Sin
On 20 October 2011 04:21, carlopmart wrote:
> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_blacklists
>
> B But, what is your opinion about this table?? What are the most reliable
> suppliers??? Which of these lists is sure to be deployed in a production
> environment? I do no
On 13 July 2010 16:54, Jiri B. wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:46:13 +0200
> Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
>> Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses
>> the GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
> Why are you asking on OpenBSD mailing list? OMG.
Probably for the same
On 22 September 2010 15:29, Rikky Taylor wrote:
> I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3
> interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules.
Define a "fair amount of NAT'ing". Twenty machines in one class C,
multiple class B networks fill
On 19 February 2010 11:21, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Lars Nooden wrote:
>> L. V. Lammert wrote:
>> > ... no way I'd saddle some of these
>> > guys with vi, much less setting the cron time parameters correctly.
>> Then you are far, far better off not letting them anywhere near
On 19 February 2010 14:37, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
>> If *you* are letting underqualified users have privileged access to an
>> Unix machine then the failure here is *you*.
> Didn't say they had access to the **MACHINE** THAT'
On 19 February 2010 14:32, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Johan Beisser wrote:
>> What the hell is so hard about:
> If you have to ask what's so hard, it's too hard. The OP was about making
> the process **SIMPLE**, .. not complicated. Man pages are used to learn
> about a command,
On 19 February 2010 16:14, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
>> On 19 February 2010 14:37, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>>
>> > Didn't say they had access to the **MACHINE** THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT FOR
>> > THE NCURSES QUESTION,
2009/10/8 Joachim Schipper :
> What, specifically, fails to work?
>
> OpenBSD has a snort package, I assume that will install without issues.
> Don't you get a working IDS just by installing the port (and updating
> the rules, if so desired)? What, specifically, are the issues?
Not only what fail
2009/11/17 Steve Shockley :
> Under VMware ESX, which NIC works better with OpenBSD, E1000, pcn or vic?
In my experience, e1000 has been the way to go.
kmw
--
Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a
double-
On 19 December 2010 07:16, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Ryan McBride [2010-12-03 09:52]:
>> More than 100,000. I havn't tested lately (planning to do so soo), but I
>> would expect somewhere closer to 500,000.
> you're way off ;)
> I had 2 million during a DDoS. things got a bit slow but everythi
34 matches
Mail list logo
