I'm not so convinced it is that complex on a homogeneous OpenBSD
network. OpenBSD is a very manageable system, such as the entire OS
contained in compressed tarballs for easy extraction and the flexible
ports system. Both of these entities are easily scriptable. Then all
there is to worry about is
On 1/27/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Without details, that's about the best I can do. Some things which may
or may not be useful to you:
siteXYtools
some form of binary patching
freeNX, some VNC, or just plain X-over-the-network; or rdesktop,
if you use
On 1/27/07, Reiner Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the next 2 weeks, a free NX client will be released which is runs on
OpenBSD without Linux emulation. All closed source parts from Nomachine
client are rewritten. As there are some parts from original Nomachine
client was used, it will be rele
On 10/5/07, Gerald Thornberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been informed that I was talking out of my hat, as I suspected.
> KQEMU (QEMU accelerator) is a Linux kernel module and, therefore, not
> an option for the OpenBSD. I'll put my hat back on my head now.
For whatever it's worth, I had
I've finally taken the time to look into why sound doesn't work on my
laptop under 3.9 RELEASE. The full dmesg is below, however the part I
think is most relevant is here:
auich0 at pci0 dev 31 function 5 "Intel 82801DB AC97" rev
0x03pci_intr_map: no mapping for pin B
Both auich(4) and the suppo
On 6/24/06, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to install to a 128M CF, I suppose you're limiting
yourself to base39.tgz, etc39.tgz and a few bytes or spare space. I
wonder whether flashdist (as is rather popular on Soekris devices)
would be an easier tool for you.
Citing Goog
On 6/25/06, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You'll have a hard time fitting that on 128Mb. base, etc, man, bsd and bsd.rd
adds up to ~170Mb and I doubt leaving out man and bsd.rd will get it down to
less than 128Mb.
Speaking again from experience, it is possible to get by without
man.tg
Here's what I think is cool: despite the tendency public forums
discussing the subject have of saying "OpenBSD people generally (or
Theo, or someone else specifically) are jerks", those same "jerks"
value freedom enough to write the best-engineered general purpose
operating system available, the w
go to".
Can you offer suggestions?
I appreciate any help you can give, even if it's just "RTFM". Thanks.
-Josh Tolley
On 6/3/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd have no problem coming up with or supervising a few projects for
> students like t
> > > I do like the installer though, I'm serious.
> > I'm right in the middle of installing 3.7 via serial port B on a Sun
> > I LOVE the OpenBSD installer.
> I really have to second this. The OpenBSD installer is great.
I had to laugh when I overheard two friends who typically work with
Windo
> On Sunday 10 July 2005 06:13 pm, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > Qv6 wrote:
> > > I have set up an OBSD firewall to replace my PIX, and configured it
> > > to log to an OBSD log server - a loghost. I'll like to set up a web
> > > interface to monitor the logs using msyslog (with mysql and php).
> > > H
So I have an FTP server behind a pf firewall running generic 3.6, and
am trying to run ftp-proxy in reverse mode. Active transfers work, but
passive ones don't. I'm quite sure the firewall rules are right,
because of the active transfers working, and because I can see the
problem in the FTP logs. H
On 7/20/05, Josh Tolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I have an FTP server behind a pf firewall running generic 3.6, and
> am trying to run ftp-proxy in reverse mode. Active transfers work, but
> passive ones don't.
> So I found out about the -S option, which I un
I have to think this has been asked before, but Googling and
archive-searching didn't show me anything enlightening. I'd like to
measure bandwidth on my enc0 interface. I can easily monitor the
physical interfaces on my routers using netstat or snmp, but all the
statistics for enc0 (and pflog0, and
One of my cronjobs, as suggested in the atactl manpage, is the
following, designed to email me if my soekris gets disk errors (it's a
disk-based install, not a flash-based one).
0 * * * * /sbin/atactl /dev/wd0c smartstatus > /dev/null
Typically, and as expected, this doesn't end up sending me any
out what that
> means yet ;) Anyone know
> --
> Allie Daneman
> Allnix,LLC.
> http://www.allnix.net
>
> On Fri, August 26, 2005 10:04, Josh Tolley wrote:
> > One of my cronjobs, as suggested in the atactl manpage, is the
> > following, designed to email me if my soek
On 4/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As to losing data, I suspect you'd lose a lot more
> from PostgreSQL than MySQL on a failing hard drive.
Any particular reason for that suspicion? I ask out of genuine
interest, and I promise I don't want to start a flame war.
-Josh
On 5/3/06, Will H. Backman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking for some hints on evaluating load average. I have a new
system that is showing load averages over .50 most of the time, but I
don't see that it is doing much according to systat vmstat. I figured
that this machine would be way ov
> From: Jeremy Huiskamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: May 29, 2006 11:46:07 PM EDT (CA)
> To: "Leonardo Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Status of tomcat on OpenBSD
>
> And failing that, vanilla tomcat usually just requires an unpack
> and run, so long as you've got java installed prope
partition somewhere and linking it in the right place. Even in cases
where you do need more space on a partition, it's much easier to move
the data to a larger partition if "larger" means "> 100 GB" instead of
"> 1 TB".
-Josh Tolley
On 11/10/05, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are a number of examples and projects online. The Soekris
> lists are a fountain of good information. Personally, I like the
> flashdist project.
>
> http://www.nmedia.net/~chris/soekris/
>
> --
> Jason Dixon
> DixonGroup Consulting
>
Running oracle on any unsupported platform is probably not the best
idea, not only because you won't get support, but also because running
it on a more secure platform will still leave you with lots of holes;
in other words, you're going to need something in front of the box to
protect it anyway. O
On 12/5/05, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:57:15 -0700, Josh Tolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >OpenBSD is written for uses
> >where freedom, stability, adherence to standards, and security are the
> >top concerns
ne who worked at it could probably get more out of it.
-Josh Tolley
24 matches
Mail list logo
