Hi all
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I
watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are less powerful and expensive
for a complete solution. I also looked at the solution Soekris but is
expensive compared to D510mo from Intel.
In the doc OpenBSD i386:
http://openbsd.org
yes, exactly !!!
See my complete post before.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:02:23 -0400, Brad Tilley
wrote:
> FRLinux wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper
>> wrote:
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
>>> Okay, but what is your question?
>>
>>
>> I g
Hi
In this text, I have a athlon1 available. But it takes a lot of
room, very hot, a lot of noise, and consumes much electricity. I try to
disconnect the fan to see, but the CPU temperature was up to 105 B0 C in 5
minutes. Otherwise, OpenBSD operating nickel above, I installed all the
packets, X-
In fact, there is color, the buttons work. That's cool :)
Tanks
> Maybe, but it beats the pants off the old Asus eeePC I had. It's a
> netbook. I use it for portable productivity, coding, testing and web
> surfing... not as an Internet gateway/FW.
--
@plus
very, very small processor. N270 best performance? . Firewall or desktop ?
>
> OpenBSD 4.6-current (RAMDISK_CD) #149: Mon Sep 14 04:31:59 MDT 2009
> t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
> cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
> 1.60
Hi
I also crash X server. My graphics controller is an Intel GMA 3150 tested
with OpenBSD 4.7.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:17:27 +0200, Dusty wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've recently installed OpenBSD 4.7 Release on my laptop, an Acer Aspire
> One with SSD. Enjoying the improved performance I decided I wanted
Sorry
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:17:25 +0200, Robert wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:32:56 +0200
> "E.T" wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I also crash X server. My graphics controller is an Intel GMA 3150
>> tested with OpenBSD 4.7.
>
> Don't hijack threads.
> Search the mailinglist first.
--
@plus
Tank you Sean, I'll try to respond to your message
Indeed, a firewall is not a desktop. On the site openbsd.org is indicated
support for OpenBSD i386 processors Atom platform. But it is not clear
Atom1, Atom2, while the responses were made, are on Atom1. A firewall must
be 100% supported by the pl
:35:05 -0400, Daniel Ouellet
wrote:
> On 6/10/10 4:06 PM, E.T wrote:
>> My main
>> question and therefore, is that OpenBSD supports a 100%, the atom
D510?.
>> The X server is configured with more time. But there will be no more
bugs
>> or conflicts later, more severe and tr
> * Nick [2010-06-11 12:55]:
>> If you want low power consumption and low cost, I'd suggest a small
>> PIII or Celeron based system, hard to beat for the price (usually,
>> free!). IF the new, cool stuff has any real power savings, you are
>> unlikely to ever recoup the initial cost over recycled
Well, good interesting thoughts.
> Heh PIII and low performance when comparing with Atom? Are you sure
> that you know design and construction of Atom? ;-) Same with low
> puissance, about hot and electricity...there is PIII mobile and then
> PIII-M which was predecessor to Pentium M
mother card
> Saving 10 watts will save you (0.01kW * 24h * 365) = 87.6kWh per year.
> Realistic savings might be around 20 watts, for a 35-40 watt P3 and
> 15-20W Atom. Calculate for yourself if it is worth it.
The future is processor ARM, Openbsd suppoorted ARM is good way. This
month, canoncial and linaro(
> Are you sure that you know function of data center? Or maybe it's not
> standard in France, but here you have : access restrictions to
> datacenter with pictures, personal data, cameras are everywhere with
> long enough backup of data, encoded racks so only you or persons you
> allowed have acces
> Can't find any physical. Only those like this one
> http://tinyurl.com/hsbcbreach which is from employee of HSBC and those
> datacenters are managed by different people and companies. Which is in
> fact just confirmation that most of the problems come from inside of
> companies. Because it's much
> It looks same http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=29035
> , same cache size, same speed, no virtualization support and 510 has
> worse consumption, maybe because of integrated VGA. Why they don't
> specify eg. FSB for D510? Because it's worse? i86 is still same crap
> (and those
> Et en quoi l'iPad est le futur de l'informatique ? Pourquoi donc n'y
> a-t-il pas d'ARM multiprocesseurs ou multicoeurs ? Pourquoi donc
> n'utilise-t-on jamais de processeurs ARM lorsque l'on a des besoins
> importants en entrC)es/sorties, par exemple pour des serveurs de fichiers
> ou de base de
> A buildings a building and it depends on what measures are taken. At a
> data center who knows who should be where. At home you can remove
> secure from ttys asking for password on boot -s use solanoids which
> lock the metal case to the pc from bios setting and set the bios to
> prevent boot wit
> I'm not sure what you're saying, aside from cages are good?
>
> Data centres are often complicated and have many with keys or lockpics,
> kvms or people leaving fingerprints around etc and the machines have
> been rebooted a lot, without precautions. We've always said fingerprint
> readers were
Thank you for all the answers, I think we went around the issue.
bye
Hence the question of having a powerful processor?
One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique 800mhz, good work.
Processor mult-core 3.00ghz not utility for firewall and desktop.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:44:37 +0100, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
>> I can also show you PIII systems that draw more
Sorry, my english is very bad ...
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:47:08 +0100, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:28 +0200
> "E.T" wrote:
>
>> Hence the question of having a powerful processor?
>>
>> One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique
Hi tous
Comme, j'ai eu des dizaines de retours intC)ressants avec mon
post "Processeur Atom ", dont plusieurs disait en gros : "la plateforme
Atom est pas cher, mais nulle en performance"( 80 euros )," Le soekris est
bon , mais c'est trC)s faible en puissance et coC;te une fortune" (230
euros). P
Yes
Small webiste personal = server at home
big project = datacenter
We agree
>> why pay 100dollars/month, 1200dollars/yaer for a server ???.
>
> because you get what you pay for.
>
> maintaining a sane & secure & reliable data center isn't exactly
> cheap.
--
@plus
One hangover :)
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:24:43 -0500, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>>
>>
>> Microsoft spends $10B on R&D. That is nearly the ENTIRE budget of
NASA.
>> They are the classic example of organizations that are completely out
of
>> control and rely entirely on some pro
Quote from theo :
- " our kernels have no bugs "
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:26:18 +0200, pourl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I was wondering if these accusations against OpenBSD were true,
> I doubt he is lying, maybe he is just not telling the whole truth.
>
> http://www.uaoug.org.ua/
Hi
Very good performance putty :)
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:36:38 +0200, Ektor WetterstrC6m
wrote:
> I know http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ is wrong / outdated /
> non-scientific / whatever... But what about this? Phoronix has more
> credibility imho...
>
>
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a
26 matches
Mail list logo
